Normalized to: Baruah, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.2923 [pdf] - 1209495
Orientation Bias of Optically Selected Galaxy Clusters and Its Impact on
Stacked Weak Lensing Analyses
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Zhang, Yuanyuan;
Song, Jeeseon;
Davis, Christopher P.;
McKay, Timothy A.;
Baruah, Leon;
Becker, Matthew;
Benoist, Christophe;
Busha, Michael;
da Costa, Luiz A. N.;
Hao, Jiangang;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Miller, Christopher J.;
Ogando, Ricardo;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Rykoff, Eli;
Wechsler, Risa
Submitted: 2014-05-12, last modified: 2014-06-24
Weak-lensing measurements of the averaged shear profiles of galaxy clusters
binned by some proxy for cluster mass are commonly converted to cluster mass
estimates under the assumption that these cluster stacks have spherical
symmetry. In this paper we test whether this assumption holds for optically
selected clusters binned by estimated optical richness. Using mock catalogues
created from N-body simulations populated realistically with galaxies, we ran a
suite of optical cluster finders and estimated their optical richness. We
binned galaxy clusters by true cluster mass and estimated optical richness and
measure the ellipticity of these stacks. We find that the processes of optical
cluster selection and richness estimation are biased, leading to stacked
structures that are elongated along the line-of-sight. We show that
weak-lensing alone cannot measure the size of this orientation bias. Weak
lensing masses of stacked optically selected clusters are overestimated by up
to 3-6 per cent when clusters can be uniquely associated with haloes. This
effect is large enough to lead to significant biases in the cosmological
parameters derived from large surveys like the Dark Energy Survey, if not
calibrated via simulations or fitted simultaneously. This bias probably also
contributes to the observed discrepancy between the observed and predicted
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich signal of optically-selected clusters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.3056 [pdf] - 1077311
The XMM Cluster Survey: Optical analysis methodology and the first data
release
Mehrtens, Nicola;
Romer, A. Kathy;
Lloyd-Davies, E. J.;
Hilton, Matt;
Miller, Christopher J.;
Stanford, S. A.;
Hosmer, Mark;
Hoyle, Ben;
Collins, Chris A.;
Liddle, Andrew R.;
Viana, Pedro T. P.;
Nichol, Robert C.;
Stott, John P.;
Dubois, E. Naomi;
Kay, Scott T.;
Sahlen, Martin;
Young, Owain;
Short, C. J.;
Christodoulou, L.;
Watson, William A.;
Davidson, Michael;
Harrison, Craig D.;
Baruah, Leon;
Smith, Mathew;
Burke, Claire;
Deadman, Paul-James;
Rooney, Philip J.;
Edmondson, Edward M.;
West, Michael;
Campbell, Heather C.;
Edge, Alastair C.;
Mann, Robert G.;
Wake, David;
Benoist, Christophe;
da Costa, Luiz;
Maia, Marcio A. G.;
Ogando, Ricardo
Submitted: 2011-06-15, last modified: 2011-06-17
The XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) is a serendipitous search for galaxy clusters
using all publicly available data in the XMM-Newton Science Archive. Its main
aims are to measure cosmological parameters and trace the evolution of X-ray
scaling relations. In this paper we present the first data release from the XMM
Cluster Survey (XCS-DR1). This consists of 503 optically confirmed,
serendipitously detected, X-ray clusters. Of these clusters, 255 are new to the
literature and 356 are new X-ray discoveries. We present 464 clusters with a
redshift estimate (0.06 < z < 1.46), including 261 clusters with spectroscopic
redshifts. In addition, we have measured X-ray temperatures (Tx) for 402
clusters (0.4 < Tx < 14.7 keV). We highlight seven interesting subsamples of
XCS-DR1 clusters: (i) 10 clusters at high redshift (z > 1.0, including a new
spectroscopically-confirmed cluster at z = 1.01); (ii) 67 clusters with high Tx
(> 5 keV); (iii) 131 clusters/groups with low Tx (< 2 keV); (iv) 27 clusters
with measured Tx values in the SDSS `Stripe 82' co-add region; (v) 78 clusters
with measured Tx values in the Dark Energy Survey region; (vi) 40 clusters
detected with sufficient counts to permit mass measurements (under the
assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium); (vii) 105 clusters that can be used for
applications such as the derivation of cosmological parameters and the
measurement of cluster scaling relations. The X-ray analysis methodology used
to construct and analyse the XCS-DR1 cluster sample has been presented in a
companion paper, Lloyd-Davies et al. (2010).