When comparing nebular electron densities derived from collisionally excited lines (CELs) to those estimated using the emission measure, significant discrepancies are common. The standard solution is to view nebulae as aggregates of dense regions of constant density in an otherwise empty void. This porosity is parametrized by a filling factor $f<1$. Similarly, abundance and temperature discrepancies between optical recombination lines (ORLs) and CELs are often explained by invoking a dual delta distribution of a dense, cool, metal-rich component immersed in a diffuse, warm, metal-poor plasma. In this paper, we examine the possibility that the observational diagnostics that lead to such discrepancies can be produced by a realistic distribution of density and temperature fluctuations, such as might arise in plasma turbulence. We produce simulated nebulae with density and temperature fluctuations described by various probability distribution functions (pdfs). Standard astronomical diagnostics are applied to these simulated observations to derive estimates of nebular densities, temperatures, and abundances. Our results show that for plausible density pdfs the simulated observations lead to filling factors in the observed range. None of our simulations satisfactorily reproduce the abundance discrepancy factors (ADFs) in planetary nebulae, although there is possible consistency with \ion{H}{ii} regions. Compared to the case of density-only and temperature-only fluctuations, a positive correlation between density and temperature reduces the filling factor and ADF (from optical CELs), whereas a negative correlation increases both, eventually causing the filling factor to exceed unity. This result suggests that real observations can provide constraints on the thermodynamics of small scale fluctuations.

An analytic calculation is made of the effect of plasma density fluctuations on some spectroscopic diagnostics commonly used in the study of HII regions and planetary nebulae. To permit an analytic treatment, attention is restricted to the case of density fluctuations possessing an exponential probability distribution function (pdf). The present investigation is made in support of a completely numerical and more extensive study of nebular diagnostics by Bergerud et al (2019). Results from this paper are presented in terms of graphs of the observed quantity (spectroscopic line ratio) versus mean nebular density. Our results yield a higher density estimate, given the same observed line ratio, for the case of a nebula with density fluctuations than for the case of a nebula with uniform density. This is qualitatively consistent with the typically observed case, in which the observations lead to the inference of a filling factor < 1. Our results are in quantitative agreement with those of Bergerud et al (2019), and thus corroborate those calculations for the case of an exponential pdf.

Advances in radio spectro-polarimetry offer the possibility to disentangle complex regions where relativistic and thermal plasmas mix in the interstellar and intergalactic media. Recent work has shown that apparently simple Faraday Rotation Measure (RM) spectra can be generated by complex sources. This is true even when the distribution of RMs in the complex source greatly exceeds the errors associated with a single component fit to the peak of the Faraday spectrum. We present a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can differentiate between simple Faraday thin spectra and those that contain multiple or Faraday thick sources. We demonstrate that this CNN, trained for the upcoming Polarisation Sky Survey of the Universe's Magnetism (POSSUM) early science observations, can identify two component sources 99% of the time, provided that the sources are separated in Faraday depth by $>$10% of the FWHM of the Faraday Point Spread Function, the polarized flux ratio of the sources is $>$0.1, and that the Signal-to-Noise radio (S/N) of the primary component is $>$5. With this S/N cut-off, the false positive rate (simple sources mis-classified as complex) is $<$0.3%. Work is ongoing to include Faraday thick sources in the training and testing of the CNN.