Normalized to: Bernloehr, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.12149 [pdf] - 2041274
First detection of the Crab Nebula at TeV energies with a Cherenkov
telescope in a dual-mirror Schwarzschild-Couder configuration: the ASTRI-Horn
telescope
Lombardi, S.;
Catalano, O.;
Scuderi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Pareschi, G.;
Antolini, E.;
Arrabito, L.;
Bellassai, G.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biondo, B.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bottcher, G. M.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruno, P.;
Canestrari, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Caraveo, P.;
Conconi, P.;
Conforti, V.;
Contino, G.;
Cusumano, G.;
Pino, M. de Gouveia Dal;
Distefano, A.;
Farisato, G.;
Fermino, C.;
Fiorini, M.;
Frigo, A.;
Gallozzi, S.;
Gargano, C.;
Garozzo, S.;
Gianotti, F.;
Giarrusso, S.;
Gimenes, R.;
Giro, E.;
Grillo, A.;
Impiombato, D.;
Incorvaia, S.;
La Palombara, N.;
La Parola, V.;
La Rosa, G.;
Leto, G.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Marano, D.;
Martinetti, E.;
Micciche, A.;
Millul, R.;
Mineo, T.;
Nicotra, G.;
Occhipinti, G.;
Pagano, I.;
Perri, M.;
Romeo, G.;
Russo, F.;
Russo, F.;
Sacco, B.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Saturni, F. G.;
Segreto, A.;
Sironi, G.;
Sottile, G.;
Stamerra, A.;
Stringhetti, L.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tavani, M.;
Testa, V.;
Timpanaro, M. C.;
Toso, G.;
Tosti, G.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Umana, G.;
Vercellone, S.;
Sanchez, R. Zanmar;
Arcaro, C.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Cardillo, M.;
Cascone, E.;
Costa, A.;
D'Ai, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Del Santo, M.;
Fioretti, V.;
Lamastra, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Pintore, F.;
Rodeghiero, G.;
Romano, P.;
Schwarz, J.;
Sciacca, E.;
Vitello, F. R.;
Wolter, A.
Submitted: 2019-09-26, last modified: 2020-02-03
We report on the first detection of very high-energy (VHE) gamma-ray emission
from the Crab Nebula by a Cherenkov telescope in dual-mirror
Schwarzschild-Couder (SC) configuration. The result has been achieved by means
of the 4 m size ASTRI-Horn telescope, operated on Mt. Etna (Italy) and
developed in the context of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory
preparatory phase. The dual-mirror SC design is aplanatic and characterized by
a small plate scale, allowing us to implement large field of view cameras with
small-size pixel sensors and a high compactness. The curved focal plane of the
ASTRI camera is covered by silicon photo-multipliers (SiPMs), managed by an
unconventional front-end electronics based on a customized peak-sensing
detector mode. The system includes internal and external calibration systems,
hardware and software for control and acquisition, and the complete data
archiving and processing chain. The observations of the Crab Nebula were
carried out in December 2018, during the telescope verification phase, for a
total observation time (after data selection) of 24.4 h, equally divided into
on- and off-axis source exposure. The camera system was still under
commissioning and its functionality was not yet completely exploited.
Furthermore, due to recent eruptions of the Etna Volcano, the mirror reflection
efficiency was reduced. Nevertheless, the observations led to the detection of
the source with a statistical significance of 5.4 sigma above an energy
threshold of ~3 TeV. This result provides an important step towards the use of
dual-mirror systems in Cherenkov gamma-ray astronomy. A pathfinder mini-array
based on nine large field-of-view ASTRI-like telescopes is under
implementation.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.08961 [pdf] - 2001505
A very-high-energy component deep in the Gamma-ray Burst afterglow
Arakawa, H. Abdalla R. Adam F. Aharonian F. Ait Benkhali E. O. Anguener M.;
Arcaro, C.;
Armand, C.;
Ashkar, H.;
Backes, M.;
Martins, V. Barbosa;
Becherini, M. Barnard Y.;
Berge, D.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blackwell, R.;
Boettcher, M.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bregeon, J.;
Breuhaus, M.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bryan, M.;
Buechele, M.;
Bulik, T.;
Bylund, T.;
Capasso, M.;
Caroff, S.;
Carosi, A.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chand, T.;
Chandra, S.;
Chen, A.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Curylo, M.;
Davids, I. D.;
Deil, C.;
Devin, J.;
deWilt, P.;
Dirson, L.;
Djannati-Atai, A.;
Dmytriiev, A.;
Donath, A.;
Doroshenko, V.;
Dyks, J.;
Egberts, K.;
Emery, G.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Eschbach, S.;
Feijen, K.;
Fegan, S.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Funk, S.;
Fuessling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Gate, F.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giunti, L.;
Glawion, D.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Gottschall, D.;
Grondin, M. -H.;
Hahn, J.;
Haupt, M.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hoischen, C.;
Holch, T. L.;
Holler, M.;
Horns, D.;
Huber, D.;
Iwasaki, H.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jankowsky, F.;
Jardin-Blicq, A.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzynski, K.;
Katsuragawa, M.;
Katz, U.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khelifi, B.;
King, J.;
Klepser, S.;
Kluzniak, W.;
Komin, N.;
Kosack, K.;
Kostunin, D.;
Kreter, M.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lemiere, A.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leser, E.;
Levy, C.;
Lohse, T.;
Lypova, I.;
Mackey, J.;
Majumdar, J.;
Malyshev, D.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Mares, A.;
Mariaud, C.;
Marti-Devesa, G.;
Marx, R.;
Maurin, G.;
Meintjes, P. J.;
Mitchell, A. M. W.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohamed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Moore, C.;
Moulin, E.;
Muller, J.;
Murach, T.;
Nakashima, S.;
de Naurois, M.;
Ndiyavala, H.;
Niederwanger, F.;
Niemiec, J.;
Oakes, L.;
Brien, P. O;
Odaka, H.;
Ohm, S.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Panter, M.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Perennes, C.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Piel, Q.;
Pita, S.;
Poireau, V.;
Noel, A. Priyana;
Prokhorov, D. A.;
Prokoph, H.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raab, S.;
Rauth, R.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Remy, Q.;
Renaud, M.;
Rieger, F.;
Rinchiuso, L.;
Romoli, C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Ruiz-Velasco, E.;
Sahakian, V.;
Sailer, S.;
Saito, S.;
Sanchez, D. A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sasaki, M.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schuessler, F.;
Schulz, A.;
Schutte, H. M.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Seglar-Arroyo, M.;
Senniappan, M.;
Seyffert, A. S.;
Shafi, N.;
Shiningayamwe, K.;
Simoni, R.;
Sinha, A.;
Sol, H.;
Specovius, A.;
Spir-Jacob, M.;
Stawarz, L.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Steppa, C.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tavernier, T.;
Taylor, A. M.;
Terrier, R.;
Tiziani, D.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Trichard, C.;
Tsirou, M.;
Tsuji, N.;
Tuffs, R.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
van der Walt, D. J.;
van Eldik, C.;
van Rensburg, C.;
van Soelen, B.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Veh, J.;
Venter, C.;
Vincent, P.;
Vink, J.;
Voelk, H. J.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wadiasingh, Z.;
Wagner, S. J.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Yang, R.;
Yoneda, H.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zanin, R.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.;
Zywucka, N.;
de Palma, F.;
Axelsson, M.;
Roberts, O. J.
Submitted: 2019-11-20
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are brief flashes of gamma rays, considered to be the
most energetic explosive phenomena in the Universe. The emission from GRBs
comprises a short (typically tens of seconds) and bright prompt emission,
followed by a much longer afterglow phase. During the afterglow phase, the
shocked outflow -- produced by the interaction between the ejected matter and
the circumburst medium -- slows down, and a gradual decrease in brightness is
observed. GRBs typically emit most of their energy via gamma-rays with energies
in the kiloelectronvolt-to-megaelectronvolt range, but a few photons with
energies of tens of gigaelectronvolts have been detected by space-based
instruments. However, the origins of such high-energy (above one
gigaelectronvolt) photons and the presence of very-high-energy (more than 100
gigaelectronvolts) emission have remained elussive. Here we report observations
of very-high-energy emission in the bright GRB 180720B deep in the GRB
afterglow -ten hours after the end of the prompt emission phase, when the X-ray
flux had already decayed by four orders of magnitude. Two possible explanations
exist for the observed radiation: inverse Compton emission and synchrotron
emission of ultrarelativistic electrons. Our observations show that the energy
fluxes in the X-ray and gamma-ray range and their photon indices remain
comparable to each other throughout the afterglow. This discovery places
distinct constraints on the GRB environment for both emission mechanisms, with
the inverse Compton explanation alleviating the particle energy requirements
for the emission observed at late times. The late timing of this detection has
consequences for the future observations of GRBs at the highest energies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.05139 [pdf] - 1878829
H.E.S.S. observations of the flaring gravitationally lensed galaxy PKS
1830-211
Collaboration, H. E. S. S.;
:;
Abdalla, H.;
Aharonian, F.;
Benkhali, F. Ait;
Anguener, E. O.;
Arakawa, M.;
Arcaro, C.;
Armand, C.;
Arrieta, M.;
Backes, M.;
Barnard, M.;
Becherini, Y.;
Tjus, J. Becker;
Berge, D.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Blackwell, R.;
Boettcher, M.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonnefoy, S.;
Bordas, P.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bryan, M.;
Buchele, M.;
Bulik, T.;
Bylund, T.;
Capasso, M.;
Caroff, S.;
Carosi, A.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chakraborty, N.;
Chand, T.;
Chandra, S.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Chen, A.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Condon, B.;
Davids, I. D.;
Deil, C.;
Devin, J.;
deWilt, P.;
Dirson, L.;
Djannati-Atai, A.;
Dmytriiev, A.;
Donath, A.;
Doroshenko, V.;
Drury, L. O'C.;
Dyks, J.;
Egberts, K.;
Emery, G.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Eschbach, S.;
Fegan, S.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Funk, S.;
Fuessling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Gaté, F.;
Giavitto, G.;
Glawion, D.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Gottschall, D.;
Grondin, M. -H.;
Hahn, J.;
Haupt, M.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hoischen, C.;
Holch, T. L.;
Holler, M.;
Horns, D.;
Huber, D.;
Iwasaki, H.;
Jacholkowska, A.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jankowsky, F.;
Jouvin, L.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzynski, K.;
Katsuragawa, M.;
Katz, U.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
King, J.;
Klepser, S.;
Kluzniak, W.;
Komin, Nu.;
Kosack, K.;
Kraus, M.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lau, J.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
Lemière, A.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Leser, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lopez-Coto, R.;
Lorentz, M.;
Lypova, I.;
Malyshev, D.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Mariaud, C.;
Marti-Devesa, G.;
Marx, R.;
Maurin, G.;
Meintjes, P. J.;
Mitchell, A. M. W.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohamed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Moore, C.;
Moulin, E.;
Murach, T.;
Nakashima, S.;
de Naurois, M.;
Ndiyavala, H.;
Niederwanger, F.;
Niemiec, J.;
Oakes, L.;
O'Brien, P.;
Odaka, H.;
Ohm, S.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Panter, M.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Perennes, C.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Piel, Q.;
Pita, S.;
Poireau, V.;
Noel, A. Priyana;
Prokhorov, D. A.;
Prokoph, H.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raab, S.;
Rauth, R.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Rieger, F.;
Rinchiuso, L.;
Romoli, C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Ruiz-Velasco, E.;
Sahakian, V.;
Saito, S.;
Sanchez, D. A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Sasaki, M.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schuessler, F.;
Schulz, A.;
Schutte, H;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Seglar-Arroyo, M.;
Senniappan, M.;
Seyffert, A. S.;
Shafi, N.;
Shilon, I.;
Shiningayamwe, K.;
Simoni, R.;
Sinha, A.;
Sol, H.;
Specovius, A.;
Spir-Jacob, M.;
Stawarz, L.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Steppa, C.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Tavernier, T.;
Taylor, A. M.;
Terrier, R.;
Tiziani, D.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Trichard, C.;
Tsirou, M.;
Tsuji, N.;
Tuffs, R.;
Uchiyama, Y.;
van der Walt, D. J.;
van Eldik, C.;
van Rensburg, C.;
van Soelen, B.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Veh, J.;
Venter, C.;
Vincent, P.;
Vink, J.;
Voisin, F.;
Voelk, H. J.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wadiasingh, Z.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R. M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Yang, R.;
Yoneda, H.;
Zaborov, D.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zanin, R.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.;
Zywucka, N.
Submitted: 2019-04-10
PKS 1830-211 is a known macrolensed quasar located at a redshift of z=2.5.
Its high-energy gamma-ray emission has been detected with the Fermi-LAT
instrument and evidence for lensing was obtained by several authors from its
high-energy data.
Observations of PKS 1830-211 were taken with the H.E.S.S. array of Imaging
Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes in August 2014, following a flare alert by the
Fermi- LAT collaboration. The H.E.S.S observations were aimed at detecting a
gamma-ray flare delayed by 20-27 days from the alert flare, as expected from
observations at other wavelengths.
More than twelve hours of good quality data were taken with an analysis
threshold of $\sim67$ GeV. The significance of a potential signal is computed
as a function of the date as well as the average significance over the whole
period. Data are compared to simultaneous observations by Fermi-LAT.
No photon excess or significant signal is detected. An upper limit on PKS
1830-211 flux above 67 GeV is computed and compared to the extrapolation of the
Fermi-LAT flare spectrum.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.06526 [pdf] - 1317069
Cross Calibration of Telescope Optical Throughput Efficiencies using
Reconstructed Shower Energies for the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Submitted: 2015-10-22
For reliable event reconstruction of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes
(IACTs), calibration of the optical throughput efficiency is required. Within
current facilities, this is achieved through the use of ring shaped images
generated by muons. Here, a complementary approach is explored, achieving cross
calibration of elements of IACT arrays through pairwise comparisons between
telescopes, focussing on its applicability to the upcoming Cherenkov Telescope
Array (CTA). Intercalibration of telescopes of a particular type using
eventwise comparisons of shower image amplitudes has previously been
demonstrated to recover the relative telescope optical responses. A method
utilising the reconstructed energy as an alternative to image amplitude is
presented, enabling cross calibration between telescopes of varying types
within an IACT array. Monte Carlo studies for two plausible CTA layouts have
shown that this calibration procedure recovers the relative telescope response
efficiencies at the few percent level.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.3106 [pdf] - 718892
Influence of aerosols from biomass burning on the spectral analysis of
Cherenkov telescopes
Submitted: 2013-09-12
During the last decade, imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes (IACTs) have
proven themselves as astronomical detectors in the very-high-energy (VHE; E>0.1
TeV) regime. The IACT technique observes the VHE photons indirectly, using the
Earth's atmosphere as a calorimeter. Much of the calibration of Cherenkov
telescope experiments is done using Monte Carlo simulations of the air shower
development, Cherenkov radiation and detector, assuming certain models for the
atmospheric conditions. Any deviation of the real conditions during
observations from the assumed atmospheric model will result in a wrong
reconstruction of the primary gamma-ray energy and the resulting source
spectra. During eight years of observations, the High Energy Stereoscopic
System (H.E.S.S.) has experienced periodic natural as well as anthropogenic
variations of the atmospheric transparency due to aerosols created by biomass
burning.
In order to identify data that have been taken under such long-term
reductions in atmospheric transparency, a new monitoring quantity, the
Cherenkov transparency coefficient, has been developed and will be presented
here. This quantity is independent of hardware changes in the detector and,
therefore, isolates atmospheric factors that can impact the performance of the
instrument, and in particular the spectral results. Its positive correlation
with independent measurements of the atmospheric optical depth (AOD) retrieved
from data of the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) on board of the
Terra NASA's satellite is also presented here.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.1370 [pdf] - 1150563
Constraints on the gamma-ray emission from the cluster-scale AGN
outburst in the Hydra A galaxy cluster
HESS Collaboration;
Abramowski, A.;
Acero, F.;
Aharonian, F.;
Akhperjanian, A. G.;
Anton, G.;
Balenderan, S.;
Balzer, A.;
Barnacka, A.;
Becherini, Y.;
Becker, J.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Birsin, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Bochow, A.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bordas, P.;
Brucker, J.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bulik, T.;
Buesching, I.;
Carrigan, S.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chadwick, P. M.;
Charbonnier, A.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Cheesebrough, A.;
Cologna, G.;
Conrad, J.;
Couturier, C.;
Daniel, M. K.;
Davids, I. D.;
Degrange, B.;
Deil, C.;
Dickinson, H. J.;
Djannati-Atai, A.;
Domainko, W.;
Drury, L. O'C.;
Dubus, G.;
Dutson, K.;
Dyks, J.;
Dyrda, M.;
Egberts, K.;
Eger, P.;
Espigat, P.;
Fallon, L.;
Fegan, S.;
Feinstein, F.;
Fernandes, M. V.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Foerster, A.;
Fuessling, M.;
Gajdus, M.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Garrigoux, T.;
Gast, H.;
Gerard, L.;
Giebels, B.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Glueck, B.;
Goering, D.;
Grondin, M. -H.;
Haeffner, S.;
Hague, J. D.;
Hahn, J.;
Hampf, D.;
Harris, J.;
Hauser, M.;
Heinz, S.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hillert, A.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hofverberg, P.;
Holler, M.;
Horns, D.;
Jacholkowska, A.;
Jahn, C.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jung, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzynski, K.;
Katz, U.;
Kaufmann, S.;
Khelifi, B.;
Klochkov, D.;
Kluzniak, W.;
Kneiske, T.;
Komin, Nu.;
Kosack, K.;
Kossakowski, R.;
Krayzel, F.;
Laffon, H.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Lennarz, D.;
Lohse, T.;
Lopatin, A.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Masbou, J.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Mayer, M.;
McComb, T. J. L.;
Medina, M. C.;
Mehault, J.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohamed, M.;
Moulin, E.;
Naumann, C. L.;
Naumann-Godo, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Nedbal, D.;
Nekrassov, D.;
Nguyen, N.;
Nicholas, B.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nolan, S. J.;
Ohm, S.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Opitz, B.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Panter, M.;
Arribas, M. Paz;
Pekeur, N. W.;
Pelletier, G.;
Perez, J.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Pita, S.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raue, M.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Reyes, R. de los;
Rieger, F.;
Ripken, J.;
Rob, L.;
Rosier-Lees, S.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rulten, C. B.;
Sahakian, V.;
Sanchez, D. A.;
Santangelo, A.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schulz, A.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwarzburg, S.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Sheidaei, F.;
Skilton, J. L.;
Sol, H.;
Spengler, G.;
Stawarz, L.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Stinzing, F.;
Stycz, K.;
Sushch, I.;
Szostek, A.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Terrier, R.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Valerius, K.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Venter, C.;
Viana, A.;
Vincent, P.;
Voelk, H. J.;
Volpe, F.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vorster, M.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Ward, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zajczyk, A.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H. -S.;
Ali, M. O.
Submitted: 2012-08-07
In some galaxy clusters powerful AGN have blown bubbles with cluster scale
extent into the ambient medium. The main pressure support of these bubbles is
not known to date, but cosmic rays are a viable possibility. For such a
scenario copious gamma-ray emission is expected as a tracer of cosmic rays from
these systems. Hydra A, the closest galaxy cluster hosting a cluster scale AGN
outburst, located at a redshift of 0.0538, is investigated for being a
gamma-ray emitter with the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) array and
the Fermi Large Area Telescope (Fermi-LAT). Data obtained in 20.2 hours of
dedicated H.E.S.S. observations and 38 months of Fermi-LAT data, gathered by
its usual all-sky scanning mode, have been analyzed to search for a gamma-ray
signal. No signal has been found in either data set. Upper limits on the
gamma-ray flux are derived and are compared to models. These are the first
limits on gamma-ray emission ever presented for galaxy clusters hosting cluster
scale AGN outbursts. The non-detection of Hydra A in gamma-rays has important
implications on the particle populations and physical conditions inside the
bubbles in this system. For the case of bubbles mainly supported by hadronic
cosmic rays, the most favorable scenario, that involves full mixing between
cosmic rays and embedding medium, can be excluded. However, hadronic cosmic
rays still remain a viable pressure support agent to sustain the bubbles
against the thermal pressure of the ambient medium. The largest population of
highly-energetic electrons which are relevant for inverse-Compton gamma-ray
production is found in the youngest inner lobes of Hydra A. The limit on the
inverse-Compton gamma-ray flux excludes a magnetic field below half of the
equipartition value of 16 muG in the inner lobes.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.4069 [pdf] - 1077429
Very-high-energy gamma-ray emission from the direction of the Galactic
globular cluster Terzan 5
HESS Collaboration;
Abramowski, A.;
Acero, F.;
Aharonian, F.;
Akhperjanian, A. G.;
Anton, G.;
Balzer, A.;
Barnacka, A.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Becherini, Y.;
Becker, J.;
Behera, B.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Bochow, A.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bordas, P.;
Brucker, J.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Bulik, T.;
Buesching, I.;
Carrigan, S.;
Casanova, S.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chadwick, P. M.;
Charbonnier, A.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Cheesebrough, A.;
Chounet, L. -M.;
Clapson, A. C.;
Coignet, G.;
Cologna, G.;
Conrad, J.;
Dalton, M.;
Daniel, M. K.;
Davids, I. D.;
Degrange, B.;
Deil, C.;
Dickinson, H. J.;
Djannati-Atai, A.;
Domainko, W.;
Drury, L. O'C.;
Dubois, F.;
Dubus, G.;
Dutson, K.;
Dyks, J.;
Dyrda, M.;
Egberts, K.;
Eger, P.;
Espigat, P.;
Fallon, L.;
Farnier, C.;
Fegan, S.;
Feinstein, F.;
Fernandes, M. V.;
Fiasson, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Foerster, A.;
Fuessling, M.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Gast, H.;
Gerard, L.;
Gerbig, D.;
Giebels, B.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Glueck, B.;
Goret, P.;
Goering, D.;
Haeffner, S.;
Hague, J. D.;
Hampf, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Heinz, S.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hoffmann, A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hofverberg, P.;
Holler, M.;
Horns, D.;
Jacholkowska, A.;
de Jager, O. C.;
Jahn, C.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Jung, I.;
Kastendieck, M. A.;
Katarzynski, K.;
Katz, U.;
Kaufmann, S.;
Keogh, D.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khelifi, B.;
Klochkov, D.;
Kluzniak, W.;
Kneiske, T.;
Komin, Nu.;
Kosack, K.;
Kossakowski, R.;
Laffon, H.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lennarz, D.;
Lohse, T.;
Lopatin, A.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Masbou, J.;
Maurin, D.;
Maxted, N.;
McComb, T. J. L.;
Medina, M. C.;
Mehault, J.;
Nguyen, N.;
Moderski, R.;
Moulin, E.;
Naumann, C. L.;
Naumann-Godo, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Nedbal, D.;
Nekrassov, D.;
Nicholas, B.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nolan, S. J.;
Ohm, S.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Opitz, B.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Oya, I.;
Panter, M.;
Arribas, M. Paz;
Pedaletti, G.;
Pelletier, G.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Pita, S.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raue, M.;
Rayner, S. M.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Reyes, R. de los;
Rieger, F.;
Ripken, J.;
Rob, L.;
Rosier-Lees, S.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rulten, C. B.;
Ruppel, J.;
Ryde, F.;
Sahakian, V.;
Santangelo, A.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schoeck, F. M.;
Schulz, A.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwarzburg, S.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Sikora, M.;
Skilton, J. L.;
Sol, H.;
Spengler, G.;
Stawarz, L.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Stinzing, F.;
Stycz, K.;
Sushch, I.;
Szostek, A.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Terrier, R.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Valerius, K.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Venter, C.;
Vialle, J. P.;
Viana, A.;
Vincent, P.;
Voelk, H. J.;
Volpe, F.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vorster, M.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Ward, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zajczyk, A.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H. -S.
Submitted: 2011-06-20, last modified: 2011-06-24
The H.E.S.S. very-high-energy (VHE, E > 0.1 TeV) gamma-ray telescope system
has discovered a new source, HESS J1747-248. The measured integral flux is (1.2
+/- 0.3) \times 10^-12 cm-2 s-1 above 440 GeV for a power-law photon spectral
index of 2.5 +/- 0.3 stat +/- 0.2 sys. The VHE gamma-ray source is located in
the close vicinity of the Galactic globular cluster Terzan 5 and extends beyond
the H.E.S.S. point spread function (0.07 degree). The probability of a chance
coincidence with Terzan 5 and an unrelated VHE source is quite low (~ 10^-4).
With the largest population of identified millisecond pulsars (msPSRs), a very
high core stellar density and the brightest GeV range flux as measured by
Fermi-LAT, Terzan 5 stands out among Galactic globular clusters. The properties
of the VHE source are briefly discussed in the context of potential emission
mechanisms, notably in relation to msPSRs. Interpretation of the available data
accommodates several possible origins for this VHE gamma-ray source, although
none of them offers a satisfying explanation of its peculiar morphology.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2089 [pdf] - 1026271
Multi-wavelength Observations of H 2356-309
HESS Collaboration;
Abramowski, A.;
Acero, F.;
Aharonian, F.;
Akhperjanian, A. G.;
Anton, G.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Bazer-Bachi, A. R.;
Becherini, Y.;
Behera, B.;
Benbow, W.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Bochow, A.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Borrel, V.;
Brucker, J.;
Brun, F.;
Brun, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Bulik, T.;
Buesching, I.;
Boutelier, T.;
Chadwick, P. M.;
Charbonnier, A.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Cheesebrough, A.;
Conrad, J.;
Chounet, L. -M.;
Clapson, A. C.;
Coignet, G.;
Costamante, L.;
Dalton, M.;
Daniel, M. K.;
Davids, I. D.;
Degrange, B.;
Deil, C.;
Dickinson, H. J.;
Djannati-Atai, A.;
Domainko, W.;
Drury, L. O'C.;
Dubois, F.;
Dubus, G.;
Dyks, J.;
Dyrda, M.;
Egberts, K.;
Eger, P.;
Espigat, P.;
Fallon, L.;
Farnier, C.;
Fegan, S.;
Feinstein, F.;
Fernandes, M. V.;
Fiasson, A.;
Foerster, A.;
Fontaine, G.;
Fuessling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gallant, Y. A.;
Gerard, L.;
Gerbig, D.;
Giebels, B.;
Glicenstein, J. F.;
Glueck, B.;
Goret, P.;
Goering, D.;
Hampf, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Heinz, S.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Henri, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J. A.;
Hoffmann, A.;
Hofmann, W.;
Hofverberg, P.;
Holleran, M.;
Hoppe, S.;
Horns, D.;
Jacholkowska, A.;
de Jager, O. C.;
Jahn, C.;
Jung, I.;
Katarzynski, K.;
Katz, U.;
Kaufmann, S.;
Kerschhaggl, M.;
Khangulyan, D.;
Khelifi, B.;
Keogh, D.;
Klochkov, D.;
Kluzniak, W.;
Kneiske, T.;
Komin, Nu.;
Kosack, K.;
Kossakowski, R.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Lohse, T.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Marandon, V.;
Marcowith, A.;
Masbou, J.;
Maurin, D.;
McComb, T. J. L.;
Medina, M. C.;
Mehault, J.;
Moderski, R.;
Moulin, E.;
Naumann-Godo, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Nedbal, D.;
Nekrassov, D.;
Nguyen, N.;
Nicholas, B.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nolan, S. J.;
Ohm, S.;
Olive, J-F.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Ona;
Opitz, B.;
Orford, K. J.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Panter, M.;
Arribas, M. Paz;
Pedaletti, G.;
Pelletier, G.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Pita, S.;
Puehlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Raubenheimer, B. C.;
Raue, M.;
Rayner, S. M.;
Reimer, O.;
Renaud, M.;
Reyes, R. de los;
Rieger, F.;
Ripken, J.;
Rob, L.;
Rosier-Lees, S.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rulten, C. B.;
Ruppel, J.;
Ryde, F.;
Sahakian, V.;
Santangelo, A.;
Schlickeiser, R.;
Schoeck, F. M.;
Schoenwald, A.;
Schwanke, U.;
Schwarzburg, S.;
Schwemmer, S.;
Shalchi, A.;
Sushch, I.;
Sikora, M.;
Skilton, J. L.;
Sol, H.;
Stawarz, L.;
Steenkamp, R.;
Stegmann, C.;
Stinzing, F.;
Szostek, A.;
Tam, P. H.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Terrier, R.;
Tibolla, O.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Valerius, K.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Venter, C.;
Venter, L.;
Vialle, J. P.;
Viana, A.;
Vincent, P.;
Vivier, M.;
Voelk, H. J.;
Volpe, F.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Ward, M.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H. -S.
Submitted: 2010-04-12, last modified: 2010-04-26
AIMS: The properties of the broad-band emission from the high-frequency
peaked BL Lac H 2356-309 (z=0.165) are investigated. METHODS: Very High Energy
(VHE; E > 100 GeV) observations of H 2356-309 were performed with the High
Energy Stereoscopic System (HESS) from 2004 through 2007. Simultaneous
optical/UV and X-ray observations were made with the XMM-Newton satellite on
June 12/13 and June 14/15, 2005. NRT radio observations were also
contemporaneously performed in 2005. ATOM optical monitoring observations were
also made in 2007. RESULTS: A strong VHE signal, ~13 sigma total, was detected
by HESS after the four years HESS observations (116.8 hrs live time). The
integral flux above 240 GeV is I(>240 GeV) = (3.06 +- 0.26 {stat} +- 0.61
{syst}) x 10^{-12} cm^{-2} s^{-1}, corresponding to ~1.6% of the flux observed
from the Crab Nebula. A time-averaged energy spectrum is measured from 200 GeV
to 2 TeV and is characterized by a power law (photon index of Gamma = 3.06 +-
0.15 {stat} +- 0.10 {syst}). Significant small-amplitude variations in the VHE
flux from H 2356-309 are seen on time scales of months and years, but not on
shorter time scales. No evidence for any variations in the VHE spectral slope
are found within these data. The XMM-Newton X-ray measurements show a
historically low X-ray state, characterized by a hard, broken-power-law
spectrum on both nights. CONCLUSIONS: The broad-band spectral energy
distribution (SED) of the blazar can be adequately fit using a simple one-zone
synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model. In the SSC scenario, higher VHE fluxes
could be expected in the future since the observed X-ray flux is at a
historically low level.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.4198 [pdf] - 19767
Imaging Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Telescopes
Submitted: 2008-12-22
The technique of gamma-ray astronomy at very high energies (VHE: > 100 GeV)
with ground-based imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes is described, the
H.E.S.S. array in Namibia serving as example. Mainly a discussion of the
physical principles of the atmospheric Cherenkov technique is given,
emphasizing its rapid development during the last decade. The present status is
illustrated by two examples: the spectral and morphological characterization in
VHE gamma-rays of a shell-type supernova remnant together with its theoretical
interpretation, and the results of a survey of the Galactic Plane that shows a
large variety of non-thermal sources. The final part is devoted to an overview
of the ongoing and future instrumental developments.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.5722 [pdf] - 18067
CTA simulations with CORSIKA/sim_telarray
Submitted: 2008-10-31
While current atmospheric Cherenkov installations consist of only a few
telescopes each, future installations will be far more complex. Monte Carlo
simulations have become an essential tool for the design and optimisation of
such installations. The CORSIKA air-shower simulation code and the sim_telarray
code for simulation of arrays of Cherenkov telescopes have been used to
simulate several candidate configurations of the future Cherenkov Telescope
Array (CTA) in detail. Together with other detailed and simplified simulations
the resulting data provide the basis for the ongoing optimisation of CTA over a
wide energy range. In this paper, the simulation methods are outlined and
preliminary results on a number of configurations are presented. It is
demonstrated that the initial goals of the CTA project can be achieved with
available technology, at least in the medium and high energy range (about 100
GeV to 100 TeV).
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0408375 [pdf] - 66866
The Trigger System of the H.E.S.S. Telescope Array
Submitted: 2004-08-20
H.E.S.S. -- The High Energy Stereoscopic System-- is a new system of large
atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes for GeV/TeV Gamma-ray astronomy. This paper
describes the trigger system of H.E.S.S. with emphasis on the multi-telescope
array level trigger. The system trigger requires the simultaneous detection of
air-showers by several telescopes at the hardware level. This requirement
allows a suppression of background events which in turn leads to a lower system
energy threshold for the detection of Gamma-rays. The implementation of the
H.E.S.S. trigger system is presented along with data taken to characterise its
performance.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308246 [pdf] - 58525
The optical system of the H.E.S.S. imaging atmospheric Cherenkov
telescopes, Part I: layout and components of the system
Bernloehr, K.;
Carrol, O.;
Cornils, R.;
Elfahem, S.;
Espigat, P.;
Gillessen, S.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Hofmann, W.;
Horns, D.;
Jung, I.;
Kankanyan, R.;
Katona, A.;
Khelifi, B.;
Krawczynski, H.;
Panter, M.;
Punch, M.;
Rayner, S.;
Rowell, G.;
Tluczykont, M.;
van Staa, R.
Submitted: 2003-08-14
H.E.S.S. -- the High Energy Stereoscopic System -- is a new system of large
imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes, with about 100 m^2 mirror area for
each of four telescopes, and photomultiplier cameras with a large field of view
(5 degr.) and small pixels (0.16 degr.). The dish and reflector are designed to
provide good imaging properties over the full field of view, combined with
mechanical stability. The paper describes the design criteria and
specifications of the system, and the individual components -- dish, mirrors,
and Winston cones -- as well as their characteristics. The optical performance
of the telescope as a whole is the subject of a companion paper.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0308247 [pdf] - 58526
The optical system of the H.E.S.S. imaging atmospheric Cherenkov
telescopes, Part II: mirror alignment and point spread function
Cornils, R.;
Gillessen, S.;
Jung., I.;
Hofmann, W.;
Beilicke, M.;
Bernloehr, K.;
Carrol, O.;
Elfahem, S.;
Heinzelmann, G.;
Hermann, G.;
Horns, D.;
Kankanyan, R.;
Katona, A.;
Krawczynski, H.;
Panter, M.;
Rayner, S.;
Rowell, G.;
Tluczykont, M.;
van Staa, R.
Submitted: 2003-08-14
Mirror facets of the H.E.S.S. imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes are
aligned using stars imaged onto the closed lid of the PMT camera, viewed by a
CCD camera. The alignment procedure works reliably and includes the automatic
analysis of CCD images and control of the facet alignment actuators. On-axis,
80% of the reflected light is contained in a circle of less than 1 mrad
diameter. The spot widens with increasing angle to the telescope axis. In
accordance with simulations, the spot size has roughly doubled at an angle of
1.4 degr. from the axis. The expected variation of spot size with elevation due
to deformations of the support structure is visible, but is completely
non-critical over the usual working range. Overall, the optical quality of the
telescope exceeds the specifications.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107149 [pdf] - 43520
Measurement of the Cherenkov light spectrum and of the polarization with
the HEGRA-IACT-system
Submitted: 2001-07-09, last modified: 2001-07-12
The HEGRA system of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) detects
Cherenkov light produced by air showers. The concept of stereoscopic
observation with the five HEGRA telescopes allows the reconstruction of various
shower parameters, for example the shower direction, the location of the shower
core and the energy of cosmic rays. One of the telescopes was modified so that
measurements of the spectrum and the polarization of Cherenkov light with the
HEGRA system were possible. The experimental setup is described and preliminary
results presented.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107174 [pdf] - 43545
Search for point sources and diffuse emission from the Galactic plane
with the HEGRA-IACT-system
Submitted: 2001-07-10
The HEGRA-IACT-system with a FoV of ~1.5 deg radius has been used for
surveying one quater of the Galactic disc in respect to point sources,
moderately extended sources and for diffuse emission in the energy range above
1 TeV. In total 140 h of good observation time were accumulated.
No new source has been discoverd. Limits on the level of 20% or lower of the
Crab flux on about 87 potential sources like SNR, Pulsars and EGRET sources are
derived. A limit on the diffuse emission is given on the level of dPhi/dE(E=1
TeV) = 6.1 10^-15 ph cm-2 s-1 sr-1 Mev-1 resulting in a lower limit of 2.5 on
the spectral index for the extrapolation of the meassured EGRET flux for the
diffuse emission.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9908093 [pdf] - 107765
Impact of atmospheric parameters on the atmospheric Cherenkov technique
Submitted: 1999-08-09
Atmospheric density profiles as well as several light absorption and
scattering processes depend on geographic position and are generally
time-variable. Their impact on the atmospheric Cherenkov technique in general
(imaging or non-imaging) is investigated. Different density profiles lead to
differences in Cherenkov light density of up to 60%. Seasonal variations at
mid-latitude sites are of the order of 15-20%. The quest for improved energy
calibration of Cherenkov experiments also shows the need for improved
transmission calculations, taking all relevant processes into account and using
realistic profiles of absorbers. Simulations including the scattering
mechanisms also reveal the relevance of Rayleigh and Mie scattering for
atmospheric Cherenkov experiments. Refraction and the differences between
treating the atmosphere in plane-parallel or spherical geometry are also
investigated.