Normalized to: Arnold, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.10260 [pdf] - 2101573
The velocity structure of Cygnus OB2
Submitted: 2020-05-20
The kinematic structure of the Cygnus OB2 association is investigated. No
evidence of expansion or contraction is found at any scale within the region.
Stars that are within $\sim$ 0.5 parsecs of one another are found to have more
similar velocities than would be expected by random chance, and so it is
concluded that velocity substructure exists on these scales. At larger scales
velocity substructure is not found. We suggest that bound substructures exist
on scales of $\sim$ 0.5 parsecs, despite the region as a whole being unbound.
We further suggest that any velocity substructure that existed on scales > 0.5
parsecs has been erased. The results of this study are then compared to those
of other kinematic studies of Cygnus OB2.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.10317 [pdf] - 1898090
Dynamical evolution of star-forming regions: III. Unbound stars and
predictions for Gaia
Submitted: 2019-05-24
We use $N$-body simulations to probe the early phases of the dynamical
evolution of star-forming regions and focus on mass and velocity distributions
of unbound stars. In this parameter space study, we vary the initial virial
ratio and degree of spatial and kinematic substructure and analyse the fraction
of stars that become unbound in two different mass classes (above and below 8
M$_{\odot}$). We find that the fraction of unbound stars differs depending on
the initial conditions. After 10 Myr, in initially highly subvirial,
substructured simulations, the high-mass and lower-mass unbound fractions are
similar at $\sim$23 per cent. In initially virialised, substructured
simulations, we find only $\sim$16 per cent of all high-mass stars are unbound,
whereas $\sim$37 per cent of all lower-mass stars are. The velocity
distributions of unbound stars only show differences for extremely different
initial conditions. The distributions are dominated by large numbers of
lower-mass stars becoming unbound just above the escape velocity of $\sim$3 km
s$^{-1}$ with unbound high-mass stars moving faster on average than lower-mass
unbound stars. We see no high-mass runaway stars (velocity > 30 km s$^{-1}$)
from any of our initial conditions and only an occasional lower-mass runaway
star from initially subvirial/substructured simulations. In our simulations, we
find a small number of lower-mass walkaway stars (with velocity 5-30 km
s$^{-1}$) from all of our initial conditions. These walkaway stars should be
observable around many nearby star-forming regions with Gaia.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.05628 [pdf] - 1806280
A method to analyse velocity structure
Submitted: 2018-12-13
We present a new method of analysing and quantifying velocity structure in
star forming regions suitable for the rapidly increasing quantity and quality
of stellar position-velocity data. The method can be applied to data in any
number of dimensions, does not require the centre or characteristic size (e.g.
radius) of the region to be determined, and can be applied to regions with any
underlying density and velocity structure. We test the method on a variety of
example datasets and show it is robust with realistic observational
uncertainties and selection effects. This method identifies velocity
structures/scales in a region, and allows a direct comparison to be made
between regions.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.02990 [pdf] - 1585749
How do binary clusters form?
Submitted: 2017-07-10
Approximately 10 per cent of star clusters are found in pairs, known as
binary clusters. We propose a mechanism for binary cluster formation; we use
N-body simulations to show that velocity substructure in a single (even fairly
smooth) region can cause binary clusters to form. This process is highly
stochastic and it is not obvious from a region's initial conditions whether a
binary will form and, if it does, which stars will end up in which cluster. We
find the probability that a region will divide is mainly determined by its
virial ratio, and a virial ratio above 'equilibrium' is generally necessary for
binary formation. We also find that the mass ratio of the two clusters is
strongly influenced by the initial degree of spatial substructure in the
region.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.0941 [pdf] - 542628
Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST): A
Technology Roadmap for the Next Decade
Postman, Marc;
Argabright, Vic;
Arnold, Bill;
Aronstein, David;
Atcheson, Paul;
Blouke, Morley;
Brown, Tom;
Calzetti, Daniela;
Cash, Webster;
Clampin, Mark;
Content, Dave;
Dailey, Dean;
Danner, Rolf;
Doxsey, Rodger;
Ebbets, Dennis;
Eisenhardt, Peter;
Feinberg, Lee;
Fruchter, Andrew;
Giavalisco, Mauro;
Glassman, Tiffany;
Gong, Qian;
Green, James;
Grunsfeld, John;
Gull, Ted;
Hickey, Greg;
Hopkins, Randall;
Hraba, John;
Hyde, Tupper;
Jordan, Ian;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Kendrick, Steve;
Kilston, Steve;
Koekemoer, Anton;
Korechoff, Bob;
Krist, John;
Mather, John;
Lillie, Chuck;
Lo, Amy;
Lyon, Rick;
McCullough, Peter;
Mosier, Gary;
Mountain, Matt;
Oegerle, Bill;
Pasquale, Bert;
Purves, Lloyd;
Penera, Cecelia;
Polidan, Ron;
Redding, Dave;
Sahu, Kailash;
Saif, Babak;
Sembach, Ken;
Shull, Mike;
Smith, Scott;
Sonneborn, George;
Spergel, David;
Stahl, Phil;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Thronson, Harley;
Thronton, Gary;
Townsend, Jackie;
Traub, Wesley;
Unwin, Steve;
Valenti, Jeff;
Vanderbei, Robert;
Werner, Michael;
Wesenberg, Richard;
Wiseman, Jennifer;
Woodgate, Bruce
Submitted: 2009-04-06, last modified: 2009-05-08
The Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST) is a set of
mission concepts for the next generation of UVOIR space observatory with a
primary aperture diameter in the 8-m to 16-m range that will allow us to
perform some of the most challenging observations to answer some of our most
compelling questions, including "Is there life elsewhere in the Galaxy?" We
have identified two different telescope architectures, but with similar optical
designs, that span the range in viable technologies. The architectures are a
telescope with a monolithic primary mirror and two variations of a telescope
with a large segmented primary mirror. This approach provides us with several
pathways to realizing the mission, which will be narrowed to one as our
technology development progresses. The concepts invoke heritage from HST and
JWST design, but also take significant departures from these designs to
minimize complexity, mass, or both.
Our report provides details on the mission concepts, shows the extraordinary
scientific progress they would enable, and describes the most important
technology development items. These are the mirrors, the detectors, and the
high-contrast imaging technologies, whether internal to the observatory, or
using an external occulter. Experience with JWST has shown that determined
competitors, motivated by the development contracts and flight opportunities of
the new observatory, are capable of achieving huge advances in technical and
operational performance while keeping construction costs on the same scale as
prior great observatories.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.1851 [pdf] - 18445
Dynamics of substructures in warm dark-matter cosmologies
Submitted: 2008-11-12, last modified: 2008-11-13
We performed cosmological simulations based upon both a cold dark matter
(CDM) and a warm dark matter (WDM) model. The focus of our investigations lies
with selected spatial and kinematic properties of substructure halos (subhalos)
orbiting within host halos, that form in both dark-matter cosmologies. We aim
at using the dynamics of the subhalos as a probe of the respective cosmology.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.1628 [pdf] - 9977
The Dynamics of Subhalos in Warm Dark Matter Models
Submitted: 2008-02-12
We present a comparison of the properties of substructure halos (subhalos)
orbiting within host halos that form in Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and Warm Dark
Matter (WDM) cosmologies. Our study focuses on selected properties of these
subhalos, namely their anisotropic spatial distribution within the hosts; the
existence of a "backsplash'' population; the age-distance relation; the degree
to which they suffer mass loss; and the distribution of relative (infall)
velocities with respect to the hosts. We find that the number density of
subhalos in our WDM model is suppressed relative to that in the CDM model, as
we would expect. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that backsplash subhalos
exist in both the WDM and CDM models. Indeed, there are no statistically
significant differences between the spatial distributions of subhalos in the
CDM and WDM models. There is evidence that subhalos in the WDM model suffer
enhanced mass loss relative to their counterparts in the CDM model, reflecting
their lower central densities. We note also a tendency for the (infall)
velocities of subhalos in the WDM model to be higher than in the CDM model.
Nevertheless, we conclude that observational tests based on either the spatial
distribution or the kinematics of the subhalo population are unlikely to help
us to differentiate between the CDM model and our adopted WDM model.