Normalized to: Bambach, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.4712 [pdf] - 894660
Analysis of periodicity of extinction using the 2012 geological time
scale
Submitted: 2013-10-17, last modified: 2013-12-06
Analysis of two independent data sets with increased taxonomic resolution
(genera rather than families) using the revised 2012 time scale reveals that an
extinction periodicity first detected by Raup and Sepkoski (1984) for only the
post-Paleozoic actually runs through the entire Phanerozoic. Although there is
not a local peak of extinction every 27 million years, an excess of the
fraction of genus extinction by interval follows a 27 million year timing
interval and differs from a random distribution at the p ~ 0.02 level. A 27
million year periodicity in the spectrum of interval lengths no longer appears,
removing the question of a possible artifact arising from it. Using a method
originally developed in Bambach (2006) we identify 19 intervals of marked
extinction intensity, including mass extinctions, spanning the last 470 million
years (and with another six present in the Cambrian) and find that 10 of the 19
lie within 3 Myr of the maxima in the spacing of the 27 Myr periodicity, which
differs from a random distribution at the p = 0.004 level. These 19 intervals
of marked extinction intensity also preferentially occur during decreasing
diversity phases of a well-known 62 Myr periodicity in diversity (16 of 19, p =
0.002). Both periodicities appear to enhance the likelihood of increased
severity of extinction, but the cause of neither periodicity is known.
Variations in the strength of the many suggested causes of extinction coupled
to the variation in combined effect of the two different periodicities as they
shift in and out of phase is surely one of the reasons that definitive
comparative study of the causes of major extinction events is so elusive.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.1884 [pdf] - 695623
Do Periodicities in Extinction -- with Possible Astronomical Connections
-- Survive a Revision of the Geological Timescale?
Submitted: 2013-07-07
A major revision of the geological timescale was published in 2012. We
re-examine our past finding of a 27 Myr periodicity in marine extinction rates
by re-assigning dates to the extinction data used previously. We find that the
spectral power at this period is somewhat increased, and persists at a narrow
bandwidth, which supports our previous contention that the Nemesis hypothesis
is untenable as an explanation for the periodicity that was first noted by Raup
and Sepkoski in the 1980s. We enumerate a number of problems in a recent study
comparing extinction rates with time series models.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.1804 [pdf] - 522681
A ~60 Myr periodicity is common to marine-87Sr/86Sr, fossil
biodiversity, and large-scale sedimentation: what does the periodicity
reflect?
Submitted: 2012-06-08
We find that the marine 87Sr/86Sr record shows a significant periodicity of
59.3 \pm 3 Myr. The 87Sr/86Sr record is 171{\deg} \pm 12{\deg}out of phase with
a 62 (\pm 3) Myr periodicity previously reported in the record of marine-animal
diversity. These periodicities are close to 58 (\pm 4) Myr cycles found for the
number of gap-bounded sedimentary carbonate packages of North America We
propose that these periodicities reflect the operation of a periodic "pulse of
the Earth" in large-scale, Earth processes. These may be linked to mantle or
plate-tectonic events, possibly uplift, which affects Earth's climate and
oceans, and so the geochemistry, sedimentation, and biodiversity of the marine
realm. Alternately, they may be linked to oscillation of the solar system
normal to the plane of the galaxy.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4496 [pdf] - 389833
A ubiquitous ~62 Myr periodic fluctuation superimposed on general trends
in fossil biodiversity: II, Evolutionary dynamics associated with periodic
fluctuation in marine diversity
Submitted: 2010-11-19
We investigate evolutionary dynamics related to periodicity fossil
biodiversity. Coherent periodic fluctuation in origination/extinction of marine
genera that survive <45 million years is the source of an observed ~62 million
year periodicity analyzed in Paper I. We also show that the evolutionary
dynamics of "long-lived" genera (those that survive >45 million years) do not
participate in the periodic fluctuation in diversity and differ from those of
"short-lived" genera. The difference between the evolutionary dynamics of these
2 genera classes indicates that the periodic pattern is not an artifact of
variation in quality of the geologic record. The interplay of these two
previously undifferentiated systems, together with the secular increase in
abundance of "long-lived" genera, is probably the source of heretofore
unexplained differences in evolutionary dynamics between the Paleozoic and
post-Paleozoic as reported by others. Testing for cycles similar to the 62 Myr
cycle in fossil biodiversity superimposed on the long-term trends of the
Phanerozoic as described in Paper I, we find a significant (but weaker) signal
in sedimentary rock packages, particularly carbonates, which suggests a
connection. The presence of a periodic pattern in evolutionary dynamics of the
vulnerable "short-lived" component of marine fauna demonstrates that a
long-term periodic fluctuation in environmental conditions capable of affecting
evolution in the marine realm characterizes our planet. Coincidence in timing
is more consistent with a common cause than sampling bias. A previously
identified set of mass extinctions preferentially occur during the declining
phase of the 62 Myr periodicity, supporting the idea that the periodicity
relates to variation in biotically important stresses. Further work should
focus on finding links to physical phenomena that might reveal the causal
system or systems.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.4393 [pdf] - 268631
A ubiquitous ~62-Myr periodic fluctuation superimposed on general trends
in fossil biodiversity. I. Documentation
Submitted: 2010-05-24, last modified: 2010-08-25
We use Fourier analysis and related techniques to investigate the question of
periodicities in fossil biodiversity. These techniques are able to identify
cycles superimposed on the long-term trends of the Phanerozoic. We review prior
results and analyze data previously reduced and published. Joint time-series
analysis of various reductions of the Sepkoski Data, Paleobiology Database, and
Fossil Record 2 indicate the same periodicity in biodiversity of marine animals
at 62 Myr. We have not found this periodicity in the terrestrial fossil record.
We have found that the signal strength decreases with time because of the
accumulation of apparently "resistant" long-lived genera. The existence of a
62-Myr periodicity despite very different treatment of systematic error,
particularly sampling-strength biases, in all three major databases strongly
argues for its reality in the fossil record.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.0437 [pdf] - 216477
Nemesis Reconsidered
Submitted: 2010-07-02
The hypothesis of a companion object (Nemesis) orbiting the Sun was motivated
by the claim of a terrestrial extinction periodicity, thought to be mediated by
comet showers. The orbit of a distant companion to the Sun is expected to be
perturbed by the Galactic tidal field and encounters with passing stars, which
will induce variation in the period. We examine the evidence for the previously
proposed periodicity, using two modern, greatly improved paleontological
datasets of fossil biodiversity. We find that there is a narrow peak at 27 My
in the cross-spectrum of extinction intensity time series between these
independent datasets. This periodicity extends over a time period nearly twice
that for which it was originally noted. An excess of extinction events are
associated with this periodicity at 99% confidence. In this sense we confirm
the originally noted feature in the time series for extinction. However, we
find that it displays extremely regular timing for about 0.5 Gy. The regularity
of the timing compared with earlier calculations of orbital perturbation would
seem to exclude the Nemesis hypothesis as a causal factor.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.3153 [pdf] - 214760
Nemesis Reconsidered
Submitted: 2010-07-02
The hypothesis of a companion object (Nemesis) orbiting the Sun was motivated
by the claim of a terrestrial extinction periodicity, thought to be mediated by
comet showers. The orbit of a distant companion to the Sun is expected to be
perturbed by the Galactic tidal field and encounters with passing stars, which
will induce variation in the period. We examine the evidence for the previously
proposed periodicity, using two modern, greatly improved paleontological
datasets of fossil biodiversity. We find that there is a narrow peak at 27 My
in the cross-spectrum of extinction intensity time series between these
independent datasets. This periodicity extends over a time period nearly twice
that for which it was originally noted. An excess of extinction events are
associated with this periodicity at 99% confidence. In this sense we confirm
the originally noted feature in the time series for extinction. However, we
find that it displays extremely regular timing for about 0.5 Gy. The regularity
of the timing compared with earlier calculations of orbital perturbation would
seem to exclude the Nemesis hypothesis as a causal factor.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.3449 [pdf] - 32961
An ubiquitous ~62 Myr periodic fluctuation superimposed on general
trends in fossil biodiversity
Submitted: 2010-01-19
A 62 Myr periodicity is superimposed on other longer-term trends in fossil
biodiversity. This cycle can be discerned in marine data based on the Sepkoski
compendium, the Paleobiology Database, and the Fossil Record 2. The signal also
exists in changes in sea level/sediment, but is much weaker than in
biodiversity itself. A significant excess of 19 previously identified
Phanerozoic mass extinctions occur on the declining phase of the 62 Myr cycle.
appearance of the signal in sampling-standardized biodiversity data, it is
likely not to be a sampling artifact, but either a consequence of sea-level
changes or an additional effect of some common cause for them both. In either
case, it is intriguing why both changes would have a regular pattern.