Normalized to: Bains, W.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.05224 [pdf] - 2046281
Phosphine as a Biosignature Gas in Exoplanet Atmospheres
Submitted: 2019-10-11, last modified: 2019-10-28
A long-term goal of exoplanet studies is the identification and detection of
biosignature gases. Beyond the most discussed biosignature gas O$_2$, only a
handful of gases have been considered in detail. Here we evaluate phosphine
(PH$_3$). On Earth, PH$_3$ is associated with anaerobic ecosystems, and as such
is a potential biosignature gas on anoxic exoplanets.
We simulate CO$_2-$ and H$_2-$dominated habitable terrestrial planet
atmospheres. We find that PH$_3$ can accumulate to detectable concentrations on
planets with surface production fluxes of 10$^{10}$-10$^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$
s$^{-1}$ (corresponding to surface concentrations of 10s of ppb to 100s of
ppm), depending on atmospheric composition and UV flux. While high, such
surface fluxes are comparable to the global terrestrial production rate of
CH$_4$ (10$^{11}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) and below the maximum local terrestrial
PH$_3$ production rate (10$^{14}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$). As with other gases,
PH$_3$ can more readily accumulate on low-UV planets, e.g. planets orbiting
quiet M-dwarfs or with a photochemical UV shield.
If detected, PH$_3$ is a promising biosignature gas, as it has no known
abiotic false positives on terrestrial planets that could generate the high
fluxes required for detection. PH$_3$ also has 3 strong spectral features such
that in any atmosphere scenario 1 of the 3 will be unique compared to other
dominant spectroscopic molecules. PH$_3$'s weakness as a biosignature gas is
its high reactivity, requiring high outgassing for detectability. We calculate
that 10s of hours of JWST time are required for a potential detection of
PH$_3$. Yet because PH$_3$ is spectrally active in the same wavelength regions
as other atmospherically important molecules (e.g., H$_2$O and CH$_4$),
searches for PH$_3$ can be carried out at no additional observational cost to
searches for other molecules relevant to exoplanet habitability.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.06381 [pdf] - 1677230
Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment
Catling, David C.;
Krissansen-Totton, Joshua;
Kiang, Nancy Y.;
Crisp, David;
Robinson, Tyler D.;
DasSarma, Shiladitya;
Rushby, Andrew;
Del Genio, Anthony;
Bains, William;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn
Submitted: 2017-05-17, last modified: 2018-05-03
Finding life on exoplanets from telescopic observations is an ultimate goal
of exoplanet science. Life produces gases and other substances, such as
pigments, which can have distinct spectral or photometric signatures. Whether
or not life is found with future data must be expressed with probabilities,
requiring a framework of biosignature assessment. We present a framework in
which we advocate using biogeochemical "Exo-Earth System" models to simulate
potential biosignatures in spectra or photometry. Given actual observations,
simulations are used to find the Bayesian likelihoods of those data occurring
for scenarios with and without life. The latter includes "false positives"
where abiotic sources mimic biosignatures. Prior knowledge of factors
influencing planetary inhabitation, including previous observations, is
combined with the likelihoods to give the Bayesian posterior probability of
life existing on a given exoplanet. Four components of observation and analysis
are necessary. 1) Characterization of stellar (e.g., age and spectrum) and
exoplanetary system properties, including "external" exoplanet parameters
(e.g., mass and radius) to determine an exoplanet's suitability for life. 2)
Characterization of "internal" exoplanet parameters (e.g., climate) to evaluate
habitability. 3) Assessment of potential biosignatures within the environmental
context (components 1-2) and any corroborating evidence. 4) Exclusion of false
positives. The resulting posterior Bayesian probabilities of life's existence
map to five confidence levels, ranging from "very likely" (90-100%) to "very
unlikely" ($\le$10%) inhabited.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.08071 [pdf] - 1712836
Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions
Walker, Sara I.;
Bains, William;
Cronin, Leroy;
DasSarma, Shiladitya;
Danielache, Sebastian;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn;
Kacar, Betul;
Kiang, Nancy Y.;
Lenardic, Adrian;
Reinhard, Christopher T.;
Moore, William;
Schwieterman, Edward W.;
Shkolnik, Evgenya L.;
Smith, Harrison B.
Submitted: 2017-05-23, last modified: 2017-08-08
Exoplanet science promises a continued rapid accumulation of new observations
in the near future, energizing a drive to understand and interpret the
forthcoming wealth of data to identify signs of life beyond our Solar System.
The large statistics of exoplanet samples, combined with the ambiguity of our
understanding of universal properties of life and its signatures, necessitate a
quantitative framework for biosignature assessment Here, we introduce a
Bayesian framework for guiding future directions in life detection, which
permits the possibility of generalizing our search strategy beyond
biosignatures of known life. The Bayesian methodology provides a language to
define quantitatively the conditional probabilities and confidence levels of
future life detection and, importantly, may constrain the prior probability of
life with or without positive detection. We describe empirical and theoretical
work necessary to place constraints on the relevant likelihoods, including
those emerging from stellar and planetary context, the contingencies of
evolutionary history and the universalities of physics and chemistry. We
discuss how the Bayesian framework can guide our search strategies, including
determining observational wavelengths or deciding between targeted searches or
larger, lower resolution surveys. Our goal is to provide a quantitative
framework not entrained to specific definitions of life or its signatures,
which integrates the diverse disciplinary perspectives necessary to confidently
detect alien life.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.6014 [pdf] - 1179442
A Biomass-based Model to Estimate the Plausibility of Exoplanet
Biosignature Gases
Submitted: 2013-09-23
Biosignature gas detection is one of the ultimate future goals for exoplanet
atmosphere studies. We have created a framework for linking biosignature gas
detectability to biomass estimates, including atmospheric photochemistry and
biological thermodynamics. The new framework is intended to liberate predictive
atmosphere models from requiring fixed, Earth-like biosignature gas source
fluxes. New biosignature gases can be considered with a check that the biomass
estimate is physically plausible. We have validated the models on terrestrial
production of NO, H2S, CH4, CH3Cl, and DMS. We have applied the models to
propose NH3 as a biosignature gas on a "cold Haber World," a planet with a
N2-H2 atmosphere, and to demonstrate why gases such as CH3Cl must have too
large of a biomass to be a plausible biosignature gas on planets with Earth or
early-Earth-like atmospheres orbiting a Sun-like star. To construct the biomass
models, we developed a functional classification of biosignature gases, and
found that gases (such as CH4, H2S, and N2O) produced from life that extracts
energy from chemical potential energy gradients will always have false
positives because geochemistry has the same gases to work with as life does,
and gases (such as DMS and CH3Cl) produced for secondary metabolic reasons are
far less likely to have false positives but because of their highly specialized
origin are more likely to be produced in small quantities. The biomass model
estimates are valid to one or two orders of magnitude; the goal is an
independent approach to testing whether a biosignature gas is plausible rather
than a precise quantification of atmospheric biosignature gases and their
corresponding biomasses.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.6016 [pdf] - 1179443
Biosignature Gases in H2-Dominated Atmospheres on Rocky Exoplanets
Submitted: 2013-09-23
(Abridged) Super Earth exoplanets are being discovered with increasing
frequency and some will be able to retain stable H2-dominated atmospheres. We
study biosignature gases on exoplanets with thin H2 atmospheres and habitable
surface temperatures, by using a model atmosphere with photochemistry, and
biomass estimate framework for evaluating the plausibilty of a range of
biosignature gas candidates. We find that photochemically produced H atoms are
the most abundant reactive species in H2 atmospheres. In atmospheres with high
CO2 levels, atomic O is the major destructive species for some molecules. In
sun-Earth-like UV radiation environments, H (and in some cases O) will rapidly
destroy nearly all biosignature gases of interest. The lower UV fluxes from UV
quiet M stars would produce a lower concentration of H (or O) for the same
scenario, enabling some biosignature gases to accumulate. The favorability of
low-UV radiation environments to in an H2 atmosphere is closely analogous to
the case of oxidized atmospheres, where photochemically produced OH is the
major destructive species. Most potential biosignature gases, such as DMS and
CH3Cl are therefore more favorable in low UV, as compared to solar-like UV,
environments. A few promising biosignature gas candidates, including NH3 and
N2O, are favorable even in solar-like UV environments, as these gases are
destroyed directly by photolysis and not by H (or O). A more subtle finding is
that most gases produced by life that are fully hydrogenated forms of an
element, such as CH4, H2S, are not effective signs of life in an H2-rich
atmosphere, because the dominant atmospheric chemistry will generate such gases
abiologically, through photochemistry or geochemistry. Suitable biosignature
gases in H2-rich atmospheres for super Earth exoplanets transiting M stars
could potentially be detected in transmission spectra with the JWST.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1304.4429 [pdf] - 652406
Martian Methyl Chloride. A lesson in uncertainty
Submitted: 2013-04-16
The MSL Lander Curiosity has recently detected methyl halides coming from
heated samples of Martian soil. This is reminiscent of similar findings in the
Viking Lander spacecraft. In the 1970s a consensus developed quickly explaining
the methyl halides as contamination originating from the spacecraft, and
ignoring lines of evidence that the two compounds originated from Mars, and
that they could not have originated from the proposed spacecraft chemistry. I
discuss why this consensus developed from the understanding of biochemistry and
geochemistry of 1976, despite its implausibility. Subsequent explanations for
the Viking methyl halides are more plausible but still not proven. The
Curiosity rover results are also being explained as a result of on-spacecraft
chemistry. I urge caution in this interpretation, in light of the historical
Viking example: it is better to leave unexplained data unexplained than to lock
in an explanation that precludes future developments.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.6603 [pdf] - 1164873
Photochemistry in Terrestrial Exoplanet Atmospheres II: H2S and SO2
Photochemistry in Anoxic Atmospheres
Submitted: 2013-02-26
Sulfur gases are common components in the volcanic and biological emission on
Earth, and are expected to be important input gases for atmospheres on
terrestrial exoplanets. We study the atmospheric composition and the spectra of
terrestrial exoplanets with sulfur compounds (i.e., H2S and SO2) emitted from
their surfaces. We use a comprehensive one-dimensional photochemistry model and
radiative transfer model to investigate the sulfur chemistry in atmospheres
ranging from reducing to oxidizing. The most important finding is that both H2S
and SO2 are chemically short-lived in virtually all types of atmospheres on
terrestrial exoplanets, based on models of H2, N2, and CO2 atmospheres. This
implies that direct detection of surface sulfur emission is unlikely, as their
surface emission rates need to be extremely high (>1000 times Earth's volcanic
sulfur emission) for these gases to build up to a detectable level. We also
find that sulfur compounds emitted from the surface lead to photochemical
formation of elemental sulfur and sulfuric acid in the atmosphere, which would
condense to form aerosols if saturated. For terrestrial exoplanets in the
habitable zone of Sun-like stars or M stars, Earth-like sulfur emission rates
result in optically thick haze composed of elemental sulfur in reducing
H2-dominated atmospheres for a wide range of particle diameters (0.1-1 micron),
which is assumed as a free parameter in our simulations. In oxidized
atmospheres composed of N2 and CO2, optically thick haze, composed of elemental
sulfur aerosols (S8) or sulfuric acid aerosols (H2SO4), will form if the
surface sulfur emission is 2 orders of magnitude more than the volcanic sulfur
emission of Earth. Although direct detection of H2S and SO2 by their spectral
features is unlikely, their emission might be inferred by observing
aerosol-related features in reflected light with future generation space
telescopes.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.6885 [pdf] - 1152455
Photochemistry in Terrestrial Exoplanet Atmospheres I: Photochemistry
Model and Benchmark Cases
Submitted: 2012-10-25
We present a comprehensive photochemistry model for exploration of the
chemical composition of terrestrial exoplanet atmospheres. The photochemistry
model is designed from the ground up to have the capacity to treat all types of
terrestrial planet atmospheres, ranging from oxidizing through reducing, which
makes the code suitable for applications for the wide range of anticipated
terrestrial exoplanet compositions. The one-dimensional chemical transport
model treats up to 800 chemical reactions, photochemical processes, dry and wet
deposition, surface emission and thermal escape of O, H, C, N and S bearing
species, as well as formation and deposition of elemental sulfur and sulfuric
acid aerosols. We validate the model by computing the atmospheric composition
of current Earth and Mars and find agreement with observations of major trace
gases in Earth's and Mars' atmospheres. We simulate several plausible
atmospheric scenarios of terrestrial exoplanets, and choose three benchmark
cases for atmospheres from reducing to oxidizing. The most interesting finding
is that atomic hydrogen is always a more abundant reactive radical than the
hydroxyl radical in anoxic atmospheres. Whether atomic hydrogen is the most
important removal path for a molecule of interest also depends on the relevant
reaction rates. We also find that volcanic carbon compounds (i.e., CH4 and CO2)
are chemically long-lived and tend to be well mixed in both reducing and
oxidizing atmospheres, and their dry deposition velocities to the surface
control the atmospheric oxidation states. Furthermore, we revisit whether
photochemically produced oxygen can cause false positives for detecting
oxygenic photosynthesis, and find that in 1-bar CO2-rich atmospheres oxygen and
ozone may build up to levels that have been previously considered unique
signatures of life, if there is no surface emission of reducing gases...