Normalized to: Anderhalden, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.5960 [pdf] - 1179439
Warm dark matter does not do better than cold dark matter in solving
small-scale inconsistencies
Submitted: 2013-09-23, last modified: 2014-12-08
Over the last decade, warm dark matter (WDM) has been repeatedly proposed as
an alternative scenario to the standard cold dark matter (CDM) one, potentially
resolving several disagreements between the CDM model and observations on small
scales. Here, we reconsider the most important CDM small-scale discrepancies in
the light of recent observational constraints on WDM. As a result, we find that
a conventional thermal (or thermal-like) WDM cosmology with a particle mass in
agreement with Lyman-$\alpha$ is nearly indistinguishable from CDM on the
relevant scales and therefore fails to alleviate any of the small-scale
problems. The reason for this failure is that the power spectrum of
conventional WDM falls off too rapidly. To maintain WDM as a significantly
different alternative to CDM, more evolved production mechanisms leading to
multiple dark matter components or a gradually decreasing small-scale power
spectrum have to be considered.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.0003 [pdf] - 1159412
Density Profiles of CDM Microhalos and their Implications for
Annihilation Boost Factors
Submitted: 2013-01-31, last modified: 2013-04-04
In a standard cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology, microhalos at the CDM cutoff
scale are the first and smallest objects expected to form in the universe. Here
we present results of high resolution simulations of three representative
roughly Earth-mass microhalos in order to determine their inner density
profile. We find that CDM microhalos in simulations without a cutoff in the
power spectrum roughly follow the NFW density profile, just like the much
larger CDM halos on galaxy and galaxy cluster scales. But having a cutoff in
the initial power spectrum at a typical neutralino free streaming scale of
$10^{-7} M_{\odot}$ makes their inner density profiles considerably steeper,
i.e. $\rho \propto r^{-(1.3-1.4)}$, in good agreement with the results from
Ishiyama et al. (2010). An extrapolation of the halo and subhalo mass functions
down to the cutoff scale indicates that microhalos are extremely abundant
throughout the present day dark matter distribution and might contribute
significantly to indirect dark matter detection signals. Assuming a transition
from a NFW to a steeper inner profile ($\rho \propto r^{-1.4}$) two orders of
magnitude above the cutoff scale, the total boost factor for a Milky Way sized
dark matter halo increases from about 3.5 to 4. We further find that CDM
microhalo concentrations are consistent with the Bullock et al. (2001) model
and clearly rule out simplistic power law models for the mass dependence of
concentrations and subhalo annihilation, which would erroneously lead to very
large boost factors (a few hundred for galaxy halos and over 1000 for
clusters).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.2967 [pdf] - 1158474
Hints on the Nature of Dark Matter from the Properties of Milky Way
Satellites
Submitted: 2012-12-12, last modified: 2013-04-02
The nature of dark matter is still unknown and one of the most fundamental
scientific mysteries. Although successfully describing large scales, the
standard cold dark matter model (CDM) exhibits possible shortcomings on
galactic and sub-galactic scales. It is exactly at these highly non-linear
scales where strong astrophysical constraints can be set on the nature of the
dark matter particle. While observations of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest probe the
matter power spectrum in the mildly non-linear regime, satellite galaxies of
the Milky Way provide an excellent laboratory as a test of the underlying
cosmology on much smaller scales. Here we present results from a set of high
resolution simulations of a Milky Way sized dark matter halo in eight distinct
cosmologies: CDM, warm dark matter (WDM) with a particle mass of 2 keV and six
different cold plus warm dark matter (C+WDM) models, varying the fraction,
$f_{\rm wdm}$, and the mass, $m_{\rm wdm}$, of the warm component. We used
three different observational tests based on Milky Way satellite observations:
the total satellite abundance, their radial distribution and their mass
profile. We show that the requirement of simultaneously satisfying all three
constraints sets very strong limits on the nature of dark matter. This shows
the power of a multi-dimensional small scale approach in ruling out models
which would be still allowed by large scale observations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.3788 [pdf] - 1124169
The Galactic Halo in Mixed Dark Matter Cosmologies
Submitted: 2012-06-17, last modified: 2013-04-02
A possible solution to the small scale problems of the cold dark matter (CDM)
scenario is that the dark matter consists of two components, a cold and a warm
one. We perform a set of high resolution simulations of the Milky Way halo
varying the mass of the WDM particle ($m_{\rm WDM}$) and the cosmic dark matter
mass fraction in the WDM component ($\bar{f}_{\rm W}$). The scaling ansatz
introduced in combined analysis of LHC and astroparticle searches postulates
that the relative contribution of each dark matter component is the same
locally as on average in the Universe (e.g. $f_{\rm W,\odot} = \bar{f}_{\rm
W}$). Here we find however, that the normalised local WDM fraction ($f_{\rm
W,\odot}$ / $\bar{f}_{\rm W}$) depends strongly on $m_{\rm WDM}$ for $m_{\rm
WDM} <$ 1 keV. Using the scaling ansatz can therefore introduce significant
errors into the interpretation of dark matter searches. To correct this issue a
simple formula that fits the local dark matter densities of each component is
provided.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.1282 [pdf] - 1116416
Cores in warm dark matter haloes: a Catch 22 problem
Submitted: 2012-02-06, last modified: 2012-05-10
The free streaming of warm dark matter particles dampens the fluctuation
spectrum, flattens the mass function of haloes and imprints a fine grained
phase density limit for dark matter structures. The phase space density limit
is expected to imprint a constant density core at the halo center on the
contrary to what happens for cold dark matter. We explore these effects using
high resolution simulations of structure formation in different warm dark
matter scenarios. We find that the size of the core we obtain in simulated
haloes is in good agreement with theoretical expectations based on Liouville's
theorem. However, our simulations show that in order to create a significant
core, (r_c~1 kpc), in a dwarf galaxy (M~1e10 Msun), a thermal candidate with a
mass as low as 0.1 keV is required. This would fully prevent the formation of
the dwarf galaxy in the first place. For candidates satisfying large scale
structure constrains (m_wdm larger than 1-2 keV) the expected size of the core
is of the order of 10 (20) pc for a dark matter halo with a mass of 1e10 (1e8)
Msun. We conclude that "standard" warm dark matter is not viable solution for
explaining the presence of cored density profiles in low mass galaxies.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1102.5736 [pdf] - 437191
The Total Mass of Dark Matter Haloes
Submitted: 2011-02-28
The simple, conventional dark matter halo mass definitions commonly used in
cosmological simulations ("virial" mass, FoF mass, $M_{50,100,200,...}$) only
capture part of the collapsed material and are therefore inconsistent with the
halo mass concept used in analytical treatments of structure formation.
Simulations have demonstrated that typical dark matter particle orbits extend
out to about 90 per cent of their turnaround radius, which results in apocenter
passages outside of the current "virial" radius on the first and also on the
second orbit. Here we describe how the formation history of haloes can be used
to identify those particles which took part in the halo collapse, but are
missed by conventional group-finders because of their remote present location.
These particles are added to the part of the halo already identified by FoF.
The corrected masses of dark haloes are significantly higher (the median mass
increase is 25 per cent) and there is a considerable shift of the halo mass
function towards the Press & Schechter form. We conclude that meaningful
quantitative comparisons between (semi-)analytic predictions of halo properties
(e.g. mass functions, mass accretion rates, merger rates, spatial clustering,
etc.) and simulation results will require using the same halo definition in
both approaches.