The supersoft X-ray and optical transient ASASSN-16oh has been interpreted by Maccarone et al. (2019) as having being induced by an accretion event on a massive white dwarf, resembling a dwarf nova super-outburst. These authors argued that the supersoft X-ray spectrum had a different origin than in an atmosphere heated by shell nuclear burning, because no mass was ejected. We find instead that the event's timescale and other characteristics are typical of non-mass ejecting thermonuclear runaways, as already predicted by Shara et al. (1977) and the extensive grid of nova models by Yaron et al. (2005). We suggest that the low X-ray and bolometric luminosity in comparison to the predictions of the models of nuclear burning are due to an optically thick accretion disk, hiding most of the white dwarf surface. If this is the case, we calculated that the optical transient can be explained as a non-ejective thermonuclear event on a WD of $\simeq$1.1M$_\odot$ accreting at the rate of $\simeq3.5{-}5{\times}10^{-7}$M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$. We make predictions that should prove whether the nature of the transient event was due to thermonuclear burning or to accretion; observational proof should be obtained in the next few years, because a new outburst should occur within $\simeq$10-15 years of the event.

We analysed the light curves of four active galactic nuclei (AGN) from the Kepler field, and find multicomponent power density spectra with characteristic frequencies that are surprisingly similar to other Kepler AGNs (including ZW229-15). An identical time series analysis of randomly selected planet candidate stars revealed the same features, suggesting an instrumental origin for the variability. This result is enigmatic, as these signals have been confirmed for ZW229-15 using independent observations from Swift. Based on our re-analysis of these Swift data and test simulations, we now distinguish the instrumental artifact in Kepler data from the real pattern in Swift observations. It appears that some other AGNs observed with instruments such as XMM-Newton show similar frequency components. This supports the conclusion that the similarity between the variability timescales of the Kepler artifact and real Swift features is coincidental.