Normalized to: Baumer, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.04838 [pdf] - 1745972
The STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey (STRIDES) 2016
follow-up campaign. I. Overview and classification of candidates selected by
two techniques
Treu, T.;
Agnello, A.;
Baumer, M. A.;
Birrer, S.;
Buckley-Geer, E. J.;
Courbin, F.;
Kim, Y. J.;
Lim, H.;
Marshall, P. J.;
Nord, B.;
Schechter, P. L.;
Sivakumar, P. R.;
Abramson, L. E.;
Anguita, T.;
Apostolovski, Y.;
Auger, M. W.;
Chan, J. H. H.;
Chen, G. C. F.;
Collett, T. E.;
Fassnacht, C. D.;
Hsueh, J. -W.;
Lemon, C.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Motta, V.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Rojas, K.;
Rusu, C. E.;
Williams, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Meylan, G.;
Suyu, S. H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Brooks, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2018-08-14, last modified: 2018-09-05
The primary goals of the STRong lensing Insights into the Dark Energy Survey
(STRIDES) collaboration are to measure the dark energy equation of state
parameter and the free streaming length of dark matter. To this aim, STRIDES is
discovering strongly lensed quasars in the imaging data of the Dark Energy
Survey and following them up to measure time delays, high resolution imaging,
and spectroscopy sufficient to construct accurate lens models. In this paper,
we first present forecasts for STRIDES. Then, we describe the STRIDES
classification scheme, and give an overview of the Fall 2016 follow-up
campaign. We continue by detailing the results of two selection methods, the
Outlier Selection Technique and a morphological algorithm, and presenting lens
models of a system, which could possibly be a lensed quasar in an unusual
configuration. We conclude with the summary statistics of the Fall 2016
campaign. Including searches presented in companion papers (Anguita et al.;
Ostrovski et al.), STRIDES followed up 117 targets identifying 7 new strongly
lensed systems, and 7 nearly identical quasars (NIQs), which could be confirmed
as lenses by the detection of the lens galaxy. 76 candidates were rejected and
27 remain otherwise inconclusive, for a success rate in the range 6-35\%. This
rate is comparable to that of previous searches like SQLS even though the
parent dataset of STRIDES is purely photometric and our selection of candidates
cannot rely on spectroscopic information.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.07400 [pdf] - 1585046
Is Flat Fielding Safe for Precision CCD Astronomy?
Submitted: 2017-06-22
The ambitious goals of precision cosmology with wide-field optical surveys
such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
(LSST) demand, as their foundation, precision CCD astronomy. This in turn
requires an understanding of previously uncharacterized sources of systematic
error in CCD sensors, many of which manifest themselves as static effective
variations in pixel area. Such variation renders a critical assumption behind
the traditional procedure of flat fielding--that a sensor's pixels comprise a
uniform grid--invalid. In this work, we present a method to infer a curl-free
model of a sensor's underlying pixel grid from flat field images, incorporating
the superposition of all electrostatic sensor effects--both known and
unknown--present in flat field data. We use these pixel grid models to estimate
the overall impact of sensor systematics on photometry, astrometry, and PSF
shape measurements in a representative sensor from the Dark Energy Camera
(DECam) and a prototype LSST sensor. Applying the method to DECam data recovers
known significant sensor effects for which corrections are currently being
developed within DES. For an LSST prototype CCD with pixel-response
non-uniformity (PRNU) of 0.4%, we find the impact of "improper" flat-fielding
on these observables is negligible in nominal .7" seeing conditions. These
errors scale linearly with the PRNU, so for future LSST production sensors,
which may have larger PRNU, our method provides a way to assess whether
pixel-level calibration beyond flat fielding will be required.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.06148 [pdf] - 1311934
Space Warps: I. Crowd-sourcing the Discovery of Gravitational Lenses
Marshall, Philip J.;
Verma, Aprajita;
More, Anupreeta;
Davis, Christopher P.;
More, Surhud;
Kapadia, Amit;
Parrish, Michael;
Snyder, Chris;
Wilcox, Julianne;
Baeten, Elisabeth;
Macmillan, Christine;
Cornen, Claude;
Baumer, Michael;
Simpson, Edwin;
Lintott, Chris J.;
Miller, David;
Paget, Edward;
Simpson, Robert;
Smith, Arfon M.;
Küng, Rafael;
Saha, Prasenjit;
Collett, Thomas E.;
Tecza, Matthias
Submitted: 2015-04-21, last modified: 2015-09-01
We describe Space Warps, a novel gravitational lens discovery service that
yields samples of high purity and completeness through crowd-sourced visual
inspection. Carefully produced colour composite images are displayed to
volunteers via a web- based classification interface, which records their
estimates of the positions of candidate lensed features. Images of simulated
lenses, as well as real images which lack lenses, are inserted into the image
stream at random intervals; this training set is used to give the volunteers
instantaneous feedback on their performance, as well as to calibrate a model of
the system that provides dynamical updates to the probability that a classified
image contains a lens. Low probability systems are retired from the site
periodically, concentrating the sample towards a set of lens candidates. Having
divided 160 square degrees of Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey
(CFHTLS) imaging into some 430,000 overlapping 82 by 82 arcsecond tiles and
displaying them on the site, we were joined by around 37,000 volunteers who
contributed 11 million image classifications over the course of 8 months. This
Stage 1 search reduced the sample to 3381 images containing candidates; these
were then refined in Stage 2 to yield a sample that we expect to be over 90%
complete and 30% pure, based on our analysis of the volunteers performance on
training images. We comment on the scalability of the SpaceWarps system to the
wide field survey era, based on our projection that searches of 10$^5$ images
could be performed by a crowd of 10$^5$ volunteers in 6 days.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.06088 [pdf] - 984029
Intrinsic Pixel Size Variation in an LSST Prototype Sensor
Submitted: 2015-04-23
The ambitious science goals of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)
have motivated a search for new and unexpected sources of systematic error in
the LSST camera. Flat-field images are a rich source of data on sensor
anomalies, although such effects are typically dwarfed by shot noise in a
single flat field. After combining many ($\sim 500$) such images into
`ultraflats' to reduce the impact of shot noise, we perform photon transfer
analysis on a pixel-by-pixel basis and observe no spatial structure in pixel
linearity or gain at light levels of 100 ke$^-$ and below. At 125 ke$^-$, a
columnar structure is observed in the gain map--we attribute this to a
flux-dependent charge transfer inefficiency. We also probe small-scale
variations in effective pixel size by analyzing pixel-neighbor correlations in
ultraflat images, where we observe clear evidence of intrinsic variation in
effective pixel size in an LSST prototype sensor near the $\sim .3\%$ level.