Arbabi-Bidgoli, S.
Normalized to: Arbabi-Bidgoli, S.
3 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0111581 [pdf] - 46347
Void Scaling and Void Profiles in CDM Models
Submitted: 2001-11-30
An analysis of voids using cosmological N-body simulations of cold dark
matter models is presented. It employs a robust statistics of voids, that was
recently applied to discriminate between data from the Las Campanas Redshift
Survey and different cosmological models. Here we extend the analysis to 3D and
show that typical void sizes D in the simulated galaxy samples obey a linear
scaling relation with the mean galaxy separation lambda: D=D_0+nu*lambda. It
has the same slope nu as in 2D, but with lower absolute void sizes. The scaling
relation is able to discriminate between different cosmologies. For the best
standard LCDM model, the slope of the scaling relation for voids in the dark
matter halos is too steep as compared to the LCRS, with too small void sizes
for well sampled data sets. The scaling relation of voids for dark matter halos
with increasing mass thresholds is even steeper than that for samples of
galaxy-mass halos where we sparse sample the data. This shows the stronger
clustering of more massive halos. Further, we find a correlation of the void
size to its central and environmental average density. While there is little
sign of an evolution in samples of small DM halos with v_{circ} ~ 90 km/s,
voids in halos with circular velocity over 200 km/s are larger at redshift z =
3 due to the smaller halo number density. The flow of dark matter from the
underdense to overdense regions in an early established network of large scale
structure is also imprinted in the evolution of the density profiles with a
relative density decrease in void centers by 0.18 per redshift unit between z=3
and z=0.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0103110 [pdf] - 41327
Quantitative Analysis of the Void Size Distribution in the LCRS and in
CDM Models
Submitted: 2001-03-07
We have analyzed the size distribution of voids in 2D slices of the Las
Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS). The characteristic sizes show a scaling $D =
D_0 + \nu\lambda$ with the mean galaxy separation $\lambda$. Comparison with
mock samples of the LCRS in 2D and 3D, using various simulations, cosmologies
and galaxy identification schemes, gives a similar scaling, but with steeper
slope and a lack of large voids. Best results are obtained for dark matter
halos in a $\Lambda$CDM model.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005063 [pdf] - 35835
Voids in the LCRS versus CDM Models
Submitted: 2000-05-03
We have analyzed the distribution of void sizes in the two-dimensional slices
of the Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS). Fourteen volume-limited subsamples
were extracted from the six slices to cover a large part of the survey and to
test the robustness of the results against cosmic variance. Thirteen samples
were randomly culled to produce homogeneously selected samples. We then studied
the relationship between the cumulative area covered by voids and the void size
as a property of the void hierarchy. We find that the distribution of void
sizes scales with the mean galaxy separation, $\lambda$. In particular, we find
that the size of voids covering half of the area is given by $D_{med} \approx
\lambda + (12\pm3) \h^{-2}$Mpc. Next, by employing an environmental density
threshold criterion to identify mock galaxies, we were able to extend this
analysis to mock samples from dynamical $n$-body simulations of Cold Dark
Matter (CDM) models. To reproduce the observed void statistics, overdensity
thresholds of $\delta_{th} \approx 0 ... 1$ are necessary. We have compared
standard (SCDM), open (OCDM), vacuum energy dominated ($\Lambda$CDM), and
broken scale invariant CDM models (BCDM): we find that both the void coverage
distribution and the two-point correlation function provide important and
complementary information on the large-scale matter distribution. The
dependence of the void statistics on the threshold criterion for the mock
galaxy indentification shows that the galaxy biasing is more crucial for the
void size distribution than are differences between the cosmological models.