Normalized to: Berg, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.02946 [pdf] - 1709340
The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs - Photospheric
parameters of target stars from high-resolution spectroscopy
Passegger, V. M.;
Reiners, A.;
Jeffers, S. V.;
Berg, S. Wende-von;
Schoefer, P.;
Caballero, J. A.;
Schweitzer, A.;
Amado, P. J.;
Bejar, V. J. S.;
Cortes-Contreras, M.;
Hatzes, A. P.;
Kuerster, M.;
Montes, D.;
Pedraz, S.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Ribas, I.;
Seifert, W.
Submitted: 2018-02-08
The new CARMENES instrument comprises two high-resolution and high-stability
spectrographs that are used to search for habitable planets around M dwarfs in
the visible and near-infrared regime via the Doppler technique. Characterising
our target sample is important for constraining the physical properties of any
planetary systems that are detected. The aim of this paper is to determine the
fundamental stellar parameters of the CARMENES M-dwarf target sample from
high-resolution spectra observed with CARMENES. We also include several M-dwarf
spectra observed with other high-resolution spectrographs, that is CAFE, FEROS,
and HRS, for completeness. We used a {chi}^2 method to derive the stellar
parameters effective temperature T_eff, surface gravity log g, and metallicity
[Fe/H] of the target stars by fitting the most recent version of the
PHOENIX-ACES models to high-resolution spectroscopic data. These stellar
atmosphere models incorporate a new equation of state to describe spectral
features of low-temperature stellar atmospheres. Since T_eff, log g, and [Fe/H]
show degeneracies, the surface gravity is determined independently using
stellar evolutionary models. We derive the stellar parameters for a total of
300 stars. The fits achieve very good agreement between the PHOENIX models and
observed spectra. We estimate that our method provides parameters with
uncertainties of {sigma} T_eff = 51 K, {sigma} log g = 0.07, and {sigma} [Fe/H]
= 0.16, and show that atmosphere models for low-mass stars have significantly
improved in the last years. Our work also provides an independent test of the
new PHOENIX-ACES models, and a comparison for other methods using
low-resolution spectra. In particular, our effective temperatures agree well
with literature values, while metallicities determined with our method exhibit
a larger spread when compared to literature results.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.01877 [pdf] - 1359174
Fundamental M-dwarf parameters from high-resolution spectra using
PHOENIX ACES models: I. Parameter accuracy and benchmark stars
Submitted: 2016-01-08
M-dwarf stars are the most numerous stars in the Universe; they span a wide
range in mass and are in the focus of ongoing and planned exoplanet surveys. To
investigate and understand their physical nature, detailed spectral information
and accurate stellar models are needed. We use a new synthetic atmosphere model
generation and compare model spectra to observations. To test the model
accuracy, we compared the models to four benchmark stars with atmospheric
parameters for which independent information from interferometric radius
measurements is available. We used $\chi^2$ -based methods to determine
parameters from high-resolution spectroscopic observations. Our synthetic
spectra are based on the new PHOENIX grid that uses the ACES description for
the equation of state. This is a model generation expected to be especially
suitable for the low-temperature atmospheres. We identified suitable spectral
tracers of atmospheric parameters and determined the uncertainties in $T_{\rm
eff}$, $\log{g}$, and [Fe/H] resulting from degeneracies between parameters and
from shortcomings of the model atmospheres. The inherent uncertainties we find
are {\sigma}$T_{\rm eff}$= 35 K, {\sigma}$\log{g}$ = 0.14, and {\sigma}[Fe/H] =
0.11. The new model spectra achieve a reliable match to our observed data; our
results for $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log{g}$ are consistent with literature values
to within 1{\sigma}. However, metallicities reported from earlier photometric
and spectroscopic calibrations in some cases disagree with our results by more
than 3 {\sigma}. A possible explanation are systematic errors in earlier
metallicity determinations that were based on insufficient descriptions of the
cool atmospheres. At this point, however, we cannot definitely identify the
reason for this discrepancy, but our analysis indicates that there is a large
uncertainty in the accuracy of M-dwarf parameter estimates.