sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Betremieux, Y.

Normalized to: Betremieux, Y.

3 article(s) in total. 1 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1307.0416  [pdf] - 1551519
Transmission spectrum of Earth as a transiting exoplanet - from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared
Comments: 4 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in ApJL
Submitted: 2013-07-01, last modified: 2017-03-22
Transmission spectroscopy of exoplanets is a tool to characterize rocky planets and explore their habitability. Using the Earth itself as a proxy, we model the atmospheric cross section as a function of wavelength, and show the effect of each atmospheric species, Rayleigh scattering and refraction from 115 to 1000nm. Clouds do not significantly affect this picture because refraction prevents the lowest 12.75km of the atmosphere, in a transiting geometry for an Earth-Sun analog, to be sampled by a distant observer. We calculate the effective planetary radius for the primary eclipse spectrum of an Earth-like exoplanet around a Sun-like star. Below 200nm, ultraviolet(UV) O_2 absorption increases the effective planetary radius by about 180km, versus 27km at 760.3nm, and 14km in the near-infrared (NIR) due predominantly to refraction. This translates into a 2.6% change in effective planetary radius over the UV-NIR wavelength range, showing that the ultraviolet is an interesting wavelength range for future space missions.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1312.6625  [pdf] - 1551521
Impact of atmospheric refraction: How deeply can we probe exo-Earth's atmospheres during primary eclipse observations?
Comments: 16 pages, 11 Figures, 2 Tables, Accepted for publication in ApJ
Submitted: 2013-12-23, last modified: 2017-03-22
Most models used to predict or fit exoplanet transmission spectra do not include all the effects of atmospheric refraction. Namely, the angular size of the star with respect to the planet can limit the lowest altitude, or highest density and pressure, probed during primary eclipses, as no rays passing below this critical altitude can reach the observer. We discuss this geometrical effect of refraction for all exoplanets, and tabulate the critical altitude, density and pressure for an exoplanet identical to Earth with a 1 bar N2/O2 atmosphere, as a function of both the incident stellar flux (Venus, Earth, and Mars-like) at the top of the atmosphere, and the spectral type (O5-M9) of the host star. We show that such a habitable exo-Earth can be probed to a surface pressure of 1 bar only around the coolest stars. We present 0.4-5.0 micron model transmission spectra of Earth's atmosphere viewed as a transiting exoplanet, and show how atmospheric refraction modifies the transmission spectrum depending on the spectral type of the host star. We demonstrate that refraction is another phenomenon that can potentially explain flat transmission spectra over some spectral regions.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1507.02107  [pdf] - 1551522
Refraction in planetary atmospheres: improved analytical expressions and comparison with a new ray-tracing algorithm
Comments: 16 pages, 15 figures, 4 tables, Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2015-07-08, last modified: 2017-03-21
Atmospheric refraction affects to various degrees exoplanet transit, lunar eclipse, as well as stellar occultation observations. Exoplanet retrieval algorithms often use analytical expressions for the column abundance along a ray traversing the atmosphere as well as for the deflection of that ray, which are first order approximations valid for low densities in a spherically symmetric homogeneous isothermal atmosphere. We derive new analytical formulae for both of these quantities, which are valid for higher densities, and use them to refine and validate a new ray tracing algorithm which can be used for arbitrary atmospheric temperature-pressure profiles. We illustrate with simple isothermal atmospheric profiles the consequences of our model for different planets: temperate Earth-like and Jovian-like planets, as well as HD189733b, and GJ1214b. We find that, for both hot exoplanets, our treatment of refraction does not make much of a difference to pressures as high as 10 atmosphere, but that it is important to consider the variation of gravity with altitude for GJ1214b. However, we find that the temperate atmospheres have an apparent scale height significantly smaller than their actual density scale height at densities larger than 1 amagat, thus increasing the difficulty of detecting spectral features originating in these regions. These denser atmospheric regions form a refractive boundary layer where column abundances and ray deflection increases dramatically with decreasing impact parameter. This refractive boundary layer mimics a surface, and none of the techniques mentioned above can probe atmospheric regions denser than about 4 amagat on these temperate planets.