Normalized to: Arcila-Osejo, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.08464 [pdf] - 2072756
LARgE Survey -- III. Environments of Ultra-Massive Passive Galaxies at
Cosmic Noon: BCG progenitors growing through mergers
Submitted: 2020-03-18
We study the environments of a sample of 61 extremely rare z~1.6
Ultra-Massive Passively Evolving Galaxies (UMPEGs: stellar masses M_stars
>10^11.5 M_sun) which -- based on clustering analysis presented in Cheema et
al. (2020) -- appear to be associated with very massive (M_halo ~ 10^14.1 h^-1
M_sun) dark matter halos that are likely to be the progenitors of z~0 massive
(Coma- and Virgo-like) galaxy clusters. We find that UMPEGs on average have
fewer than one satellite galaxy with mass ratio M_sat : M_UMPEG >~ 1:5 (i.e.,
M_sat >~ 10^10.8 M_sun) within 0.5 Mpc; the large mass gap that we observe
between the typical UMPEG and its most massive satellite implies that the z~1.6
UMPEGs assembled through major mergers. Using observed satellite counts with
merger timescales from the literature, we estimate the growth rate due to
mergers with mass ratio of >~ 1:4 to be ~13% Gyr^-1 (with a ~2x systematic
uncertainty). This relatively low growth rate is unlikely to significantly
affect the shape of the massive end of the stellar mass function, whose
evolution must instead be driven by the quenching of new cohorts of
ultra-massive star-forming galaxies. However, this growth rate is high enough
that, if sustained to z~0, the typical z~1.6 M_UMPEG=10^11.6 M_sun UMPEG can
grow into a M_stars~10^12 M_sun brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) of a present-day
massive galaxy cluster. Our observations favour a scenario in which our UMPEGs
are main-branch progenitors of some of the present-day BCGs that have first
assembled through major mergers at high redshifts and grown further through
(likely minor) merging at later times.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.12891 [pdf] - 2056417
LARgE Survey -- II. The Dark Matter Halos and the Progenitors and
Descendants of Ultra-Massive Passive Galaxies at Cosmic Noon
Submitted: 2020-02-28
We use a 27.6 deg$^2$ survey to measure the clustering of $gzK_s$-selected
quiescent galaxies at $z\sim1.6$, focusing on ultra-massive quiescent galaxies.
We find that $z\sim1.6$ Ultra-Massive Passively Evolving Galaxies (UMPEGs),
which have $K_s(AB)<19.75$ (stellar masses of $M_{stars}$ $>\sim
10^{11.4}M_{\odot}$ and mean $<$$M_{stars}$$>$ = $10^{11.5}M_{\odot}$), cluster
more strongly than any other known galaxy population at high redshift.
Comparing their correlation length, $r_0 = 29.77 \pm 2.75$ $ h^{-1}$Mpc, with
the clustering of dark matter halos in the Millennium XXL N-body simulation
suggests that these $z\sim1.6$ UMPEGs reside in dark matter halos of mass
$M_{h}\sim10^{14.1}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. Such very massive $z\sim1.6$ halos are
associated with the ancestors of $z\sim0$ massive galaxy clusters such as the
Virgo and Coma clusters. Given their extreme stellar masses and lack of
companions with comparable mass, we surmise that these UMPEGs could be the
already-quenched central massive galaxies of their (proto)clusters. We conclude
that with only a modest amount of further growth in their stellar mass,
$z\sim1.6$ UMPEGs could be the progenitors of some of the massive central
galaxies of present-day massive galaxy clusters observed to be already very
massive and quiescent near the peak epoch of the cosmic star formation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.11654 [pdf] - 1878860
LARgE Survey. I. Dead Monsters: the Massive End of the Passive Galaxy
Stellar Mass Function at Cosmic Noon
Submitted: 2019-04-25
We introduce the largest to date survey of massive quiescent galaxies at
redshift z~1.6. With these data, which cover 27.6 deg^2, we can find
significant numbers of very rare objects such as ultra-massive quiescent
galaxies that populate the extreme massive end of the galaxy mass function, or
dense environments that are likely to become present-day massive galaxy
clusters. In this paper, the first in a series, we apply our gzK adaptation of
the BzK technique to select our z~1.6 galaxy catalog and then study the
quiescent galaxy stellar mass function with good statistics over M_stars ~
10^10.2 - 10^11.7 M_sun --- a factor of 30 in mass --- including 60
ultra-massive z~1.6 quiescent galaxies with M_stars > 10^11.5 M_sun. We find
that the stellar mass function of quiescent galaxies at z~1.6 is well
represented by the Schechter function over this large mass range. This suggests
that the mass quenching mechanism observed at lower redshifts must have already
been well established by this epoch, and that it is likely due to a single
physical mechanism over a wide range of mass. This close adherence to the
Schechter shape also suggests that neither merging nor gravitational lensing
significantly affect the observed quenched population. Finally, comparing
measurements of M* parameters for quiescent and star-forming populations (ours
and from the literature), we find hints of an offset (M*_SF > M*_PE), that
could suggest that the efficiency of the quenching process evolves with time.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.2319 [pdf] - 1215537
Angular clustering of z~2 star-forming and passive galaxies in 2.5
square degrees of deep CFHT imaging
Submitted: 2014-07-08
We study the angular clustering of z~2 galaxies using ~40,000 star-forming
(SF) and ~5,000 passively-evolving (PE) galaxies selected from ~2.5 deg$^2$ of
deep ($K_{lim}$=23-24 AB) CFHT imaging. For both populations the clustering is
stronger for galaxies brighter in rest-frame optical and the trend is
particularly strong for PE galaxies, indicating that passive galaxies with
larger stellar masses reside in more massive halos. In contrast, at rest-frame
UV we find that while the clustering of SF galaxies increases with increasing
luminosity, it decreases for PE galaxies; a possible explanation lies in
quenching of star formation in the most massive halos. Furthermore, we find two
components in the correlation functions for both SF and PE galaxies,
attributable to one- and two-halo terms. The presence of one-halo terms for
both PE and SF galaxies suggests that environmental effects were producing
passive galaxies in virtualized environments already by z~2. Finally, we find
notable clustering differences between the four widely-separated fields in our
study; the popular COSMOS field is the most discrepant (as is also the case for
number counts and luminosity functions), highlighting the need for very large
areas and multiple sightlines in galaxy evolution statistical studies.