sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Angus, Stephen

Normalized to: Angus, S.

4 article(s) in total. 9 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1905.03620  [pdf] - 1881074
$\mathbf{O}(D,D)$ completion of the Friedmann equations
Comments: 28 + 12 pages (main body + title, appendix, and references); 1 figure
Submitted: 2019-05-09
String theory suggests a unique and unambiguous modification to General Relativity: the symmetry of $\mathbf{O}(D,D)$ T-duality promotes the entire closed-string massless NS-NS sector to stringy graviton fields. The symmetry fixes the couplings to other matter fields unambiguously and the Einstein field equations are enriched to comprise $D^{2}+1$ components, dubbed recently as the Einstein Double Field Equations. Here we explore the cosmological implications of this `Stringy Gravity'. We derive the most general homogeneous and isotropic ansatzes for both stringy graviton fields and the stringy energy-momentum tensor. Substituting them into the Einstein Double Field Equations, we obtain the $\mathbf{O}(D,D)$ completion of the Friedmann equations along with a generalized continuity equation. We discuss how this gives an enriched and novel framework beyond typical string cosmology, with solutions that may be characterized by two equation-of-state parameters, $w$ (conventional) and $\lambda$ (new). When $\lambda+3w=1$, the dilaton remains constant throughout the cosmological evolution, and one recovers the standard Friedmann equations for generic matter content (i.e. for any $w$), an improvement over conventional string cosmology where this occurs only for a radiation equation of state ($w=1/3$). We further point out that, in contrast to General Relativity, in Stringy Gravity there is no de Sitter solution arising from either an $\mathbf{O}(D,D)$-symmetric cosmological constant or scalar field with positive energy density.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1403.6473  [pdf] - 894683
Dark Radiation in Anisotropic LARGE Volume Compactifications
Comments: 12 pages, no figures; v3 - expanded discussions, clarified terminology, corrected error in equation (3.11); version to be published in JHEP
Submitted: 2014-03-25, last modified: 2014-10-30
Dark radiation is a compelling extension to $\Lambda$CDM: current experimental results hint at $\Delta N_{\rm eff} \gtrsim 0.5$, which is increased to $\Delta N_{\rm eff} \simeq 1$ if the recent BICEP2 results are included. In recent years dark radiation has been considered in the context of string theory models such as the LARGE Volume Scenario of type IIB string theory, forging a link between present-day cosmological observations and models of physics at the Planck scale. In this paper I consider an extension of the LARGE Volume Scenario in which the bulk volume is stabilised by two moduli instead of one. Consequently, the lightest modulus no longer corresponds to the compactification volume but instead to a transverse direction in the bulk geometry. I focus on scenarios in which sequestering of soft masses is achieved by localising the Standard Model on D3 branes at a singularity. The fraction of dark radiation produced in such models vastly exceeds experimental bounds, ruling out the sequestered LARGE Volume Scenario with two bulk moduli as a model of the early Universe.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1312.3947  [pdf] - 1202247
Soft X-ray Excess in the Coma Cluster from a Cosmic Axion Background
Comments: 43 pages, 11 figures
Submitted: 2013-12-13
We show that the soft X-ray excess in the Coma cluster can be explained by a cosmic background of relativistic axions converting into photons in the cluster magnetic field. We provide a detailed self-contained review of the cluster soft X-ray excess, the proposed astrophysical explanations and the problems they face, and explain how a 0.1-1 keV axion background naturally arises at reheating in many string theory models of the early universe. We study the morphology of the soft excess by numerically propagating axions through stochastic, multi-scale magnetic field models that are consistent with observations of Faraday rotation measures from Coma. By comparing to ROSAT observations of the 0.2-0.4 keV soft excess, we find that the overall excess luminosity is easily reproduced for $g_{a\gamma\gamma} \sim 2 \times 10^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$. The resulting morphology is highly sensitive to the magnetic field power spectrum. For Gaussian magnetic field models, the observed soft excess morphology prefers magnetic field spectra with most power in coherence lengths on ${\cal O}(3 {\rm ~kpc})$ scales over those with most power on ${\cal O}(12 {\rm ~kpc})$ scales. Within this scenario, we bound the mean energy of the axion background to $50\, {\rm eV}\lesssim \langle E_a \rangle \lesssim 250\, {\rm eV}$, the axion mass to $m_a \lesssim 10^{-12}\,\hbox{eV}$, and derive a lower bound on the axion-photon coupling $g_{a\gamma\gamma} \gtrsim \sqrt{0.5/\Delta N_{\rm eff}}\, 1.4 \times 10^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1305.4128  [pdf] - 760084
Loop corrections to Delta N_eff in large volume models
Comments: 14 pages, 3 figures; v2: Version to appear in JHEP. Expanded introduction to clarify arguments, assumptions and applicability of results; added references
Submitted: 2013-05-17, last modified: 2013-11-21
In large volume models reheating is driven by the decays of the volume modulus to the visible sector, while the decays to its axion partners result in dark radiation. In this article we discuss the impact of loop corrections on the only model-independent visible decay channel: the decay into Higgs pairs via a Giudice-Masiero term. Including such radiative effects leads to a more precise determination of the relative fraction of dark radiation, since by contrast all loop corrections to the volume axion decay mode are Planck suppressed. Assuming an MSSM spectrum and that the Giudice-Masiero coupling is fixed at the string scale by a shift symmetry in the Higgs sector, we arrive at a prediction for the effective number of neutrinos. The result turns out to be too large to be consistent with data, highly disfavouring the minimal model.