Normalized to: Bae, Y.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.05574 [pdf] - 2127475
Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history
Akutsu, T.;
Ando, M.;
Arai, K.;
Arai, Y.;
Araki, S.;
Araya, A.;
Aritomi, N.;
Aso, Y.;
Bae, S. -W.;
Bae, Y. -B.;
Baiotti, L.;
Bajpai, R.;
Barton, M. A.;
Cannon, K.;
Capocasa, E.;
Chan, M. -L.;
Chen, C. -S.;
Chen, K. -H.;
Chen, Y. -R.;
Chu, H. -Y.;
Chu, Y-K.;
Eguchi, S.;
Enomoto, Y.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fujii, Y.;
Fukunaga, M.;
Fukushima, M.;
Ge, G. -G.;
Hagiwara, A.;
Haino, S.;
Hasegawa, K.;
Hayakawa, H.;
Hayama, K.;
Himemoto, Y.;
Hiranuma, Y.;
Hirata, N.;
Hirose, E.;
Hong, Z.;
Hsieh, B. -H.;
Huang, G. -Z.;
Huang, P. -W.;
Huang, Y. -J.;
Ikenoue, B.;
Imam, S.;
Inayoshi, K.;
Inoue, Y.;
Ioka, K.;
Itoh, Y.;
Izumi, K.;
Jung, K.;
Jung, P.;
Kajita, T.;
Kamiizumi, M.;
Kanda, N.;
Kang, G. -W.;
Kawaguchi, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, J.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimura, N.;
Kita, N.;
Kitazawa, H.;
Kojima, Y.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Komori, K.;
Kong, A. K. H.;
Kotake, K.;
Kozakai, C.;
Kozu, R.;
Kumar, R.;
Kume, J.;
Kuo, C. -M.;
Kuo, H. -S.;
Kuroyanagi, S.;
Kusayanagi, K.;
Kwak, K.;
Lee, H. -K.;
Lee, H. -W.;
Lee, R. -K.;
Leonardi, M.;
Lin, C. -Y.;
Lin, F. -L.;
Lin, L. C. -C.;
Liu, G. -C.;
Luo, L. -W.;
Marchio, M.;
Michimura, Y.;
Mio, N.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Miyamoto, A.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Miyo, K.;
Miyoki, S.;
Morisaki, S.;
Moriwaki, Y.;
Nagano, K.;
Nagano, S.;
Nakamura, K.;
Nakano, H.;
Nakano, M.;
Nakashima, R.;
Narikawa, T.;
Negishi, R.;
Ni, W. -T.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Obuchi, Y.;
Ogaki, W.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. -H.;
Ohashi, M.;
Ohishi, N.;
Ohkawa, M.;
Okutomi, K.;
Oohara, K.;
Ooi, C. -P.;
Oshino, S.;
Pan, K. -C.;
Pang, H. -F.;
Park, J.;
Arellano, F. E. Peña;
Pinto, I.;
Sago, N.;
Saito, S.;
Saito, Y.;
Sakai, K.;
Sakai, Y.;
Sakuno, Y.;
Sato, S.;
Sato, T.;
Sawada, T.;
Sekiguchi, T.;
Sekiguchi, Y.;
Shibagaki, S.;
Shimizu, R.;
Shimoda, T.;
Shimode, K.;
Shinkai, H.;
Shishido, T.;
Shoda, A.;
Somiya, K.;
Son, E. J.;
Sotani, H.;
Sugimoto, R.;
Suzuki, T.;
Suzuki, T.;
Tagoshi, H.;
Takahashi, H.;
Takahashi, R.;
Takamori, A.;
Takano, S.;
Takeda, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Tanaka, H.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanioka, S.;
Martin, E. N. Tapia San;
Telada, S.;
Tomaru, T.;
Tomigami, Y.;
Tomura, T.;
Travasso, F.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, T. T. L.;
Tsubono, K.;
Tsuchida, S.;
Tsuzuki, T.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Uchikata, N.;
Uchiyama, T.;
Ueda, A.;
Uehara, T.;
Ueno, K.;
Ueshima, G.;
Uraguchi, F.;
Ushiba, T.;
van Putten, M. H. P. M.;
Vocca, H.;
Wang, J.;
Wu, C. -M.;
Wu, H. -C.;
Wu, S. -R.;
Xu, W. -R.;
Yamada, T.;
Yamamoto, Ka.;
Yamamoto, Ko.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yokogawa, K.;
Yokoyama, J.;
Yokozawa, T.;
Yoshioka, T.;
Yuzurihara, H.;
Zeidler, S.;
Zhao, Y.;
Zhu, Z. -H.
Submitted: 2020-05-12, last modified: 2020-07-02
KAGRA is a newly built gravitational-wave telescope, a laser interferometer
comprising arms with a length of 3\,km, located in Kamioka, Gifu, Japan. KAGRA
was constructed under the ground and it is operated using cryogenic mirrors
that help in reducing the seismic and thermal noise. Both technologies are
expected to provide directions for the future of gravitational-wave telescopes.
In 2019, KAGRA finished all installations with the designed configuration,
which we call the baseline KAGRA. In this occasion, we present an overview of
the baseline KAGRA from various viewpoints in a series of of articles. In this
article, we introduce the design configurations of KAGRA with its historical
background.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.03013 [pdf] - 2105542
Application of the independent component analysis to the iKAGRA data
KAGRA Collaboration;
Akutsu, T.;
Ando, M.;
Arai, K.;
Arai, Y.;
Araki, S.;
Araya, A.;
Aritomi, N.;
Asada, H.;
Aso, Y.;
Atsuta, S.;
Awai, K.;
Bae, S.;
Bae, Y.;
Baiotti, L.;
Bajpai, R.;
Barton, M. A.;
Cannon, K.;
Capocasa, E.;
Chan, M.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, K.;
Chen, Y.;
Chu, H.;
Chu, Y-K.;
Craig, K.;
Creus, W.;
Doi, K.;
Eda, K.;
Eguchi, S.;
Enomoto, Y.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fujii, Y.;
Fujimoto, M. -K.;
Fukunaga, M.;
Fukushima, M.;
Furuhata, T.;
Ge, G.;
Hagiwara, A.;
Haino, S.;
Hasegawa, K.;
Hashino, K.;
Hayakawa, H.;
Hayama, K.;
Himemoto, Y.;
Hiranuma, Y.;
Hirata, N.;
Hirobayashi, S.;
Hirose, E.;
Hong, Z.;
Hsieh, B. H.;
Huang, G-Z.;
Huang, P.;
Huang, Y.;
Ikenoue, B.;
Imam, S.;
Inayoshi, K.;
Inoue, Y.;
Ioka, K.;
Itoh, Y.;
Izumi, K.;
Jung, K.;
Jung, P.;
Kaji, T.;
Kajita, T.;
Kakizaki, M.;
Kamiizumi, M.;
Kanbara, S.;
Kanda, N.;
Kanemura, S.;
Kaneyama, M.;
Kang, G.;
Kasuya, J.;
Kataoka, Y.;
Kawaguchi, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimura, N.;
Kinugawa, T.;
Kirii, S.;
Kita, N.;
Kitaoka, Y.;
Kitazawa, H.;
Kojima, Y.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Komori, K.;
Kong, A. K. H.;
Kotake, K.;
Kozakai, C.;
Kozu, R.;
Kumar, R.;
Kume, J.;
Kuo, C.;
Kuo, H-S.;
Kuroyanagi, S.;
Kusayanagi, K.;
Kwak, K.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, R.;
Leonardi, M.;
Lin, C.;
Lin, C-Y.;
Lin, F-L.;
Liu, G. C.;
Liu, Y.;
Luo, L.;
Majorana, E.;
Mano, S.;
Marchio, M.;
Matsui, T.;
Matsushima, F.;
Michimura, Y.;
Mio, N.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Miyamoto, A.;
Miyamoto, T.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Miyo, K.;
Miyoki, S.;
Morii, W.;
Morisaki, S.;
Moriwaki, Y.;
Morozumi, T.;
Musha, M.;
Nagano, K.;
Nagano, S.;
Nakamura, K.;
Nakamura, T.;
Nakano, H.;
Nakano, M.;
Nakao, K.;
Nakashima, R.;
Narikawa, T.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Negishi, R.;
Quynh, L. Nguyen;
Ni, W. -T.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Obuchi, Y.;
Ochi, T.;
Ogaki, W.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohashi, M.;
Ohishi, N.;
Ohkawa, M.;
Okutomi, K.;
Oohara, K.;
Ooi, C. P.;
Oshino, S.;
Pan, K.;
Pang, H.;
Park, J.;
Arellano, F. E. Pena;
Pinto, I.;
Sago, N.;
Saijo, M.;
Saito, S.;
Saito, Y.;
Sakai, K.;
Sakai, Y.;
Sakai, Y.;
Sakuno, Y.;
Sasaki, M.;
Sasaki, Y.;
Sato, S.;
Sato, T.;
Sawada, T.;
Sekiguchi, T.;
Sekiguchi, Y.;
Seto, N.;
Shibagaki, S.;
Shibata, M.;
Shimizu, R.;
Shimoda, T.;
Shimode, K.;
Shinkai, H.;
Shishido, T.;
Shoda, A.;
Somiya, K.;
Son, E. J.;
Sotani, H.;
Suemasa, A.;
Sugimoto, R.;
Suzuki, T.;
Suzuki, T.;
Tagoshi, H.;
Takahashi, H.;
Takahashi, R.;
Takamori, A.;
Takano, S.;
Takeda, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Tanaka, H.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanioka, S.;
Martin, E. N. Tapia San;
Tatsumi, D.;
Telada, S.;
Tomaru, T.;
Tomigami, Y.;
Tomura, T.;
Travasso, F.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, T.;
Tsubono, K.;
Tsuchida, S.;
Tsuzuki, T.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Uchikata, N.;
Uchiyama, T.;
Ueda, A.;
Uehara, T.;
Ueki, S.;
Ueno, K.;
Ueshima, G.;
Uraguchi, F.;
Ushiba, T.;
van Putten, M. H. P. M.;
Vocca, H.;
Wada, S.;
Wakamatsu, T.;
Wang, J.;
Wu, C.;
Wu, H.;
Wu, S.;
Xu, W-R.;
Yamada, T.;
Yamamoto, A.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yamamoto, S.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yokogawa, K.;
Yokoyama, J.;
Yokozawa, T.;
Yoon, T. H.;
Yoshioka, T.;
Yuzurihara, H.;
Zeidler, S.;
Zhao, Y.;
Zhu, Z. -H.
Submitted: 2019-08-08, last modified: 2020-06-01
We apply the independent component analysis (ICA) to the real data from a
gravitational wave detector for the first time. Specifically we use the iKAGRA
data taken in April 2016, and calculate the correlations between the
gravitational wave strain channel and 35 physical environmental channels. Using
a couple of seismic channels which are found to be strongly correlated with the
strain, we perform ICA. Injecting a sinusoidal continuous signal in the strain
channel, we find that ICA recovers correct parameters with enhanced
signal-to-noise ratio, which demonstrates usefulness of this method. Among the
two implementations of ICA used here, we find the correlation method yields the
optimal result for the case environmental noises act on the strain channel
linearly.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.00955 [pdf] - 2030547
An arm length stabilization system for KAGRA and future
gravitational-wave detectors
Akutsu, T.;
Ando, M.;
Arai, K.;
Arai, K.;
Arai, Y.;
Araki, S.;
Araya, A.;
Aritomi, N.;
Aso, Y.;
Bae, S.;
Bae, Y.;
Baiotti, L.;
Bajpai, R.;
Barton, M. A.;
Cannon, K.;
Capocasa, E.;
Chan, M.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, K.;
Chen, Y.;
Chu, H.;
Chu, Y-K.;
Doi, K.;
Eguchi, S.;
Enomoto, Y.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fujii, Y.;
Fukunaga, M.;
Fukushima, M.;
Ge, G.;
Hagiwara, A.;
Haino, S.;
Hasegawa, K.;
Hayakawa, H.;
Hayama, K.;
Himemoto, Y.;
Hiranuma, Y.;
Hirata, N.;
Hirose, E.;
Hong, Z.;
Hsieh, B. H.;
Huang, G-Z.;
Huang, P.;
Huang, Y.;
Ikenoue, B.;
Imam, S.;
Inayoshi, K.;
Inoue, Y.;
Ioka, K.;
Itoh, Y.;
Izumi, K.;
Jung, K.;
Jung, P.;
Kajita, T.;
Kamiizumi, M.;
Kanbara, S.;
Kanda, N.;
Kang, G.;
Kawaguchi, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Kawasaki, T.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimura, N.;
Kita, N.;
Kitazawa, H.;
Kojima, Y.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Komori, K.;
Kong, A. K. H.;
Kotake, K.;
Kozakai, C.;
Kozu, R.;
Kumar, R.;
Kume, J.;
Kuo, C.;
Kuo, H-S.;
Kuroyanagi, S.;
Kusayanagi, K.;
Kwak, K.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, R.;
Leonardi, M.;
Lin, L. C. -C.;
Lin, C-Y.;
Lin, F-L.;
Liu, G. C.;
Luo, L. -W.;
Marchio, M.;
Michimura, Y.;
Mio, N.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Miyamoto, A.;
Miyazaki, Y.;
Miyo, K.;
Miyoki, S.;
Morisaki, S.;
Moriwaki, Y.;
Musha, M.;
Nagano, K.;
Nagano, S.;
Nakamura, K.;
Nakano, H.;
Nakano, M.;
Nakashima, R.;
Narikawa, T.;
Negishi, R.;
Ni, W. -T.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Obuchi, Y.;
Ogaki, W.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohashi, M.;
Ohishi, N.;
Ohkawa, M.;
Ohmae, N.;
Okutomi, K.;
Oohara, K.;
Ooi, C. P.;
Oshino, S.;
Pan, K.;
Pang, H.;
Park, J.;
Arellano, F. E. Peña;
Pinto, I.;
Sago, N.;
Saito, S.;
Saito, Y.;
Sakai, K.;
Sakai, Y.;
Sakuno, Y.;
Sato, S.;
Sato, T.;
Sawada, T.;
Sekiguchi, T.;
Sekiguchi, Y.;
Shibagaki, S.;
Shimizu, R.;
Shimoda, T.;
Shimode, K.;
Shinkai, H.;
Shishido, T.;
Shoda, A.;
Somiya, K.;
Son, E. J.;
Sotani, H.;
Sugimoto, R.;
Suzuki, T.;
Suzuki, T.;
Tagoshi, H.;
Takahashi, H.;
Takahashi, R.;
Takamori, A.;
Takano, S.;
Takeda, H.;
Takeda, M.;
Tanaka, H.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, K.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanioka, S.;
Martin, E. N. Tapia San;
Tatsumi, D.;
Telada, S.;
Tomaru, T.;
Tomigami, Y.;
Tomura, T.;
Travasso, F.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, T.;
Tsubono, K.;
Tsuchida, S.;
Tsuzuki, T.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Uchikata, N.;
Uchiyama, T.;
Ueda, A.;
Uehara, T.;
Ueno, K.;
Ueshima, G.;
Uraguchi, F.;
Ushiba, T.;
van Putten, M. H. P. M.;
Vocca, H.;
Wang, J.;
Wu, C.;
Wu, H.;
Wu, S.;
Xu, W-R.;
Yamada, T.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yokogawa, K.;
Yokoyama, J.;
Yokozawa, T.;
Yoshioka, T.;
Yuzurihara, H.;
Zeidler, S.;
Zhao, Y.;
Zhu, Z. -H.
Submitted: 2019-10-02, last modified: 2019-11-28
Modern ground-based gravitational wave (GW) detectors require a complex
interferometer configuration with multiple coupled optical cavities. Since
achieving the resonances of the arm cavities is the most challenging among the
lock acquisition processes, the scheme called arm length stabilization (ALS)
had been employed for lock acquisition of the arm cavities. We designed a new
type of the ALS, which is compatible with the interferometers having long arms
like the next generation GW detectors. The features of the new ALS are that the
control configuration is simpler than those of previous ones and that it is not
necessary to lay optical fibers for the ALS along the kilometer-long arms of
the detector. Along with simulations of its noise performance, an experimental
test of the new ALS was performed utilizing a single arm cavity of KAGRA. This
paper presents the first results of the test where we demonstrated that lock
acquisition of the arm cavity was achieved using the new ALS and residual noise
was measured to be $8.2\,\mathrm{Hz}$ in units of frequency, which is smaller
than the linewidth of the arm cavity and thus low enough to lock the full
interferometer of KAGRA in a repeatable and reliable manner.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.01548 [pdf] - 1581083
Gravitational radiation driven capture in unequal mass black hole
encounters
Submitted: 2017-01-06, last modified: 2017-10-23
The gravitational radiation driven capture (GR capture) between unequal mass
black holes without spins has been investigated with numerical relativistic
simulations. We adopt the parabolic approximation which assumes that the
gravitational wave radiation from a weakly hyperbolic orbit is the same as that
from the parabolic orbit having the same pericenter distance. Using the
radiated energies from the parabolic orbit simulations, we have obtained the
critical impact parameter ($b_{\rm crit}$) for the GR capture for weakly
hyperbolic orbit as a function of initial energy. The most energetic encounters
occur around the boundary between the direct merging and the fly-by orbits, and
can emit several percent of initial total ADM energy at the peak. When the
total mass is fixed, energy and angular momentum radiated in the case of
unequal mass black holes are smaller than those of equal mass black holes
having the same initial orbital angular momentum for the fly-by orbits. We have
compared our results with two different Post-Newtonian (PN) approximations, the
exact parabolic orbit (EPO) and PN corrected orbit (PNCO). We find that the
agreement between the EPO and the numerical relativity breaks down for very
close encounters ($\it{e.g.}$, $b_{\rm crit} \lesssim 100$ M), and it becomes
worse for higher mass ratios. For instance, the critical impact parameters can
differ by more than $50\%$ from those obtained in EPO if the relative velocity
at infinity $v_{\infty}$ is larger than 0.1 for the mass ratio of
$m_{1}/m_{2}=16$. The PNCO gives more consistent results than EPO, but it also
underestimates the critical impact parameter for the GR capture at $b_{\rm
crit} \lesssim40$ M.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01568 [pdf] - 1576426
Black Hole Binaries Dynamically Formed in Globular Clusters
Submitted: 2017-03-05, last modified: 2017-05-10
We investigate properties of black hole (BH) binaries formed in globular
clusters via dynamical processes, using direct N-body simulations. We pay
attention to effects of BH mass function on the total mass and mass ratio
distributions of BH binaries ejected from clusters. Firstly, we consider BH
populations with two different masses in order to learn basic differences from
models with single-mass BHs only. Secondly, we consider continuous BH mass
functions adapted from recent studies on massive star evolution in a low
metallicity environment, where globular clusters are formed. In this work, we
consider only binaries that are formed by three-body processes and ignore
stellar evolution and primordial binaries for simplicity. Our results imply
that most BH binary mergers take place after they get ejected from the cluster.
Also, mass ratios of dynamically formed binaries should be close to one or
likely to be less than 2:1. Since the binary formation efficiency is larger for
higher-mass BHs, it is likely that a BH mass function sampled by
gravitational-wave observations would be weighed toward higher masses than the
mass function of single BHs for a dynamically formed population. Applying
conservative assumptions regarding globular cluster populations such as small
BH mass fraction and no primordial binaries, the merger rate of BH binaries
originated from globular clusters is estimated to be at least 6.5 per yr per
Gpc^3. Actual rate can be up to more than several times of our conservative
estimate.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.1641 [pdf] - 1173257
Compact Binaries Ejected from Globular Clusters as GW Sources
Submitted: 2013-08-07, last modified: 2014-02-25
Performing N-body simulations, we examine the dynamics of BH-BH (10 Msun
each) and NS-NS (1.4 Msun each) binaries formed in a cluster and its
implications for gravitational wave detection. A significant fraction of
compact binaries are ejected from a globular cluster after core collapse. Among
the total number of ejected compact objects, 30 per cent of them are in
binaries. Merging time-scales of ejected binaries, which depend on the
cluster's velocity dispersion, are in some cases shorter than the age of the
universe. During the merging event, these dynamically formed compact mergers
are expected to produce gravitational waves that can be detectable by the
advanced ground-based interferometers. Based on our reference assumptions,
merger rates of ejected BH-BH and NS-NS binaries per globular cluster are
estimated to be 2.5 and 0.27 per Gyr, respectively. Assuming the spatial
density of globular clusters to be 8.4 h^3 clusters Mpc^-3 and extrapolating
the merger rate estimates to the horizon distance of the advanced LIGO-Virgo
network, we expect the detection rates for BH-BH and NS-NS binaries with
cluster origin are to be 15 and 0.024 yr^-1, respectively. We find out that
some of the dynamically formed binaries are ejected with a large escape
velocity. They can be responsible for short gamma-ray bursts whose locations
are far from host galaxies.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.5123 [pdf] - 1032799
The Herschel-SPIRE instrument and its in-flight performance
Griffin, M. J.;
Abergel, A.;
Abreu, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
André, P.;
Augueres, J. -L.;
Babbedge, T.;
Bae, Y.;
Baillie, T.;
Baluteau, J. -P.;
Barlow, M. J.;
Bendo, G.;
Benielli, D.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonhomme, P.;
Brisbin, D.;
Brockley-Blatt, C.;
Caldwell, M.;
Cara, C.;
Castro-Rodriguez, N.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chanial, P.;
Chen, S.;
Clark, E.;
Clements, D. L.;
Clerc, L.;
Coker, J.;
Communal, D.;
Conversi, L.;
Cox, P.;
Crumb, D.;
Cunningham, C.;
Daly, F.;
Davis, G. R.;
De Antoni, P.;
Delderfield, J.;
Devin, N.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Didschuns, I.;
Dohlen, K.;
Donati, M.;
Dowell, A.;
Dowell, C. D.;
Duband, L.;
Dumaye, L.;
Emery, R. J.;
Ferlet, M.;
Ferrand, D.;
Fontignie, J.;
Fox, M.;
Franceschini, A.;
Frerking, M.;
Fulton, T.;
Garcia, J.;
Gastaud, R.;
Gear, W. K.;
Glenn, J.;
Goizel, A.;
Griffin, D. K.;
Grundy, T.;
Guest, S.;
Guillemet, L.;
Hargrave, P. C.;
Harwit, M.;
Hastings, P.;
Hatziminaoglou, E.;
Herman, M.;
Hinde, B.;
Hristov, V.;
Huang, M.;
Imhof, P.;
Isaak, K. J.;
Israelsson, U.;
Ivison, R. J.;
Jennings, D.;
Kiernan, B.;
King, K. J.;
Lange, A. E.;
Latter, W.;
Laurent, G.;
Laurent, P.;
Leeks, S. J.;
Lellouch, E.;
Levenson, L.;
Li, B.;
Li, J.;
Lilienthal, J.;
Lim, T.;
Liu, J.;
Lu, N.;
Madden, S.;
Mainetti, G.;
Marliani, P.;
McKay, D.;
Mercier, K.;
Molinari, S.;
Morris, H.;
Moseley, H.;
Mulder, J.;
Mur, M.;
Naylor, D. A.;
Nguyen, H.;
O'Halloran, B.;
Oliver, S.;
Olofsson, G.;
Olofsson, H. -G.;
Orfei, R.;
Page, M. J.;
Pain, I.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Papageorgiou, A.;
Parks, G.;
Parr-Burman, P.;
Pearce, A.;
Pearson, C.;
Pérez-Fournon, I.;
Pinsard, F.;
Pisano, G.;
Podosek, J.;
Pohlen, M.;
Polehampton, E. T.;
Pouliquen, D.;
Rigopoulou, D.;
Rizzo, D.;
Roseboom, I. G.;
Roussel, H.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rownd, B.;
Saraceno, P.;
Sauvage, M.;
Savage, R.;
Savini, G.;
Sawyer, E.;
Scharmberg, C.;
Schmitt, D.;
Schneider, N.;
Schulz, B.;
Schwartz, A.;
Shafer, R.;
Shupe, D. L.;
Sibthorpe, B.;
Sidher, S.;
Smith, A.;
Smith, A. J.;
Smith, D.;
Spencer, L.;
Stobie, B.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sukhatme, K.;
Surace, C.;
Stevens, J. A.;
Swinyard, B. M.;
Trichas, M.;
Tourette, T.;
Triou, H.;
Tseng, S.;
Tucker, C.;
Turner, A.;
Vaccari, M.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Vigroux, L.;
Virique, E.;
Voellmer, G.;
Walker, H.;
Ward, R.;
Waskett, T.;
Weilert, M.;
Wesson, R.;
White, G. J.;
Whitehouse, N.;
Wilson, C. D.;
Winter, B.;
Woodcraft, A. L.;
Wright, G. S.;
Xu, C. K.;
Zavagno, A.;
Zemcov, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zonca, E.
Submitted: 2010-05-27
The Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE), is the Herschel Space
Observatory`s submillimetre camera and spectrometer. It contains a three-band
imaging photometer operating at 250, 350 and 500 microns, and an imaging
Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) which covers simultaneously its whole
operating range of 194-671 microns (447-1550 GHz). The SPIRE detectors are
arrays of feedhorn-coupled bolometers cooled to 0.3 K. The photometer has a
field of view of 4' x 8', observed simultaneously in the three spectral bands.
Its main operating mode is scan-mapping, whereby the field of view is scanned
across the sky to achieve full spatial sampling and to cover large areas if
desired. The spectrometer has an approximately circular field of view with a
diameter of 2.6'. The spectral resolution can be adjusted between 1.2 and 25
GHz by changing the stroke length of the FTS scan mirror. Its main operating
mode involves a fixed telescope pointing with multiple scans of the FTS mirror
to acquire spectral data. For extended source measurements, multiple position
offsets are implemented by means of an internal beam steering mirror to achieve
the desired spatial sampling and by rastering of the telescope pointing to map
areas larger than the field of view. The SPIRE instrument consists of a cold
focal plane unit located inside the Herschel cryostat and warm electronics
units, located on the spacecraft Service Module, for instrument control and
data handling. Science data are transmitted to Earth with no on-board data
compression, and processed by automatic pipelines to produce calibrated science
products. The in-flight performance of the instrument matches or exceeds
predictions based on pre-launch testing and modelling: the photometer
sensitivity is comparable to or slightly better than estimated pre-launch, and
the spectrometer sensitivity is also better by a factor of 1.5-2.