Normalized to: Argabright, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.02038 [pdf] - 1224352
Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler VI: Planet Sample from Q1-Q16
(47 Months)
Mullally, F.;
Coughlin, Jeffrey L.;
Thompson, Susan E.;
Rowe, Jason;
Burke, Christopher;
Latham, David W.;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Christiansen, Jessie;
Henze, Christopher E.;
Ofir, Aviv;
Quarles, Billy;
Shporer, Avi;
Van Eylen, Vincent;
Van Laerhoven, Christa;
Shah, Yash;
Wolfgang, Angie;
Chaplin, W. J.;
Xie, Ji-Wei;
Akeson, Rachel;
Argabright, Vic;
Bachtell, Eric;
Borucki, Thomas Barclay William J.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Campbell, Jennifer R.;
Catanzarite, Joseph H.;
Cochran, William D.;
Duren, Riley M.;
Fleming, Scott W.;
Fraquelli, Dorothy;
Girouard, Forrest R.;
Haas, Michael R.;
Hełminiak, Krzysztof G.;
Howell, Steve B.;
Huber, Daniel;
Larson, Kipp;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Jenkins, Jon;
Li, Jie;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
McArthur, Scot;
Miller, Chris;
Morris, Robert L.;
Patil-Sabale, Anima;
Plavchan, Peter;
Putnam, Dustin;
Quintana, Elisa V.;
Ramirez, Solange;
Aguirre, V. Silva;
Seader, Shawn;
Smith, Jeffrey C.;
Steffen, Jason H.;
Stewart, Chris;
Stober, Jeremy;
Still, Martin;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Troeltzsch, John;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Zamudio, Khadeejah A.
Submitted: 2015-02-06
\We present the sixth catalog of Kepler candidate planets based on nearly 4
years of high precision photometry. This catalog builds on the legacy of
previous catalogs released by the Kepler project and includes 1493 new Kepler
Objects of Interest (KOIs) of which 554 are planet candidates, and 131 of these
candidates have best fit radii <1.5 R_earth. This brings the total number of
KOIs and planet candidates to 7305 and 4173 respectively. We suspect that many
of these new candidates at the low signal-to-noise limit may be false alarms
created by instrumental noise, and discuss our efforts to identify such
objects. We re-evaluate all previously published KOIs with orbital periods of
>50 days to provide a consistently vetted sample that can be used to improve
planet occurrence rate calculations. We discuss the performance of our planet
detection algorithms, and the consistency of our vetting products. The full
catalog is publicly available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.5207 [pdf] - 1078224
Kepler Mission Stellar and Instrument Noise Properties
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Chaplin, William J.;
Dunham, Edward W.;
Argabright, Vic S.;
Borucki, William J.;
Basri, Gibor;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Buzasi, Derek L.;
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Elsworth, Yvonne P.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Koch, David G.;
Kolodziejczak, Jeffrey;
Miglio, Andrea;
van Cleve, Jeffrey;
Walkowicz, Lucianne M.;
Welsh, William F.
Submitted: 2011-07-26
Kepler Mission results are rapidly contributing to fundamentally new
discoveries in both the exoplanet and asteroseismology fields. The data
returned from Kepler are unique in terms of the number of stars observed,
precision of photometry for time series observations, and the temporal extent
of high duty cycle observations. As the first mission to provide extensive time
series measurements on thousands of stars over months to years at a level
hitherto possible only for the Sun, the results from Kepler will vastly
increase our knowledge of stellar variability for quiet solar-type stars. Here
we report on the stellar noise inferred on the timescale of a few hours of most
interest for detection of exoplanets via transits. By design the data from
moderately bright Kepler stars are expected to have roughly comparable levels
of noise intrinsic to the stars and arising from a combination of fundamental
limitations such as Poisson statistics and any instrument noise. The noise
levels attained by Kepler on-orbit exceed by some 50% the target levels for
solar-type, quiet stars. We provide a decomposition of observed noise for an
ensemble of 12th magnitude stars arising from fundamental terms (Poisson and
readout noise), added noise due to the instrument and that intrinsic to the
stars. The largest factor in the modestly higher than anticipated noise follows
from intrinsic stellar noise. We show that using stellar parameters from
galactic stellar synthesis models, and projections to stellar rotation,
activity and hence noise levels reproduces the primary intrinsic stellar noise
features.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0216 [pdf] - 1018950
Instrument Performance in Kepler's First Months
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Kolodziejczak, Jeffery J.;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey E.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Gazis, Paul R.;
Argabright, Vic S.;
Bachtell, Eric E.;
Dunham, Edward W.;
Geary, John C.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Chandrasekaran, Hema;
Li, Jie;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Wu, Hayley;
Borucki, William J.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Dotson, Jessie L.;
Haas, Michael R.;
Koch, David G.
Submitted: 2010-01-01
The Kepler Mission relies on precise differential photometry to detect the 80
parts per million (ppm) signal from an Earth-Sun equivalent transit. Such
precision requires superb instrument stability on time scales up to ~2 days and
systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the spacecraft and
photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets
taken to characterize the photometer performance. Because Kepler has no
shutter, we took a series of dark images prior to the dust cover ejection, from
which we measured the bias levels, dark current, and read noise. These basic
detector properties are essentially unchanged from ground-based tests,
indicating that the photometer is working as expected. Several image artifacts
have proven more complex than when observed during ground testing, as a result
of their interactions with starlight and the greater thermal stability in
flight, which causes the temperature-dependent artifact variations to be on the
timescales of transits. Because of Kepler's unprecedented sensitivity and
stability, we have also seen several unexpected systematics that affect
photometric precision. We are using the first 43 days of science data to
characterize these effects and to develop detection and mitigation methods that
will be implemented in the calibration pipeline. Based on early testing, we
expect to attain Kepler's planned photometric precision over 80%-90% of the
field of view.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.0941 [pdf] - 542628
Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST): A
Technology Roadmap for the Next Decade
Postman, Marc;
Argabright, Vic;
Arnold, Bill;
Aronstein, David;
Atcheson, Paul;
Blouke, Morley;
Brown, Tom;
Calzetti, Daniela;
Cash, Webster;
Clampin, Mark;
Content, Dave;
Dailey, Dean;
Danner, Rolf;
Doxsey, Rodger;
Ebbets, Dennis;
Eisenhardt, Peter;
Feinberg, Lee;
Fruchter, Andrew;
Giavalisco, Mauro;
Glassman, Tiffany;
Gong, Qian;
Green, James;
Grunsfeld, John;
Gull, Ted;
Hickey, Greg;
Hopkins, Randall;
Hraba, John;
Hyde, Tupper;
Jordan, Ian;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Kendrick, Steve;
Kilston, Steve;
Koekemoer, Anton;
Korechoff, Bob;
Krist, John;
Mather, John;
Lillie, Chuck;
Lo, Amy;
Lyon, Rick;
McCullough, Peter;
Mosier, Gary;
Mountain, Matt;
Oegerle, Bill;
Pasquale, Bert;
Purves, Lloyd;
Penera, Cecelia;
Polidan, Ron;
Redding, Dave;
Sahu, Kailash;
Saif, Babak;
Sembach, Ken;
Shull, Mike;
Smith, Scott;
Sonneborn, George;
Spergel, David;
Stahl, Phil;
Stapelfeldt, Karl;
Thronson, Harley;
Thronton, Gary;
Townsend, Jackie;
Traub, Wesley;
Unwin, Steve;
Valenti, Jeff;
Vanderbei, Robert;
Werner, Michael;
Wesenberg, Richard;
Wiseman, Jennifer;
Woodgate, Bruce
Submitted: 2009-04-06, last modified: 2009-05-08
The Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST) is a set of
mission concepts for the next generation of UVOIR space observatory with a
primary aperture diameter in the 8-m to 16-m range that will allow us to
perform some of the most challenging observations to answer some of our most
compelling questions, including "Is there life elsewhere in the Galaxy?" We
have identified two different telescope architectures, but with similar optical
designs, that span the range in viable technologies. The architectures are a
telescope with a monolithic primary mirror and two variations of a telescope
with a large segmented primary mirror. This approach provides us with several
pathways to realizing the mission, which will be narrowed to one as our
technology development progresses. The concepts invoke heritage from HST and
JWST design, but also take significant departures from these designs to
minimize complexity, mass, or both.
Our report provides details on the mission concepts, shows the extraordinary
scientific progress they would enable, and describes the most important
technology development items. These are the mirrors, the detectors, and the
high-contrast imaging technologies, whether internal to the observatory, or
using an external occulter. Experience with JWST has shown that determined
competitors, motivated by the development contracts and flight opportunities of
the new observatory, are capable of achieving huge advances in technical and
operational performance while keeping construction costs on the same scale as
prior great observatories.