Normalized to: Archana, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.00330 [pdf] - 1224274
Radio--Far infrared correlation in "blue cloud" galaxies with 0<z<1.2
Submitted: 2015-02-01
We study the radio--far infrared (FIR) correlation in "blue cloud" galaxies
chosen from the PRism MUltiobject Survey (PRIMUS) up to redshift ($z$) of 1.2
in the XMM-LSS field. We use rest-frame emission at 1.4 GHz in the radio and
both monochromatic (at 70$\mu$m) and bolometric (between $8-1000~\mu$m)
emission in the FIR. To probe the nature of the correlation up to $z\sim1.2$,
where direct detection of blue star-forming galaxies is impossible with current
technology, we employ the technique of image stacking at 0.325 and 1.4 GHz in
the radio and in six infrared bands, viz. 24, 70, 160, 250, 350 and $500~\mu$m.
For comparison, we also study the correlation for more luminous galaxies that
are directly detected. The stacking analysis allows us to probe the radio--FIR
correlation for galaxies that are up to 2 orders of magnitude fainter than the
ones detected directly. The $k-$correction in the infrared wavebands is
obtained by fitting the observed spectral energy distribution (SED) with a
composite mid-IR power law and a single temperature greybody model. We find
that the radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz ($L_{\rm 1.4GHz}$) is strongly correlated
with monochromatic FIR luminosity at 70 $\mu$m ($L_{\rm 70\mu m}$) having slope
$1.09\pm0.05$ and with bolometric luminosity ($L_{\rm TIR}$) having slope
$1.11\pm0.04$. The quantity $q_{\rm TIR} (=\log_{10}[L_{\rm TIR}/(3.75\times
10^{12} L_{\rm 1.4 GHz})])$ is observed to decrease with redshift as $q_{\rm
TIR} \propto (1+z)^{-0.16\pm0.03}$ probably caused due to the non-linear slope
of the radio--FIR correlation. Within the uncertainties of our measurement and
the limitations of our flux-limited and color-selected sample, we do not find
any evolution of the radio--FIR correlation with redshift.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1103.5514 [pdf] - 1053007
The Discovery and Nature of Optical Transient CSS100217:102913+404220
Drake, A. J.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Mahabal, A.;
Anderson, J.;
Roy, R.;
Mohan, V.;
Ravindranath, S.;
Frail, D.;
Gezari, S.;
Neill, James D.;
Ho, L. C.;
Prieto, J. L.;
Thompson, D.;
Thorstensen, J.;
Wagner, M.;
Kowalski, R.;
Chiang, J.;
Grove, J. E.;
Schinzel, F. K.;
Wood, D. L.;
Carrasco, L.;
Recillas, E.;
Kewley, L.;
Archana, K. N.;
Basu, Aritra;
Wadadekar, Yogesh;
Kumar, Brijesh;
Myers, A. D.;
Phinney, E. S.;
Williams, R.;
Graham, M. J.;
Catelan, M.;
Beshore, E.;
Larson, S.;
Christensen, E.
Submitted: 2011-03-28
We report on the discovery and observations of the extremely luminous optical
transient CSS100217:102913+404220 (CSS100217 hereafter). Spectroscopic
observations show this transient was coincident with a galaxy at redshift
z=0.147, and reached an apparent magnitude of V ~ 16.3. After correcting for
foreground Galactic extinction we determine the absolute magnitude to be M_V
=-22.7 approximately 45 days after maximum light. Based on our unfiltered
optical photometry the peak optical emission was L = 1.3 x 10^45 erg s^-1, and
over a period of 287 rest-frame days had an integrated bolometric luminosity of
1.2 x 10^52 erg. Analysis of the pre-outburst SDSS spectrum of the source shows
features consistent with a Narrow-line Seyfert1 (NLS1) galaxy. High-resolution
HST and Keck followup observations show the event occurred within 150pc of
nucleus of the galaxy, suggesting a possible link to the active nuclear region.
However, the rapid outburst along with photometric and spectroscopic evolution
are much more consistent with a luminous supernova. Line diagnostics suggest
that the host galaxy is undergoing significant star formation. We use extensive
follow-up of the event along with archival CSS and SDSS data to investigate the
three most likely sources of such an event; 1) an extremely luminous supernova;
2) the tidal disruption of a star by the massive nuclear black hole; 3)
variability of the central AGN. We find that CSS100217 was likely an extremely
luminous type IIn supernova that occurred within range of the narrow-line
region of an AGN. We discuss how similar events may have been missed in past
supernova surveys because of confusion with AGN activity.