Normalized to: Bashi, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01982 [pdf] - 1918397
Small Planets in the Galactic Context: Host Star Kinematics, Iron, and
$\alpha$ Element Enhancement
Submitted: 2019-06-05, last modified: 2019-06-24
We explored the occurrence rate of small close-in planets among
$\textit{Kepler}$ target stars as a function of the iron abundance and the
stellar total velocity $V_\mathrm{tot}$. We estimated the occurrence rate of
those planets by combining information from LAMOST and the
California-$\textit{Kepler}$ Survey (CKS) and found that iron-poor stars
exhibit an increase in the occurrence with $V_\mathrm{tot}$ from $f < 0.2$
planets per star at $ V_\mathrm{tot} < 30\ \mathrm{km~s}^{-1}$ to $f \sim 1.2$
at $V_\mathrm{tot} > 90\ \mathrm{km~s}^{-1}$. We suggest this planetary
profusion may be a result of a higher abundance of $\alpha$ elements associated
with iron-poor, high-velocity stars. Furthermore, we have identified an
increase in small planet occurrence with iron abundance, particularly for the
slower stars ($V_\mathrm{tot} < 30\ \mathrm{km~s}^{-1}$), where the occurrence
increased to $f \sim 1.1$ planets per star in the iron-rich domain. Our results
suggest there are two regions in the
$([\mathrm{Fe}/\mathrm{H}],[\alpha/\mathrm{Fe}])$ plane in which stars tend to
form and maintain small planets. We argue that analysis of the effect of
overall metal content on planet occurrence is incomplete without including
information on both iron and $\alpha$ element enhancement.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.10236 [pdf] - 1742144
A Quantitative Comparison of Exoplanet Catalogs
Submitted: 2018-08-30
In this study, we investigated the differences between four commonly-used
exoplanet catalogs (exoplanet.eu; exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu;
openexoplanetcatalogue.com; exoplanets.org) using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS)
test. We found a relatively good agreement in terms of the planetary parameters
(mass, radius, period) and stellar properties (mass, temperature, metallicity),
although a more careful analysis of the overlap and unique parts of each
catalog revealed some differences. We quantified the statistical impact of
these differences and their potential cause. We concluded that although
statistical studies are unlikely to be significantly affected by the choice of
catalog, it would be desirable to have one consistent catalog accepted by the
general exoplanet community as a base for exoplanet statistics and comparison
with theoretical predictions.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.07654 [pdf] - 1581281
Two Empirical Regimes of the Planetary Mass-Radius Relation
Submitted: 2017-01-26
Today, with the large number of detected exoplanets and improved
measurements, we can reach the next step of planetary characterization.
Classifying different populations of planets is not only important for our
understanding of the demographics of various planetary types in the galaxy, but
also for our understanding of planet formation. We explore the nature of two
regimes in the planetary mass-radius (M-R) relation. We suggest that the
transition between the two regimes of "small" and "large" planets, occurs at a
mass of 124 \pm 7, M_Earth and a radius of 12.1 \pm 0.5, R_Earth. Furthermore,
the M-R relation is R \propto M^{0.55\pm 0.02} and R \propto M^{0.01\pm0.02}
for small and large planets, respectively. We suggest that the location of the
breakpoint is linked to the onset of electron degeneracy in hydrogen, and
therefore, to the planetary bulk composition. Specifically, it is the
characteristic minimal mass of a planet which consists of mostly hydrogen and
helium, and therefore its M-R relation is determined by the equation of state
of these materials. We compare the M-R relation from observational data with
the one derived by population synthesis calculations and show that there is a
good qualitative agreement between the two samples.