Normalized to: Arjona, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.01529 [pdf] - 2119834
What can Machine Learning tell us about the background expansion of the
Universe?
Submitted: 2019-10-03, last modified: 2020-06-23
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have revolutionized the way we interpret
data in astronomy, particle physics, biology and even economics, since they can
remove biases due to a priori chosen models. Here we apply a particular ML
method, the genetic algorithms (GA), to cosmological data that describes the
background expansion of the Universe, namely the Pantheon Type Ia supernovae
and the Hubble expansion history $H(z)$ datasets. We obtain model independent
and nonparametric reconstructions of the luminosity distance $d_L(z)$ and
Hubble parameter $H(z)$ without assuming any dark energy model or a flat
Universe. We then estimate the deceleration parameter $q(z)$, a measure of the
acceleration of the Universe, and we make a $\sim4.5\sigma$ model independent
detection of the accelerated expansion, but we also place constraints on the
transition redshift of the acceleration phase
$(z_{\textrm{tr}}=0.662\pm0.027)$. We also find a deviation from $\Lambda$CDM
at high redshifts, albeit within the errors, hinting toward the recently
alleged tension between the SnIa/quasar data and the cosmological constant
$\Lambda$CDM model at high redshifts $(z\gtrsim1.5)$. Finally, we show the GA
can be used in complementary null tests of the $\Lambda$CDM via reconstructions
of the Hubble parameter and the luminosity distance.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.01762 [pdf] - 2105877
Cosmological constraints on non-adiabatic dark energy perturbations
Submitted: 2020-06-02
The exact nature of dark energy is currently unknown and its cosmological
perturbations, when dark energy is assumed not to be the cosmological constant,
are usually modelled as adiabatic. Here we explore the possibility that dark
energy might have a non-adiabatic component and we examine how it would affect
several key cosmological observables. We present analytical solutions for the
growth-rate and growth index of matter density perturbations and compare them
to both numerical solutions of the fluid equations and an implementation in the
Boltzmann code CLASS, finding they all agree to well below one percent. We also
perform a Monte-Carlo analysis to derive constraints on the parameters of the
non-adiabatic component using the latest cosmological data, including the
temperature and polarization spectra of the Cosmic Microwave Background as
observed by Planck, the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, the Pantheon type Ia
supernovae compilation and lastly, measurements of Redshift Space Distortions
(RSD) of the growth-rate of matter perturbations. We find that the amplitude of
the non-adiabatic pressure perturbation is consistent with zero within
$1\sigma$. Finally, we also present a new, publicly available, RSD likelihood
for MontePython based on the "Gold 2018" growth-rate data compilation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.12700 [pdf] - 2056396
Machine Learning meets the redshift evolution of the CMB Temperature
Submitted: 2020-02-28
We present a model independent and non-parametric reconstruction with a
Machine Learning algorithm of the redshift evolution of the Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB) temperature from a wide redshift range $z\in \left[0,3\right]$
without assuming any dark energy model, an adiabatic universe or photon number
conservation. In particular we use the genetic algorithms which avoid the
dependency on an initial prior or a cosmological fiducial model. Through our
reconstruction we constrain new physics at late times. We provide novel and
updated estimates on the $\beta$ parameter from the parametrisation
$\text{T}(z)=\text{T}_0(1+z)^{1-\beta}$, the duality relation $\eta(z)$ and the
cosmic opacity parameter $\tau(z)$. Furthermore we place constraints on a
spatial varying fine structure constant $\alpha$, which would have signatures
in a broad spectrum of physical phenomena such as the CMB anisotropies. Overall
we find no evidence of deviations within the $1\sigma$ region from the well
established $\Lambda\text{CDM}$ model, thus confirming its predictive
potential.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.11420 [pdf] - 2048595
Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning
Submitted: 2020-01-30, last modified: 2020-02-14
Recent analyses of the Planck data and quasars at high redshifts have
suggested possible deviations from the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter model
($\Lambda$CDM), where $\Lambda$ is the cosmological constant. Here, we use
machine learning methods to investigate any possible deviations from
$\Lambda$CDM at both low and high redshifts by using the latest cosmological
data. Specifically, we apply the genetic algorithms to explore the nature of
dark energy (DE) in a model independent fashion by reconstructing its equation
of state $w(z)$, the growth index of matter density perturbations $\gamma(z)$,
the linear DE anisotropic stress $\eta_{DE}(z)$ and the adiabatic sound speed
$c_{s,DE}^2(z)$ of DE perturbations. We find a $\sim2\sigma$ deviation of
$w(z)$ from -1 at high redshifts, the adiabatic sound speed is negative at the
$\sim2\sigma$ level and a $\sim3.5\sigma$ deviation of the anisotropic stress
from unity at low redshifts and $\sim5.5 \sigma$ at high redshifts. These
results suggest either the presence of a strong non-adiabatic component in the
DE sound speed or the presence of DE anisotropic stress, thus hinting at
possible deviations from the $\Lambda$CDM model.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.03160 [pdf] - 1987399
Analytic expressions for the background evolution of massive neutrinos
and dark matter particles
Submitted: 2019-06-07, last modified: 2019-10-29
We provide exact analytic expressions for the density, pressure, average
number density and pseudo-pressure for massive neutrinos and generic dark
matter particles, both fermions and bosons. We then focus on massive neutrinos
and we compare our analytic expressions with the numerical implementation in
the CLASS Boltzmann code. We find that our modifications including the exact
analytic expressions are in agreement to better than $10^{-4}\%$ with the
default CLASS implementation in the estimation of the CMB power spectrum; our
modifications do not have an impact on the performance of the code. We also
provide several specific limits of our expressions at the relativistic regime,
but also at late times for the neutrino equation of state.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.06294 [pdf] - 1966707
Designing Horndeski and the effective fluid approach
Submitted: 2019-04-12, last modified: 2019-09-23
We present a family of designer Horndeski models, i.e. models that have a
background exactly equal to that of the $\Lambda$CDM model but perturbations
given by the Horndeski theory. Then, we extend the effective fluid approach to
Horndeski theories, providing simple analytic formulae for the equivalent dark
energy effective fluid pressure, density and velocity. We implement the dark
energy effective fluid formulae in our code EFCLASS, a modified version of the
widely used Boltzmann solver CLASS, and compare the solution of the
perturbation equations with those of the code hi_CLASS which already includes
Horndeski models. We find that our simple modifications to the vanilla code are
accurate to the level of $\sim 0.1\%$ with respect to the more complicated
hi_CLASS code. Furthermore, we study the kinetic braiding model both on and off
the attractor and we find that even though the full case has a proper
$\Lambda$CDM model limit for large $n$, it is not appropriately smooth, thus
causing the quasistatic approximation to break down. Finally, we focus on our
designer model (HDES), which has both a smooth $\Lambda$CDM limit and
well-behaved perturbations, and we use it to perform Markov Chain Monte Carlo
analyses to constrain its parameters with the latest cosmological data. We find
that our HDES model can also alleviate the soft $2\sigma$ tension between the
growth data and Planck 18 due to a degeneracy between $\sigma_8$ and one of its
model parameters that indicates the deviation from the $\Lambda$CDM model.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.10130 [pdf] - 1922524
Lensing convergence and anisotropic dark energy in galaxy redshift
surveys
Submitted: 2019-07-23
Analyses of upcoming galaxy surveys will require careful modelling of
relevant observables such as the power spectrum of galaxy counts in harmonic
space $C_\ell(z,z')$. We investigate the impact of disregarding relevant
relativistic effects by considering a model of dark energy including constant
sound speed, constant equation of state $w_0$, and anisotropic stress. Here we
show that neglecting the effect of lensing convergence will lead to substantial
shifts in cosmological parameters such as the galaxy bias $b_0$, the value of
the dark energy equation of state today $w_0$, and the Hubble constant $H_0$.
Interestingly, neglecting the effect of lensing convergence in this kind of
models results in shifting $H_0$ downwards, something which could shed light on
the current tension between local and CMB determinations of the Hubble
constant.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02469 [pdf] - 1831780
Unraveling the effective fluid approach for $f(R)$ models in the
subhorizon approximation
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-02-13
We provide explicit formulas for the effective fluid approach of $f(R)$
theories, such as the Hu & Sawicki and the designer models. Using the latter
and simple modifications to the CLASS code, which we call EFCLASS, in
conjunction with very accurate analytic approximations for the background
evolution, we obtain competitive results in a much simpler and less error-prone
approach. We also derive the initial conditions in matter domination and we
find they differ from those already found in the literature for a constant $w$
model. A clear example is the designer model that behaves as $\Lambda$CDM in
the background, but has nonetheless dark energy perturbations. We then use the
aforementioned models to derive constraints from the latest cosmological data,
including supernovae, BAO, CMB, $H(z)$ and growth-rate data, and find they are
statistically consistent to the $\Lambda$CDM model. Finally, we show that the
viscosity parameter $c_{vis}^2$ in realistic models is not constant as commonly
assumed, but rather evolves significantly over several orders of magnitude,
something which could affect forecasts of upcoming surveys.