Normalized to: Arendse, N.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.07986 [pdf] - 2129174
Cosmic dissonance: new physics or systematics behind a short sound
horizon?
Arendse, Nikki;
Wojtak, Radosław J.;
Agnello, Adriano;
Chen, Geoff C. -F.;
Fassnacht, Christopher D.;
Sluse, Dominique;
Hilbert, Stefan;
Millon, Martin;
Bonvin, Vivien;
Wong, Kenneth C.;
Courbin, Frédéric;
Suyu, Sherry H.;
Birrer, Simon;
Treu, Tommaso;
Koopmans, Leon V. E.
Submitted: 2019-09-17, last modified: 2020-05-13
Persistent tension between low-redshift observations and the Cosmic Microwave
Background radiation (CMB), in terms of two fundamental distance scales set by
the sound horizon $r_d$ and the Hubble constant $H_0$, suggests new physics
beyond the Standard Model or residual systematics. We examine recently updated
distance calibrations from Cepheids, gravitational lensing time-delay
observations, and the Tip of the Red Giant Branch. Calibrating the Baryon
Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Type Ia supernovae with combinations of the
distance indicators, we obtain a joint and self-consistent measurement of $H_0$
and $r_d$ at low redshift, independent of cosmological models and CMB
inference. In an attempt to alleviate the tension between late-time and
CMB-based measurements, we consider four extensions of the standard
$\Lambda$CDM model. The sound horizon from our different measurements is
$r_d=(137\pm3^{stat.}\pm2^{syst.})$~Mpc. Depending on the adopted distance
indicators, the $combined$ tension in $H_0$ and $r_d$ ranges between 2.3 and
5.1 $\sigma$. We find that modifications of $\Lambda$CDM that change the
physics after recombination fail to solve the problem, for the reason that they
only resolve the tension in $H_0$, while the tension in $r_d$ remains
unchanged. Pre-recombination extensions (with early dark energy or the
effective number of neutrinos $\rm{N}_{\rm{eff}}=3.24 \pm 0.16$) are allowed by
the data, unless the calibration from Cepheids is included. Results from
time-delay lenses are consistent with those from distance-ladder calibrations
and point to a discrepancy between absolute distance scales measured from the
CMB (assuming the standard cosmological model) and late-time observations. New
proposals to resolve this tension should be examined with respect to
reconciling not only the Hubble constant but also the sound horizon derived
from the CMB and other cosmological probes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12000 [pdf] - 2051593
Low-redshift measurement of the sound horizon through gravitational
time-delays
Submitted: 2019-05-28, last modified: 2020-02-19
The matter sound horizon can be inferred from the cosmic microwave background
within the Standard Model. Independent direct measurements of the sound horizon
are then a probe of possible deviations from the Standard Model. We aim at
measuring the sound horizon $r_s$ from low-redshift indicators, which are
completely independent of CMB inference. We used the measured product $H(z)r_s$
from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) together with supernovae~\textsc{I}a to
constrain $H(z)/H_{0}$ and time-delay lenses analysed by the H0LiCOW
collaboration to anchor cosmological distances ($\propto H_{0}^{-1}$).
{Additionally, we investigated the influence of adding a sample of quasars with
higher redshift with standardisable UV-Xray luminosity distances. We adopted
polynomial expansions in $H(z)$ or in comoving distances} so that our inference
was completely independent of any cosmological model on which the expansion
history might be based. Our measurements are independent of Cepheids and
systematics from peculiar motions {to within percent-level accuracy.} The
inferred sound horizon $r_s$ varies between $(133 \pm 8)$~Mpc and $(138 \pm
5)$~Mpc across different models. The discrepancy with CMB measurements is
robust against model choice. Statistical uncertainties are comparable to
systematics. The combination of time-delay lenses, supernovae, and BAO yields a
distance ladder that is independent of cosmology (and of Cepheid calibration)
and a measurement of $r_s $ that is independent of the CMB. These cosmographic
measurements are then a competitive test of the Standard Model, regardless of
the hypotheses on which the cosmology is based.