Normalized to: Berski, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.07503 [pdf] - 1593563
Shape and spin determination of Barbarian asteroids
Devogèle, M.;
Tanga, P.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Rivet, J. P.;
Surdej, J.;
Hanus, J.;
Abe, L.;
Antonini, P.;
Artola, R. A.;
Audejean, M.;
Behrend, R.;
Berski, F.;
Bosch, J. G.;
Bronikowska, M.;
Carbognani, A.;
Char, F.;
Kim, M. -J.;
Choi, Y. -J.;
Colazo, C. A.;
Coloma, J.;
Coward, D.;
Durkee, R.;
Erece, O.;
Forne, E.;
Hickson, P.;
Hirsch, R.;
Horbowicz, J.;
Kamiński, K.;
Kankiewicz, P.;
Kaplan, M.;
Kwiatkowski, T.;
Konstanciak, I.;
Kruszewki, A.;
Kudak, V.;
Manzini, F.;
Moon, H. -K.;
Marciniak, A.;
Murawiecka, M.;
Nadolny, J.;
Ogłoza, W.;
Ortiz, J. L;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Pallares, H.;
Peixinho, N.;
Poncy, R.;
Reyes, F.;
Reyes, J. A. de los;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sobkowiak, K.;
Pastor, S.;
Pilcher, F.;
Quiñones, M. C.;
Trela, P.;
Vernet, D.
Submitted: 2017-07-24
Context. The so-called Barbarian asteroids share peculiar, but common
polarimetric properties, probably related to both their shape and composition.
They are named after (234) Barbara, the first on which such properties were
identified. As has been suggested, large scale topographic features could play
a role in the polarimetric response, if the shapes of Barbarians are
particularly irregular and present a variety of scattering/incidence angles.
This idea is supported by the shape of (234) Barbara, that appears to be deeply
excavated by wide concave areas revealed by photometry and stellar
occultations. Aims. With these motivations, we started an observation campaign
to characterise the shape and rotation properties of Small Main- Belt Asteroid
Spectroscopic Survey (SMASS) type L and Ld asteroids. As many of them show long
rotation periods, we activated a worldwide network of observers to obtain a
dense temporal coverage. Methods. We used light-curve inversion technique in
order to determine the sidereal rotation periods of 15 asteroids and the con-
vergence to a stable shape and pole coordinates for 8 of them. By using
available data from occultations, we are able to scale some shapes to an
absolute size. We also study the rotation periods of our sample looking for
confirmation of the suspected abundance of asteroids with long rotation
periods. Results. Our results show that the shape models of our sample do not
seem to have peculiar properties with respect to asteroids with similar size,
while an excess of slow rotators is most probably confirmed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05518 [pdf] - 1224498
On the accuracy of close stellar approaches determination
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the accuracy of our knowledge of
close stellar passage distances in the pre-GAIA era.We used the most precise
astrometric and kinematic data available at the moment and prepared a list of
40 stars nominally passing (in the past or future) closer than 2 pc from the
Sun.We used a full gravitational potential of the Galaxy to calculate the
motion of the Sun and a star from their current positions to the proximity
epoch. For this calculations we used a numerical integration in rectangular,
Galactocentric coordinates. We showed that in many cases the numerical
integration of the star motion gives significantly different results than
popular rectilinear approximation.We found several new stellar candidates for
close visitors in past or in future. We used a covariance matrices of the
astrometric data for each star to estimate the accuracy of the obtained
proximity distance and epoch. To this aim we used a Monte Carlo method,
replaced each star with 10 000 of its clones and studied the distribution of
their individual close passages near the Sun. We showed that for contemporary
close neighbours the precision is quite good but for more distant stars it
strongly depends on the quality of astrometric and kinematic data. Several
examples are discussed in detail, among them the case of HIP 14473. For this
star we obtained the nominal proximity distance as small as 0.22 pc 3.78 Myr
ago. However there exist strong need for more precise astrometry of this star
since the proximity point uncertainty is unacceptably large.