Normalized to: Babel, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0804.0711 [pdf] - 11495
The evolution of Ap stars
Submitted: 2008-04-04
The many peculiarities of Ap stars (not only chemical ones, but also magnetic
field and slow rotation) may vary during the main-sequence evolution of these
stars. We review here briefly the evidences found in the last thirty years for
such evolution, with an emphasis on the more recent research. The position in
the HR diagram of low mass Ap stars with a significant surface magnetic field
(as measured by us) is reviewed as well.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208082 [pdf] - 50898
Multiplicity among chemically peculiar stars II. Cool magnetic Ap stars
Submitted: 2002-08-05
We present new orbits for sixteen Ap spectroscopic binaries, four of which
might in fact be Am stars, and give their orbital elements. Four of them are
SB2 systems: HD 5550, HD 22128, HD 56495 and HD 98088. The twelve other stars
are : HD 9996, HD 12288, HD 40711, HD 54908, HD 65339, HD 73709, HD 105680, HD
138426, HD 184471, HD 188854, HD 200405 and HD 216533. Rough estimates of the
individual masses of the components of HD 65339 (53 Cam) are given, combining
our radial velocities with the results of speckle interferometry and with
Hipparcos parallaxes. Considering the mass functions of 74 spectroscopic
binaries from this work and from the literature, we conclude that the
distribution of the mass ratio is the same for cool Ap stars as for normal G
dwarfs. Therefore, the only differences between binaries with normal stars and
those hosting an Ap star lie in the period distribution: except for the case of
HD 200405, all orbital periods are longer than (or equal to) 3 days. A
consequence of this peculiar distribution is a deficit of null eccentricities.
There is no indication that the secondary has a special nature, like e.g. a
white dwarf.