Normalized to: Badruddin.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.07917 [pdf] - 1268648
Study of Cosmic-Ray Modulation during the Recent Unusual Minimum and
Mini Maximum of Solar Cycle 24
Submitted: 2015-07-27
After a prolonged and deep solar minimum at the end of Cycle 23, the current
Solar Cycle 24 is one of the lowest cycles. These two periods of deep minimum
and mini maximum are separated by a period of increasing solar activity. We
study the cosmic-ray intensity variation in relation with the solar activity,
heliospheric plasma and field parameters, including the heliospheric current
sheet, during these three periods (phases) of different activity level and
nature: (a) a deep minimum, (b) an increasing activity period and (c) a mini
maximum. We use neutron monitor data from stations located around the globe to
study the rigidity dependence on modulation during the two extremes, i.e.,
minimum and maximum. We also study the time lag between the cosmic-ray
intensity and various solar and interplanetary parameters separately during the
three activity phases. We also analyze the role of various parameters,
including the current sheet tilt, in modulating the cosmic-ray intensity during
the three different phases. Their relative importance and the implications of
our results are also discussed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.1041 [pdf] - 904576
Influence of cosmic-ray variability on the monsoon rainfall and
temperature
Submitted: 2014-11-23
We study the role of galactic cosmic ray (GCR) variability in influencing the
rainfall variability in Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall (ISMR) season. We find
that on an average during 'drought' (low ISMR) periods in India, GCR flux is
decreasing, and during 'flood' (high ISMR) periods, GCR flux is increasing. The
results of our analysis suggest for a possibility that the decreasing GCR flux
during the summer monsoon season in India may suppress the rainfall. On the
other hand, increasing GCR flux may enhance the rainfall. We suspect that in
addition to real environmental conditions, significant levitation/dispersion of
low clouds and hence reduced possibility of collision/coalescence to form
raindrops suppresses the rainfall during decreasing GCR flux in monsoon season.
On the other hand, enhanced collision/coalescence efficiency during increasing
GCR flux due to electrical effects may contribute to enhancing the rainfall.
Based on the observations, we put forward the idea that, under suitable
environmental conditions, changing GCR flux may influence precipitation by
suppressing/enhancing it, depending upon the decreasing/increasing nature of
GCR flux variability during monsoon season in India, at least. We further note
that the rainfall variability is inversely related to the temperature variation
during ISMR season. We suggest an explanation, although speculative, how a
decreasing/increasing GCR flux can influence the rainfall and the temperature.
We speculate that the proposed hypothesis, based on the Indian climate data can
be extended to whole tropical and sub-tropical belt, and that it may contribute
to global temperature in a significant way. If correct, our hypothesis has
important implication for the sun - climate link.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.1805 [pdf] - 863066
Study of the influence of solar variability on a regional (Indian)
climate: 1901-2007
Submitted: 2014-07-04
We use Indian temperature data of more than 100 years to study the influence
of solar activity on climate. We study the Sun-climate relationship by
averaging solar and climate data at various time scales; decadal, solar
activity and solar magnetic cycles. We also consider the minimum and maximum
values of sunspot number (SSN) during each solar cycle. This parameter SSN is
correlated better with Indian temperature when these data are averaged over
solar magnetic polarity epochs (SSN maximum to maximum). Our results indicate
that the solar variability may still be contributing to ongoing climate change
and suggest for more investigations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.2003 [pdf] - 806310
Fluctuations in the interplanetary electric potential and energy
coupling between the solar-wind and the magnetosphere
Submitted: 2013-12-06
We utilize solar rotation average geomagnetic index ap and various solar wind
plasma and field parameters for four solar cycles 20-23. We perform analysis to
search for a best possible coupling function at 27-day time resolution.
Regression analysis using these data at different phases of solar activity
(increasing including maximum/decreasing including minimum) led us to suggest
that the time variation of interplanetary electric potential is a better
coupling function for solar wind-magnetosphere coupling. We suspect that a
faster rate of change in interplanetary electric potential at the magnetopause
might enhance the reconnection rate and energy transfer from the solar wind
into the magnetosphere. The possible mechanism that involves the interplanetary
potential fluctuations in influencing the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling is
being investigated.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.2002 [pdf] - 806309
Similarities and Distinctions in Cosmic-Ray Modulation during Different
Phases of Solar and Magnetic Activity Cycles
Submitted: 2013-12-06
We study the solar-activity and solar-polarity dependence of galactic
cosmic-ray intensity (CRI) on the solar and heliospheric parameters playing a
significant role in solar modulation. We utilize the data for cosmic-ray
intensity as measured by neutron monitors, solar activity as measured by
sunspot number (SSN), interplanetary plasma/field parameters, solar-wind
velocity [V] and magnetic field [B], as well as the tilt of the heliospheric
current sheet [{\Lambda}] and analyse these data for Solar Cycles 20 - 24 (1965
- 2011). We divide individual Solar Cycles into four phases, i.e. low, high,
increasing, and decreasing solar activity. We perform regression analysis to
calculate and compare the CRI-response to changes in different
solar/interplanetary parameters during (i) different phases of solar activity
and (ii) similar activity phases but different polarity states. We find that
the CRI-response is different during negative (A<0) as compared to positive
(A>0) polarity states not only with SSN and {\Lambda} but also with B and V.
The relative CRI-response to changes in various parameters, in negative (A<0)
as compared to positive (A>0) state, is solar-activity dependent; it is ~2 to 3
times higher in low solar activity, ~1.5 to 2 times higher in moderate
(increasing/decreasing) activity, and it is nearly equal in high solar-activity
conditions. Although our results can be ascribed to preferential entry of
charged particles via the equatorial/polar regions of the heliosphere as
predicted by drift models, these results also suggest that we should look for,
any polarity-dependent response of solar wind and transport parameters in
modulating CRI in the heliosphere.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.1865 [pdf] - 756166
Study of the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling on different time scales
Submitted: 2013-12-05
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, its causes and consequences have been
studied for the last several decades. However, the assessment of continuously
changing behaviour of the sun, plasma and field flows in the interplanetary
space and their influence on geomagnetic activity is still a subject of intense
research. Search for the best possible coupling function is also important for
space weather prediction. We utilize four geomagnetic indices (ap, aa, AE and
Dst) as parameters of geomagnetic activity level in the earth's magnetosphere.
In addition to these indices, we utilize various solar wind plasma and field
parameters for the corresponding periods. We analyse the geomagnetic activity
and plasma/field parameters at yearly, half-yearly, 27-day, daily, 3-hourly,
and hourly time resolutions. Regression analysis using geomagnetic and solar
wind data of different time resolutions, over a continuous long period, and at
different phases of solar activity (increasing including maximum/decreasing
including minimum) led us to suggest that two parameters BV/1000 (mV/m) and BV2
(mV/s) are highly correlated with the all four geomagnetic activity indices not
only at any particular time scale but at different time scales. It probably
suggests for some role of the fluctuations/variations in interplanetary
electric potential, its spacial variation [i.e., interplanetary electric field
BV (mV/m)] and/or time variation [BV2 (mV/s)], in influencing the reconnection
rate.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.7387 [pdf] - 753498
Solar Modulation of Cosmic Rays during the Declining and Minimum Phases
of Solar Cycle 23: Comparison with Past Three Solar Cycles
Submitted: 2013-11-28
We study solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) during the deep
solar minimum, including the declining phase, of solar cycle 23 and compare the
results of this unusual period with the results obtained during similar phases
of the previous solar cycles 20, 21, and 22. These periods consist of two
epochs each of negative and positive polarities of the heliospheric magnetic
field from the north polar region of the Sun. In addition to cosmic ray data,
we utilize simultaneous solar and interplanetary plasma/field data including
the tilt angle of the heliospheric current sheet. We study the relation between
simultaneous variations in cosmic ray intensity and solar/interplanetary
parameters during the declining and the minimum phases of cycle 23. We compare
these relations with those obtained for the same phases in the three previous
solar cycles. We observe certain peculiar features in cosmic ray modulation
during the minimum of solar cycle 23 including the record high GCR intensity.
We find, during this unusual minimum, that the correlation of GCR intensity is
poor with sunspot number (R = -0.41), better with interplanetary magnetic field
(R = -0.66), still better with solar wind velocity (R = -0.80) and much better
with the tilt angle of the heliospheric current sheet (R = -0.92). In our view,
it is not the diffusion or the drift alone, but the solar wind convection is
the most likely additional effect responsible for the record high GCR intensity
observed during the deep minimum of solar cycle 23.