Stars form in highly-magnetised, supersonic turbulent molecular clouds. Many of the tools and models that we use to carry out star formation studies rely upon the assumption of cloud isotropy. However, structures like high-density filaments in the presence of magnetic fields, and magnetosonic striations introduce anisotropies into the cloud. In this study we use the two-dimensional (2D) power spectrum to perform a systematic analysis of the anisotropies in the column density for a range of Alfv\'en Mach numbers ($\mathcal{M}_A=0.1$--$10$) and turbulent Mach numbers ($\mathcal{M}=2$--$20$), with 20 high-resolution, three-dimensional (3D) turbulent magnetohydrodynamic simulations. We find that for cases with a strong magnetic guide field, corresponding to $\mathcal{M}_A<1$, and $\mathcal{M}\lesssim 4$, the anisotropy in the column density is dominated by thin striations aligned with the magnetic field, while for $\mathcal{M}\gtrsim 4$ the anisotropy is significantly changed by high-density filaments that form perpendicular to the magnetic guide field. Indeed, the strength of the magnetic field controls the degree of anisotropy and whether or not any anisotropy is present, but it is the turbulent motions controlled by $\mathcal{M}$ that determine which kind of anisotropy dominates the morphology of a cloud.

Supersonic turbulence is a key player in controlling the structure and star formation potential of molecular clouds (MCs). The three-dimensional (3D) turbulent Mach number, $\mathcal{M}$, allows us to predict the rate of star formation. However, determining Mach numbers in observations is challenging because it requires accurate measurements of the velocity dispersion. Moreover, observations are limited to two-dimensional (2D) projections of the MCs and velocity information can usually only be obtained for the line-of-sight component. Here we present a new method that allows us to estimate $\mathcal{M}$ from the 2D column density, $\Sigma$, by analysing the fractal dimension, $\mathcal{D}$. We do this by computing $\mathcal{D}$ for six simulations, ranging between $1$ and $100$ in $\mathcal{M}$. From this data we are able to construct an empirical relation, $\log\mathcal{M}(\mathcal{D}) = \xi_1(\text{erfc}^{-1} [(\mathcal{D}-\mathcal{D}_{\text{min}})/\Omega] + \xi_2),$ where $\text{erfc}^{-1}$ is the inverse complimentary error function, $\mathcal{D}_{\text{min}} = 1.55 \pm 0.13$ is the minimum fractal dimension of $\Sigma$, $\Omega = 0.22 \pm 0.07$, $\xi_1 = 0.9 \pm 0.1$ and $\xi_2 = 0.2 \pm 0.2$. We test the accuracy of this new relation on column density maps from $Herschel$ observations of two quiescent subregions in the Polaris Flare MC, `saxophone' and `quiet'. We measure $\mathcal{M} \sim 10$ and $\mathcal{M} \sim 2$ for the subregions, respectively, which is similar to previous estimates based on measuring the velocity dispersion from molecular line data. These results show that this new empirical relation can provide useful estimates of the cloud kinematics, solely based upon the geometry from the column density of the cloud.

Observations of interstellar gas clouds are typically limited to two-dimensional (2D) projections of the intrinsically three-dimensional (3D) structure of the clouds. In this study, we present a novel method for relating the 2D projected fractal dimension ($\mathcal{D}_{\text{p}}$) to the 3D fractal dimension ($\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D}}$) of turbulent clouds. We do this by computing the fractal dimension of clouds over two orders of magnitude in turbulent Mach number $(\mathcal{M} = 1-100)$, corresponding to seven orders of magnitude in spatial scales within the clouds. This provides us with the data to create a new empirical relation between $\mathcal{D}_{\text{p}}$ and $\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D}}$. The proposed relation is $\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D}}(\mathcal{D}_{\text{p}}) = \Omega_1 erfc ( \xi_1 erfc^{-1}[ (\mathcal{D}_{\text{p}} - \mathcal{D}_{\text{p,min}})/\Omega_2 ] + \xi_2 ) + \mathcal{D}_{\text{3D,min}}$, where the minimum 3D fractal dimension, $\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D,min}} = 2.06 \pm 0.35$, the minimum projected fractal dimension, $\mathcal{D}_{\text{p,min}} = 1.55 \pm 0.13$, $\Omega_1 = 0.47 \pm 0.18$, $\Omega_2 = 0.22 \pm 0.07$, $\xi_1 = 0.80 \pm 0.18$ and $\xi_2 = 0.26 \pm 0.19$. The minimum 3D fractal dimension, $\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D,min}} = 2.06 \pm 0.35$, indicates that in the high $\mathcal{M}$ limit the 3D clouds are dominated by planar shocks. The relation between $\mathcal{D}_{\text{p}}$ and $\mathcal{D}_{\text{3D}}$ of molecular clouds may be a useful tool for those who are seeking to understand the 3D structures of molecular clouds, purely based upon 2D projected data and shows promise for relating the physics of the turbulent clouds to the fractal dimension.