Normalized to: Bhattacharjee, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.00130 [pdf] - 2104899
Fiducial displacements with improved accuracy for the global network of
gravitational wave detectors
Submitted: 2020-05-29
As sensitivities improve and more detectors are added to the global network
of gravitational wave observatories, calibration accuracy and precision are
becoming increasingly important. Photon calibrators, relying on power-modulated
auxiliary laser beams reflecting from suspended interferometer optics, enable
continuous calibration by generating displacement fiducials proportional to the
modulated laser power. Developments in the propagation of laser power
calibration via transfer standards to on-line power sensors monitoring the
modulated laser power have enabled generation of length fiducials with improved
accuracy. Estimated uncertainties are almost a factor of two smaller than the
lowest values previously reported. This is partly due to improvements in
methodology that have increased confidence in the results reported. Referencing
the laser power calibration standards for each observatory to a single transfer
standard enables reducing relative calibration errors between elements of the
detector network. Efforts within the national metrology institute community to
realize improved laser power sensor calibration accuracy are ongoing.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.02531 [pdf] - 2090717
Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration
Sun, Ling;
Goetz, Evan;
Kissel, Jeffrey S.;
Betzwieser, Joseph;
Karki, Sudarshan;
Viets, Aaron;
Wade, Madeline;
Bhattacharjee, Dripta;
Bossilkov, Vladimir;
Covas, Pep B.;
Datrier, Laurence E. H.;
Gray, Rachel;
Kandhasamy, Shivaraj;
Lecoeuche, Yannick K.;
Mendell, Gregory;
Mistry, Timesh;
Payne, Ethan;
Savage, Richard L.;
Weinstein, Alan J.;
Aston, Stuart;
Buikema, Aaron;
Cahillane, Craig;
Driggers, Jenne C.;
Dwyer, Sheila E.;
Kumar, Rahul;
Urban, Alexander
Submitted: 2020-05-05
The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer
Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the
estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two
detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the
year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating
for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves
the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves.
We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of
each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic
error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six
months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified
systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical
uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on
systematic error and associated uncertainty to be $< 7\%$ in magnitude and $<
4$ deg in phase ($68\%$ confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency
band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of $< 2\%$
in magnitude and $< 2$ deg in phase.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.01519 [pdf] - 2043608
Quantum correlations between the light and kilogram-mass mirrors of LIGO
Yu, Haocun;
McCuller, L.;
Tse, M.;
Barsotti, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Effler, A.;
Evans, M.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Matichard, F.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McRae, T.;
Mullavey, A.;
Sigg, D.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Whittle, C.;
Buikema, A.;
Chen, Y.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Schnabel, R.;
Abbott, R.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Asali, Y.;
Aston, S. M.;
Austin, C.;
Baer, A. M.;
Ball, M.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barker, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bhattacharjee, D.;
Billingsley, G.;
Biscans, S.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bode, N.;
Booker, P.;
Bork, R.;
Bramley, A.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Cahillane, C.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Chen, X.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Clara, F.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corley, K. R.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Covas, P. B.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Datrier, L. E. H.;
Davis, D.;
Di Fronzo, C.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dupej, P.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, T. M.;
Feicht, J.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Godwin, P.;
Goetz, E.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, R.;
Green, A. C.;
Gupta, Anchal;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Hasskew, R. K.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Helmling-Cornell, A. F.;
Holland, N. A.;
Jones, J. D.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Karki, S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Kawabe, K.;
King, P. J.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kumar, Rahul;
Landry, M.;
Lane, B. B.;
Lantz, B.;
Laxen, M.;
Lecoeuche, Y. K.;
Leviton, J.;
Liu, J.;
Lormand, M.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macas, R.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massinger, T. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McCormick, S.;
McIver, J.;
Mendell, G.;
Merfeld, K.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Meylahn, F.;
Mistry, T.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moreno, G.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mozzon, S.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Oram, Richard J.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Parker, W.;
Payne, E.;
Pele, A.;
Perez, C. J.;
Pirello, M.;
Radkins, H.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Richardson, J. W.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Ross, M. P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Saravanan, T. R.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schaetzl, D.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schwartz, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Shaffer, T.;
Smith, J. R.;
Soni, S.;
Sorazu, B.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Strain, K. A.;
Sun, L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Toland, K.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Traylor, G.;
Urban, A. L.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vo, T.;
Vorvick, C.;
Wade, M.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Weiss, R.;
Willke, B.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Xiao, L.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yu, Hang;
Zhang, L.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2020-02-04
Measurement of minuscule forces and displacements with ever greater precision
encounters a limit imposed by a pillar of quantum mechanics: the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle. A limit to the precision with which the position of an
object can be measured continuously is known as the standard quantum limit
(SQL). When light is used as the probe, the SQL arises from the balance between
the uncertainties of photon radiation pressure imposed on the object and of the
photon number in the photoelectric detection. The only possibility surpassing
the SQL is via correlations within the position/momentum uncertainty of the
object and the photon number/phase uncertainty of the light it reflects. Here,
we experimentally prove the theoretical prediction that this type of quantum
correlation is naturally produced in the Laser Interferometer
Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). Our measurements show that the quantum
mechanical uncertainties in the phases of the 200 kW laser beams and in the
positions of the 40 kg mirrors of the Advanced LIGO detectors yield a joint
quantum uncertainty a factor of 1.4 (3dB) below the SQL. We anticipate that
quantum correlations will not only improve gravitational wave (GW)
observatories but all types of measurements in future.