sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Bhattacharjee, D.

Normalized to: Bhattacharjee, D.

3 article(s) in total. 199 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 8,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:2006.00130  [pdf] - 2104899
Fiducial displacements with improved accuracy for the global network of gravitational wave detectors
Comments: 26 pages, 10 figures and 8 tables
Submitted: 2020-05-29
As sensitivities improve and more detectors are added to the global network of gravitational wave observatories, calibration accuracy and precision are becoming increasingly important. Photon calibrators, relying on power-modulated auxiliary laser beams reflecting from suspended interferometer optics, enable continuous calibration by generating displacement fiducials proportional to the modulated laser power. Developments in the propagation of laser power calibration via transfer standards to on-line power sensors monitoring the modulated laser power have enabled generation of length fiducials with improved accuracy. Estimated uncertainties are almost a factor of two smaller than the lowest values previously reported. This is partly due to improvements in methodology that have increased confidence in the results reported. Referencing the laser power calibration standards for each observatory to a single transfer standard enables reducing relative calibration errors between elements of the detector network. Efforts within the national metrology institute community to realize improved laser power sensor calibration accuracy are ongoing.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:2005.02531  [pdf] - 2090717
Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-05-05
The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be $< 7\%$ in magnitude and $< 4$ deg in phase ($68\%$ confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of $< 2\%$ in magnitude and $< 2$ deg in phase.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:2002.01519  [pdf] - 2043608
Quantum correlations between the light and kilogram-mass mirrors of LIGO
Yu, Haocun; McCuller, L.; Tse, M.; Barsotti, L.; Mavalvala, N.; Betzwieser, J.; Blair, C. D.; Dwyer, S. E.; Effler, A.; Evans, M.; Fernandez-Galiana, A.; Fritschel, P.; Frolov, V. V.; Kijbunchoo, N.; Matichard, F.; McClelland, D. E.; McRae, T.; Mullavey, A.; Sigg, D.; Slagmolen, B. J. J.; Whittle, C.; Buikema, A.; Chen, Y.; Corbitt, T. R.; Schnabel, R.; Abbott, R.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R. X.; Ananyeva, A.; Appert, S.; Arai, K.; Areeda, J. S.; Asali, Y.; Aston, S. M.; Austin, C.; Baer, A. M.; Ball, M.; Ballmer, S. W.; Banagiri, S.; Barker, D.; Bartlett, J.; Berger, B. K.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Billingsley, G.; Biscans, S.; Blair, R. M.; Bode, N.; Booker, P.; Bork, R.; Bramley, A.; Brooks, A. F.; Brown, D. D.; Cahillane, C.; Cannon, K. C.; Chen, X.; Ciobanu, A. A.; Clara, F.; Cooper, S. J.; Corley, K. R.; Countryman, S. T.; Covas, P. B.; Coyne, D. C.; Datrier, L. E. H.; Davis, D.; Di Fronzo, C.; Dooley, K. L.; Driggers, J. C.; Dupej, P.; Etzel, T.; Evans, T. M.; Feicht, J.; Fulda, P.; Fyffe, M.; Giaime, J. A.; Giardina, K. D.; Godwin, P.; Goetz, E.; Gras, S.; Gray, C.; Gray, R.; Green, A. C.; Gupta, Anchal; Gustafson, E. K.; Gustafson, R.; Hanks, J.; Hanson, J.; Hardwick, T.; Hasskew, R. K.; Heintze, M. C.; Helmling-Cornell, A. F.; Holland, N. A.; Jones, J. D.; Kandhasamy, S.; Karki, S.; Kasprzack, M.; Kawabe, K.; King, P. J.; Kissel, J. S.; Kumar, Rahul; Landry, M.; Lane, B. B.; Lantz, B.; Laxen, M.; Lecoeuche, Y. K.; Leviton, J.; Liu, J.; Lormand, M.; Lundgren, A. P.; Macas, R.; MacInnis, M.; Macleod, D. M.; Mansell, G. L.; Márka, S.; Márka, Z.; Martynov, D. V.; Mason, K.; Massinger, T. J.; McCarthy, R.; McCormick, S.; McIver, J.; Mendell, G.; Merfeld, K.; Merilh, E. L.; Meylahn, F.; Mistry, T.; Mittleman, R.; Moreno, G.; Mow-Lowry, C. M.; Mozzon, S.; Nelson, T. J. N.; Nguyen, P.; Nuttall, L. K.; Oberling, J.; Oram, Richard J.; Osthelder, C.; Ottaway, D. J.; Overmier, H.; Palamos, J. R.; Parker, W.; Payne, E.; Pele, A.; Perez, C. J.; Pirello, M.; Radkins, H.; Ramirez, K. E.; Richardson, J. W.; Riles, K.; Robertson, N. A.; Rollins, J. G.; Romel, C. L.; Romie, J. H.; Ross, M. P.; Ryan, K.; Sadecki, T.; Sanchez, E. J.; Sanchez, L. E.; Saravanan, T. R.; Savage, R. L.; Schaetzl, D.; Schofield, R. M. S.; Schwartz, E.; Sellers, D.; Shaffer, T.; Smith, J. R.; Soni, S.; Sorazu, B.; Spencer, A. P.; Strain, K. A.; Sun, L.; Szczepańczyk, M. J.; Thomas, M.; Thomas, P.; Thorne, K. A.; Toland, K.; Torrie, C. I.; Traylor, G.; Urban, A. L.; Vajente, G.; Valdes, G.; Vander-Hyde, D. C.; Veitch, P. J.; Venkateswara, K.; Venugopalan, G.; Viets, A. D.; Vo, T.; Vorvick, C.; Wade, M.; Ward, R. L.; Warner, J.; Weaver, B.; Weiss, R.; Willke, B.; Wipf, C. C.; Xiao, L.; Yamamoto, H.; Yu, Hang; Zhang, L.; Zucker, M. E.; Zweizig, J.
Comments:
Submitted: 2020-02-04
Measurement of minuscule forces and displacements with ever greater precision encounters a limit imposed by a pillar of quantum mechanics: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. A limit to the precision with which the position of an object can be measured continuously is known as the standard quantum limit (SQL). When light is used as the probe, the SQL arises from the balance between the uncertainties of photon radiation pressure imposed on the object and of the photon number in the photoelectric detection. The only possibility surpassing the SQL is via correlations within the position/momentum uncertainty of the object and the photon number/phase uncertainty of the light it reflects. Here, we experimentally prove the theoretical prediction that this type of quantum correlation is naturally produced in the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). Our measurements show that the quantum mechanical uncertainties in the phases of the 200 kW laser beams and in the positions of the 40 kg mirrors of the Advanced LIGO detectors yield a joint quantum uncertainty a factor of 1.4 (3dB) below the SQL. We anticipate that quantum correlations will not only improve gravitational wave (GW) observatories but all types of measurements in future.