Normalized to: Andrade-Oliveira, F.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.02375 [pdf] - 1877871
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andersen, P.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avelino, A.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Banik, N.;
Bassett, B. A.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Calcino, J.;
Camacho, H.;
Campos, A.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carollo, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Challis, P.;
Chan, K. C.;
Chang, C.;
Childress, M.;
Clocchiatti, A.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Davis, T. M.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Galbany, L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoormann, J. K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kasai, E.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kim, A. G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Lemos, P.;
Lewis, G. F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Macaulay, E.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Mandel, K. S.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sharp, R.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Sommer, N. E.;
Swann, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Weaverdyck, N.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-06, last modified: 2019-05-06
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a
powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark
energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed
Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak
gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results
from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark
energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other
experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the
probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark
energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be
consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the
baryon density of $\Omega_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of
early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of
large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude
advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the
next decade.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06209 [pdf] - 1794662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic
Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Allam, S.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Camacho, H.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kokron, N.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Manera, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-12-09
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the
BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark
Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies
distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and
a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as
fully described in a companion paper, using a color/magnitude selection that
optimizes trade-offs between number density and redshift uncertainty. We
investigate the BAO signal in the projected clustering using three conventions,
the angular separation, the co-moving transverse separation, and spherical
harmonics. Further, we compare results obtained from template based and machine
learning photometric redshift determinations. We use 1800 simulations that
approximate our sample in order to produce covariance matrices and allow us to
validate our distance scale measurement methodology. We measure the angular
diameter distance, $D_A$, at the effective redshift of our sample divided by
the true physical scale of the BAO feature, $r_{\rm d}$. We obtain close to a 4
per cent distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff}=0.81)/r_{\rm d} = 10.75\pm
0.43 $. These results are consistent with the flat $\Lambda$CDM concordance
cosmological model supported by numerous other recent experimental results. All
data products are publicly available here:
https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1/bao
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06232 [pdf] - 1723432
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
Avila, S.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Camacho, N. Banik H.;
Kokron, N.;
Chan, K. C.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Gomes, R.;
Gomes, D.;
Lima, M.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Friedrich, O.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Annis, J.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyt, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-12-17, last modified: 2018-07-27
Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data,
both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the
optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this
paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the
Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance,
observational volume, redshift distribution and uncertainty, and redshift
dependent clustering. The simulated samples were built upon HALOGEN (Avila et
al. 2015) halo catalogues, based on a $2LPT$ density field with an exponential
bias. For each of them, a lightcone is constructed by the superposition of
snapshots in the redshift range $0.45<z<1.4$. Uncertainties introduced by
so-called photometric redshifts estimators were modelled with a
\textit{double-skewed-Gaussian} curve fitted to the data. We also introduce a
hybrid HOD-HAM model with two free parameters that are adjusted to achieve a
galaxy bias evolution $b(z_{\rm ph})$ that matches the data at the 1-$\sigma$
level in the range $0.6<z_{\rm ph}<1.0$. We further analyse the galaxy mock
catalogues and compare their clustering to the data using the angular
correlation function $ w(\theta)$, the comoving transverse separation
clustering $\xi_{\mu<0.8}(s_{\perp})$ and the angular power spectrum $C_\ell$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.10163 [pdf] - 1897837
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Galaxy Angular
Power Spectrum
Camacho, H.;
Kokron, N.;
Andrade-Oliveira, F.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Lima, M.;
Lacasa, F.;
Sobreira, F.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Avila, S.;
Chan, K. C.;
Crocce, M.;
Ross, A. J.;
Troja, A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Kirk, D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Miquel, R.;
Percival, W. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-07-26
We use data from the first-year (Y1) observations of the DES collaboration to
measure the galaxy angular power spectrum (APS), and search for its BAO feature
using a template-fitting method. We test our methodology in a sample of 1800
DES Y1-like mock catalogs. The APS is measured with the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method,
using pixelized maps constructed from the mock catalogs and the DES mask. The
covariance matrix of the $C_\ell$'s in these tests are also obtained from the
mock catalogs. We use templates to model the measured spectra and estimate
template parameters firstly from the $C_\ell$'s of the mocks using two
different methods, a maximum likelihood estimator and a MCMC, finding
consistent results with a good reduced $\chi^2$. Robustness tests are performed
to estimate the impact of different choices of settings used in our analysis.
After these tests on mocks, we apply our method to a galaxy sample constructed
from DES Y1 data specifically for LSS studies. This catalog comprises galaxies
within an effective area of 1318 deg$^2$ and $0.6<z<1.0$. We fit the observed
spectra with our optimized templates, considering models with and without BAO
features. We find that the DES Y1 data favors a model with BAO at the
$2.6\,\sigma$ C.L. with a best-fit shift parameter of $\alpha=1.023\pm 0.047$.
However, the goodness-of-fit is somewhat poor, with $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.49. We
identify a possible cause of this issue and show that using a theoretical
covariance matrix obtained from $C_\ell$'s that are better adjusted to data
results in an improved value of $\chi^2/$(dof) = 1.36 which is similar to the
value obtained with the real-space analysis. Our results correspond to a
distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff} = 0.81)/r_d = 10.65 \pm 0.49$,
consistent with the main DES BAO findings. This is a companion paper to the
main DES BAO article showing the details of the harmonic space analysis.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.00646 [pdf] - 1663193
Bayesian correction of $H(z)$ data uncertainties
Submitted: 2017-09-02, last modified: 2017-10-11
We compile 41 $H(z)$ data from literature and use them to constrain
O$\Lambda$CDM and flat $\Lambda$CDM parameters. We show that the available
$H(z)$ suffers from uncertainties overestimation and propose a Bayesian method
to reduce them. As a result of this method, using $H(z)$ only, we find, in the
context of O$\Lambda$CDM, $H_0=69.5\pm2.5\mathrm{\,km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$,
$\Omega_m=0.242\pm0.036$ and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.68\pm0.14$. In the context of
flat $\Lambda$CDM model, we have found
$H_0=70.4\pm1.2\mathrm{\,km\,s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}}$ and $\Omega_m=0.256\pm0.014$.
This corresponds to an uncertainty reduction of up to 30\% when compared to the
uncorrected analysis in both cases.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.04077 [pdf] - 1580886
Bayesian analysis of CCDM Models
Submitted: 2016-12-13, last modified: 2017-02-10
Creation of Cold Dark Matter (CCDM), in the context of Einstein Field
Equations, leads to negative creation pressure, which can be used to explain
the accelerated expansion of the Universe. In this work we tested six different
spatially flat models for matter creation using statistical tools, at light of
SN Ia data: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion
(BIC) and Bayesian Evidence (BE). These approaches allow to compare models
considering goodness of fit and number of free parameters, penalizing excess of
complexity. We find that JO model is slightly favoured over LJO/$\Lambda$CDM
model, however, neither of these, nor $\Gamma=3\alpha H_0$ model can be
discarded from the current analysis. Three other scenarios are discarded either
from poor fitting, either from excess of free parameters.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.04037 [pdf] - 1470527
Can Dark Matter be a Scalar Field?
Submitted: 2015-04-15, last modified: 2016-07-21
In this paper we study a real scalar field as a possible candidate to explain
the dark matter in the universe. In the context of a free scalar field with
quadratic potential, we have used Union 2.1 SN Ia observational data jointly
with a Planck prior over the dark matter density parameter to set a lower limit
on the dark matter mass as $m\geq0.12H_0^{-1}$ eV ($c=\hbar=1$). For the recent
value of the Hubble constant indicated by the Hubble Space Telescope, namely
$H_0=73\pm1.8$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$, this leads to $m\geq1.56\times10^{-33}$
eV at 99.7\% c.l. Such value is much smaller than $m\sim 10^{-22}$ eV
previously estimated for some models. Nevertheless, it is still in agreement
with them once we have not found evidences for a upper limit on the scalar
field dark matter mass from SN Ia analysis. In practice, it confirms free real
scalar field as a viable candidate for dark matter in agreement with previous
studies in the context of density perturbations, which include scalar field
self interaction.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02595 [pdf] - 1342733
CCDM Model with Spatial Curvature and The Breaking of "Dark Degeneracy"
Submitted: 2015-03-09
Creation of Cold Dark Matter (CCDM), in the context of Einstein Field
Equations, leads to a negative creation pressure, which can be used to explain
the accelerated expansion of the Universe. Recently, it has been shown that the
dynamics of expansion of such models can not be distinguished from the
concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, even at higher orders in the evolution of
density perturbations, leading at the so called "dark degeneracy". However,
depending on the form of the CDM creation rate, the inclusion of spatial
curvature leads to a different behavior of CCDM when compared to $\Lambda$CDM,
even at background level. With a simple form for the creation rate, namely,
$\Gamma\propto\frac{1}{H}$, we show that this model can be distinguished from
$\Lambda$CDM, provided the Universe has some amount of spatial curvature.
Observationally, however, the current limits on spatial flatness from CMB
indicate that neither of the models are significantly favored against the other
by current data, at least in the background level.