Normalized to: Altmann, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.06471 [pdf] - 1588555
Ground-based astrometry calibrated by Gaia DR1: new perspectives in
asteroid orbit determination
Spoto, F.;
Tanga, P.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Desmars, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Mignard, F.;
Altmann, M.;
Herald, D.;
Marchant, J.;
Barache, C.;
Carlucci, T.;
Lister, T.;
Taris, F.
Submitted: 2017-09-19
The Gaia Data Release 1 (GDR1) is a first, important step on the path of
evolution of astrometric accuracy towards a much improved situation. Although
asteroids are not present in GDR1, this intermediate release already impacts
asteroid astrometry. Our goal is to investigate how the GDR1 can change the
approach to a few typical problems, including the determination of orbits from
short-arc astrometry, the exploitation of stellar occultations, and the impact
risk assessment. We employ optimised asteroid orbit determination tools, and
study the resulting orbit accuracy and post-fit residuals. For this goal, we
use selected ground-based asteroid astrometry, and occultation events observed
in the past. All measurements are calibrated by using GDR1 stars. We show that,
by adopting GDR1, very short measurement arcs can already provide interesting
orbital solutions, capable of correctly identifying Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs)
and providing a much more accurate risk rating. We also demonstrate that
occultations, previously used to derive asteroid size and shapes, now reach a
new level of accuracy at which they can be fruitfully used to obtain astrometry
at the level of accuracy of Gaia star positions.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01447 [pdf] - 1585552
Characterizing the astrometric precision limit for moving targets
observed with digital-array detectors
Submitted: 2017-07-05
Aims. We investigate the maximum astrometric precision that can be reached on
moving targets observed with digital-sensor arrays, and provide an estimate for
its ultimate lower limit based on the Cram\'er-Rao bound.
Methods. We extend previous work on one-dimensional Gaussian point-spread
functions (PSFs) focusing on moving objects and extending the scope to
two-dimensional array detectors. In this study the PSF of a stationary
point-source celestial body is replaced by its convolution with a linear
motion, thus effectively modeling the spread function of a moving target.
Results. The expressions of the Cram\'er-Rao lower bound deduced by this
method allow us to study in great detail the limit of astrometric precision
that can be reached for moving celestial objects, and to compute an optimal
exposure time according to different observational parameters such as seeing,
detector pixel size, decentering, and elongation of the source caused by its
drift. Comparison to simulated and real data shows that the predictions of our
simple model are consistent with observations.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.02629 [pdf] - 1553982
Hot Stuff for One Year (HSOY) - A 583 million star proper motion
catalogue derived from Gaia DR1 and PPMXL
Submitted: 2017-01-10, last modified: 2017-02-22
Recently, the first installment of data from ESA's Gaia astrometric satellite
mission (Gaia-DR1) was released, containing positions of more than 1 billion
stars with unprecedented precision, as well as only proper motions and
parallaxes, however only for a subset of 2 million objects. The second release,
due in late 2017 or early 2018, will include those quantities for most objects.
In order to provide a dataset that bridges the time gap between the Gaia-DR1
and Gaia-DR2 releases and partly remedies the lack of proper motions in the
former, HSOY ("Hot Stuff for One Year") was created as a hybrid catalogue
between Gaia-DR1 and ground-based astrometry, featuring proper motions (but no
parallaxes) for a large fraction of the DR1 objects. While not attempting to
compete with future Gaia releases in terms of data quality or number of
objects, the aim of HSOY is to provide improved proper motions partly based on
Gaia data, allowing some studies to be carried out just now or as pilot studies
for later larger projects requiring higher-precision data. The HSOY catalogue
was compiled using the positions taken from Gaia-DR1 combined with the input
data from the PPMXL catalogue, employing the same weighted least-squares
technique that was used to assemble the PPMXL catalogue itself. Results. This
effort resulted in a four-parameter astrometric catalogue containing
583,000,000 objects, with Gaia-DR1 quality positions and proper motions with
precisions from significantly less than 1 mas/yr to 5 mas/yr, depending on the
object's brightness and location on the sky.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.08044 [pdf] - 1531735
A test field for Gaia. Radial velocity catalogue of stars in the South
Ecliptic Pole
Frémat, Y.;
Altmann, M.;
Pancino, E.;
Soubiran, C.;
Jofré, P.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Heiter, U.;
Royer, F.;
Seabroke, G.;
Sordo, R.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Martayan, C.;
Thévenin, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Blomme, R.;
David, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Katz, D.;
Viala, Y.;
Boudreault, S.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Lobel, A.;
Meisenheimer, K.;
Nordlander, T.;
Raskin, G.;
Royer, P.;
Zorec, J.
Submitted: 2016-09-26
Gaia is a space mission currently measuring the five astrometric parameters
as well as spectrophotometry of at least 1 billion stars to G = 20.7 mag with
unprecedented precision. The sixth parameter in phase space (radial velocity)
is also measured thanks to medium-resolution spectroscopy being obtained for
the 150 million brightest stars. During the commissioning phase, two fields,
one around each ecliptic pole, have been repeatedly observed to assess and to
improve the overall satellite performances as well as the associated reduction
and analysis software. A ground-based photometric and spectroscopic survey was
therefore initiated in 2007, and is still running in order to gather as much
information as possible about the stars in these fields. This work is of
particular interest to the validation of the Radial Velocity Spectrometer (RVS)
outputs. The paper presents the radial velocity measurements performed for the
Southern targets in the 12 - 17 R magnitude range on high- to mid-resolution
spectra obtained with the GIRAFFE and UVES spectrographs.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1212.4566 [pdf] - 1158604
On the Origin of Mass Segregation in NGC 3603
Submitted: 2012-12-18
We present deep Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2
photometry of the young HD 97950 star cluster in the giant H {\sc ii} region
NGC 3603. The data were obtained in 1997 and 2007 permitting us to derive
membership based on proper motions of the stars. Our data are consistent with
an age of 1 Myr for the HD 97950 cluster. A possible age spread, if present in
the cluster, appears to be small. The global slope of the
incompleteness-corrected mass function for member stars within 60$"$ is $\rm
\Gamma=-0.88\pm0.15$, which is flatter than the value of a Salpeter slope of
-1.35. The radially varying mass function shows pronounced mass segregation
ranging from slopes of $-0.26 \pm 0.32$ in the inner $5"$ to $-0.94\pm 0.36$ in
the outermost annulus ($40"$ -- $60"$). Stars more massive than 50 M$_{\odot}$
are found only in the cluster center. The $\Lambda$ minimum spanning tree
technique confirms significant mass segregation down to 30 M$_{\odot}$. The
dependence of $\Lambda$ on mass, i.e., that high-mass stars are more segregated
than low mass stars, and the (weak) dependence of the velocity dispersion on
stellar mass might imply that the mass segregation is dynamical in origin.
While primordial segregation cannot be excluded, the properties of the mass
segregation indicate that dynamical mass segregation may have been the dominant
process for segregation of high-mass stars.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1109.4685 [pdf] - 1084301
The Evolution of Ly-alpha Emitting Galaxies Between z = 2.1 and z = 3.1
Ciardullo, Robin;
Gronwall, Caryl;
Wolf, Christopher;
McCathran, Emily;
Bond, Nicholas A.;
Gawiser, Eric;
Guaita, Lucia;
Feldmeier, John . J.;
Treister, Ezequiel;
Padilla, Nelson;
Francke, Harold;
Matkovic, Ana;
Altmann, Martin;
Herrera, David
Submitted: 2011-09-21
We describe the results of a new, wide-field survey for z=3.1 Ly-alpha
emission-line galaxies (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South
(ECDF-S). By using a nearly top-hat 5010 Angstrom filter and complementary
broadband photometry from the MUSYC survey, we identify a complete sample of
141 objects with monochromatic fluxes brighter than 2.4E-17 ergs/cm^2/s and
observers-frame equivalent widths greater than ~ 80 Angstroms (i.e., 20
Angstroms in the rest-frame of Ly-alpha). The bright-end of this dataset is
dominated by x-ray sources and foreground objects with GALEX detections, but
when these interlopers are removed, we are still left with a sample of 130 LAE
candidates, 39 of which have spectroscopic confirmations. This sample overlaps
the set of objects found in an earlier ECDF-S survey, but due to our filter's
redder bandpass, it also includes 68 previously uncataloged sources. We confirm
earlier measurements of the z=3.1 LAE emission-line luminosity function, and
show that an apparent anti-correlation between equivalent width and continuum
brightness is likely due to the effect of correlated errors in our
heteroskedastic dataset. Finally, we compare the properties of z=3.1 LAEs to
LAEs found at z=2.1. We show that in the ~1 Gyr after z~3, the LAE luminosity
function evolved significantly, with L* fading by ~0.4 mag, the number density
of sources with L > 1.5E42 ergs/s declining by ~50%, and the equivalent width
scale-length contracting from 70^{+7}_{-5} Angstroms to 50^{+9}_{-6} Angstroms.
When combined with literature results, our observations demonstrate that over
the redshift range z~0 to z~4, LAEs contain less than ~10% of the
star-formation rate density of the universe.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.3006 [pdf] - 1032530
The Rest-frame Ultraviolet Light Profile Shapes of Ly-alpha-Emitting
Galaxies at z=3.1
Submitted: 2010-05-17, last modified: 2011-08-16
We present a rest-frame ultraviolet morphological analysis of 78 resolved,
high S/N z ~ 3.1 Lyman Alpha Emitters (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field
South (ECDF-S). Using HST/ACS V -band images taken as part of the GEMS, GOODS,
and HUDF surveys. For each LAE system identified via our ground-based
narrow-band imaging, we have identified those LAE systems with multiple
components. We measure the concentration index and present the results of our
GALFIT fits for ellipticity, Sersic index, and sizes for each resolved
component with S/N > 30 as well as for each LAE system with S/N > 30. The LAEs
show a heterogeneous distribution of morphologies while the ma jority tend to
be highly concentrated and compact in size. We only measure the morphological
properties of resolved LAEs. For systems showing multiple components we also
measured the morphology of the individual components. The resolved LAEs are
highly concentrated (2 < C < 4) and show a similar distribution to that
measured for stars, suggesting that this diagnostic is a poor discriminator
near the resolution limit. The measured ellipticities for components show a
distribution peaked at {\epsilon} ~ 0.55 which is significantly different from
the flat distribution of ellipticities observed for local spiral galaxies and
is similar to the distribution found for Lyman-break galaxies at the same
redshift. There is a wide range of best-fit Sersic indices (1 < n < 10) with
the majority being between 0 < n < 2. The distribution is similar to the
distribution of Sersic indices seen locally. A visual inspection of the images
suggests a qualitative morphological transition at n ~ 2, with small-n LAEs
having extended or multimodal light distributions and relatively little diffuse
emission and large-n LAEs have compact central components surrounded by diffuse
emission.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.3141 [pdf] - 1083412
First ground-based CCD proper motions for Fornax II: Final results
Submitted: 2011-08-15
We present the first entirely ground-based astrometric determination of the
proper motion for the Fornax Local Group Dwarf Spheroidal satellite galaxy of
the Milky Way, using CCD data acquired with the ESO 3.5 m NTT telescope at La
Silla Observatory in Chile. Our unweighted mean from five Quasar fields in the
background of Fornax, used as fiducial reference points, leads to $\mu_\alpha
\cos \delta=0.62 \pm 0.16$ $\masy$, and $\mu_\delta=-0.53 \pm 0.15$ $\masy$. A
detailed comparison with all previous measurements of this quantity seems to
imply that there is still no convincing convergence to a single value, perhaps
indicating the existence of unnacounted systematic effects in (some of) these
measurements. From all available proper motion and radial velocity measurements
for Fornax, we compute Fornax's orbital parameters and their uncertainty using
a realistic Galactic potential and a Monte Carlo simulation. Properties of the
derived orbits are then compared to main star formation episodes in the history
of Fornax.
All published proper motion values imply that Fornax has recently (200-300
Myr ago) approached perigalacticon at a distance of $\sim$150 kpc. However, the
derived period exhibits a large scatter, as does the apogalacticon. Our orbit,
being the most energetic, implies a very large apogalactic distance of $\sim
950$ kpc. If this were the case, then Fornax would be a representative of an
hypervelocity MW satellite in late infall.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.4978 [pdf] - 1033976
Constraints on the origin of the massive, hot, and rapidly rotating
magnetic white dwarf RE J 0317-853 from an HST parallax measurement
Submitted: 2010-07-28, last modified: 2010-08-09
We use the parallax measurements of RE J 0317-853 to determine its mass,
radius, and cooling age and thereby constrain its evolutionary origins. We
observed RE J 0317-853 with the the Hubble Space Telescope's Fine Guidance
System to measure the parallax of RE J 0317-853 and its binary companion, the
non-magnetic white dwarf LB 9802. In addition, we acquired spectra of
comparison stars with the Boller & Chivens spectrograph of the SMARTS telescope
to correct the parallax zero point. For the corrected parallax, we determine
the radius, mass, and the cooling age with the help of evolutionary models from
the literature. The properties of RE J 0317-853 are constrained using the
parallax information. We discuss the different cases of the core composition
and the uncertain effective temperature. We confirm that RE J 0317-853 is close
to the Chandrasekhar's mass limit in all cases and almost as old as its
companion LB 9802. The precise evolutionary history of RE J 0317-853 depends on
our knowledge of its effective temperature. It is possible that it had a single
star progenitor possible if we assume that the effective temperature is at the
cooler end of the possible range from 30000 to 50000; if T_eff is instead at
the hotter end, a binary-merger scenario for RE J 0317-853 becomes more
plausible.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.4855 [pdf] - 1032755
Proper motions of Local Group dwarf spheroidal galaxies I: First
ground-based results for Fornax
Submitted: 2010-05-26
In this paper we present in detail the methodology and the first results of a
ground-based program to determine the absolute proper motion of the Fornax
dwarf spheroidal galaxy.
The proper motion was determined using bona-fide Fornax star members measured
with respect to a fiducial at-rest background spectroscopically confirmed
Quasar, \qso. Our homogeneous measurements, based on this one Quasar gives a
value of (\mua,\mud)$ = (0.64 \pm 0.08, -0.01 \pm 0.11)$ \masy. There are only
two other (astrometric) determinations for the transverse motion of Fornax: one
based on a combination of plates and HST data, and another (of higher internal
precision) based on HST data. We show that our proper motion errors are similar
to those derived from HST measurements on individual QSOs. We provide evidence
that, as far as we can determine it, our motion is not affected by magnitude,
color, or other potential systematic effects. Last epoch measurements and
reductions are underway for other four Quasar fields of this galaxy, which,
when combined, should yield proper motions with a weighted mean error of
$\sim50\,\mu$as y$^{-1}$, allowing us to place important constraints on the
orbit of Fornax.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2235 [pdf] - 315985
Sizes of Lyman-Alpha-Emitting Galaxies and Their Rest-Frame Ultraviolet
Components at z=3.1
Submitted: 2009-07-13, last modified: 2009-09-21
We present a rest-frame ultraviolet analysis of ~120 z~3.1 Lyman Alpha
Emitters (LAEs) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (ECDF-S). Using Hubble
Space Telescope (HST) images taken as part of the Galaxy Evolution From
Morphology and SEDS (GEMS) survey, Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey
(GOODS), and Hubble Ultradeep Field (HUDF) surveys, we analyze the sizes of
LAEs, as well as the spatial distribution of their components, which are
defined as distinct clumps of UV-continuum emission. We set an upper limit of
~1 kpc (~0.1") on the rms offset between the centroids of the continuum and
Lyman-alpha emission. The star formation rates of LAE components inferred from
the rest-frame ultraviolet continuum range from ~0.1 M_{sun}/yr to ~5$
M_{sun}/yr. A subsample of LAEs with coverage in multiple surveys (at different
imaging depths) suggests that one needs a signal-to-noise ratio, S/N>~30, in
order to make a robust estimate of the half-light radius of an LAE system. The
majority of LAEs have observed half-light radii <~2 kpc, and LAE components
typically have observed half-light radii <~1.5 kpc (<~ 0.2"). Although only
~50% of the detected LAE components are resolved at GOODS depth, the brightest
(V<~26.3) are all resolved in both GOODS and GEMS. Since we find little
evidence for a correlation between the rest-UV sizes and magnitudes of LAEs,
the majority should be resolved in a deeper survey at the ~0.05" angular
resolution of HST. Most of the multi-component LAEs identified in shallow
frames become connected in deeper images, suggesting that the majority of the
rest-UV "clumps" are individual star-forming regions within a single system.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1050 [pdf] - 12399
Hypervelocity Stars: Young and Heavy or Old and Light?
Submitted: 2008-05-07
The first three hyper-velocity stars (HVS) unbound to the Galaxy were
serendipitously discovered in 2005. The only suggested origin of hyper-velocity
stars is the Galactic Centre as it hosts a super-massive black hole capable of
accelerating stars to such high velocities. Only one HVS, the sdO star US 708,
is known to be an old low mass star, while HE 0437$-$5439 is an apparently
normal early-type B-star, too short-lived to originate from the Galactic
Centre, but could possibly come from the LMC. A systematic survey has led to
the discovery of seven new HVS of late B-type (similar to the prototype HVS1),
which can either be massive stars 3 M(sun) or horizontal branch stars,
sufficiently long-lived to have travelled from the Galactic Centre. We present
new spectral analyses of five known HVS as well as of a newly discovered
candidate. It is possible that the late B-type HVS are a mix of main sequence
and evolved BHB stars. In view of the time scale problem we revisit HE
0437$-$5439 and discuss a possible subluminous nature of this star.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.4795 [pdf] - 9595
Is a binary fraction-age relation responsible for the lack of EHB
binaries in globular clusters?
Submitted: 2008-01-30
The recently-discovered lack of close binaries, among extreme horizontal
branch (EHB) stars in Galactic globular clusters, has thus far constituted a
major puzzle, in view of the fact that blue subdwarf stars - the field
counterparts of cluster EHB stars - are well-known to present a high binary
fraction. In this Letter, we provide new results that confirm the lack of close
EHB binaries in globular clusters, and present a first scenario to explain the
difference between field and cluster EHB stars. First, in order to confirm that
the lack of EHB binaries in globular clusters is a statistically robust result,
we undertook a new analysis of 145 horizontal branch stars in NGC6752, out of
which forty-one belong to the EHB. To search for radial-velocity variations as
a function of time, we repeated high-resolution (R=18500) spectroscopy of all
stars, four times during a single night of observations. We detected a single,
hot (25000 K), radial-velocity variable star as a close-binary candidate. From
these results, we estimate an upper-limit for the close (period P < 5 day)
binary fraction f among NGC6752 EHB stars of 16% (95% confidence level), with
the most probable value being f=4%. Thus our results clearly confirm the lack
of close binaries among the hot HB stars in this cluster. We suggest that the
confirmed discrepancy between the binary fractions for field and cluster EHB
stars is the consequence of an f-age relation, with close binaries being more
likely in the case of younger systems. We analyze theoretical and observational
results available in the literature, which support this scenario. If so, an age
difference between the EHB progenitors in the field and in clusters, the former
being younger (on average) by up to several Gyr, would naturally account for
the startling differences in binary fraction between the two populations.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.1755 [pdf] - 6924
Meet the COG's
Submitted: 2007-11-12
Kinematics combined with detailed element abundances provide the method of
analysis of stellar populations using as much available information as
possible, in contrast to other methods. Here we employ this technique on local
HBA stars in an ongoing programme to search for omega Centauri debris among
these objects, which led us to discover another group of stars with very
similar kinematics and abundances, the Cometary Orbit Group (COG). We also
comment on the future of this kind of undertaking in the Gaia era.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.0506 [pdf] - 6693
Binaries among Extreme Horizontal Branch Stars in Globular Clusters
Submitted: 2007-11-04
Following a review of our present knowledge about blue subdwarf stars in
globular clusters, we present an overview of the results of searches for close
binaries among these stars, including results previously published in the
literature and reporting recent and preliminary results of new data. Previous
investigations revealed a lack of close systems in NGC 6752, which we confirm
with new, more extensive observations. Our estimate of the close binary
fraction in this cluster is only 4%. From a review of the relevant literature,
there are indications that a low close binary fraction among extreme horizontal
branch (EHB) stars is a common feature in globular star clusters. On the other
hand, the field EHB population shows evidence of a remarkably high binary
fraction. Such a difference among globular cluster and field populations,
although not yet explained in detail on the basis of theoretical models, must
necessarily be related to different formation histories for EHB stars in the
field and in clusters. In this framework, preliminary results indicate that
close systems could be relatively common in the peculiar globular cluster NGC
2808, although the sample of studied stars is still small. This would imply
that not all clusters share the same behavior, as far as EHB star formation is
concerned. We briefly explore possible explanations for these results.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.0600 [pdf] - 5595
A Search for EHB Pulsators in the Globular Cluster NGC 6752
Catelan, M.;
Prieto, G. E.;
Zoccali, M.;
Weidner, C.;
Stetson, P. B.;
Bidin, C. Moni;
Altmann, M.;
Smith, H. A.;
Pritzl, B. J.;
Borissova, J.;
De Medeiros, J. R.
Submitted: 2007-10-02
We describe the status of a project whose main goal is to detect variability
along the extreme horizontal branch of the globular cluster NGC 6752. Based on
Magellan 6.5m data, preliminary light curves are presented for some candidate
variables. By combining our time-series data, we also produce a deep CMD of
unprecedented quality for the cluster which reveals a remarkable lack of main
sequence binaries, possibly pointing to a low primordial binary fraction.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611584 [pdf] - 86970
WIYN Open Cluster Study. XXVI. Improved kinematic membership and
spectroscopy of IC 2391
Submitted: 2006-11-17
[Abridged] Contex. Young open clusters provide important clues to the
interface between the main sequence and pre-main-sequence phases of stellar
evolution. The young and nearby open cluster IC 2391 is well-suited to studies
of these two evolutionary phases. Aims. We establish a bona fide set of cluster
members and then analyze this set in terms of binary frequency, projected
rotational velocities, [Fe/H], and lithium abundance. In the wake of the
Hipparcos distance controversy for the Pleiades, we compare the main-sequence
fitting distance modulus to the Hipparcos mean parallax for IC 2391. Results.
The proper-motion survey covers a 6 times larger sky area than the prior
targeted searches for cluster members in IC 2391. A total of 66 stars are
considered bona fide cluster members down to a mass equivalent to 0.5M_sun. A
quarter of them have been newly identified with many in the F2-K5 spectral
range, which is crucial for a main-sequence fit. We find a mean [Fe/H] value of
+0.06+/-0.06, when a solar abundance of log epsilon (Fe)=7.45 is adopted. The
main sequence fitting yields a distance modulus that is 0.19 mag larger than
that derived from Hipparcos parallaxes; thus this offset nearly has the size of
a similar offset found for the Pleiades. The Li abundance pattern is similar to
the earlier findings and is typical for a 40 Myr old open cluster.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510494 [pdf] - 76990
3D kinematics of white dwarfs from the SPY project II
Submitted: 2005-10-17
We present the kinematics of a sample of 398 DA white dwarfs from the SPY
project (ESO SN Ia Progenitor surveY) and discuss kinematic criteria for
distinguishing thin-disk, thick-disk, and halo populations. This is the largest
homogeneous sample of white dwarfs for which 3D space motions have been
determined. Since the percentage of old stars among white dwarfs is higher than
among main-sequence stars, they are presumably valuable tools in studies of old
populations, such as the halo and the thick disk. Radial velocities and
spectroscopic distances were combined with our measurements of proper motions
to derive 3D space motions. Galactic orbits were computed. Our kinematic
criteria for assigning population membership were deduced from a sample of F
and G stars, for which chemical criteria can be used to distinguish between a
thin-disk, a thick-disk and a halo star. Our kinematic population
classification scheme is based on the position in the U-V-velocity diagram, the
position in the Jz-eccentricity diagram, and the Galactic orbit. We combined
this with age information and found seven halo and 27 thick-disk white dwarfs
in this brightness limited sample. Correspondingly 2% of the white dwarfs
belong to the halo and 7% to the thick disk. The mass contribution of the
thick-disk white dwarfs is found to be substantial, but is insufficient to
account for the missing dark matter. (abbreviated)
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509202 [pdf] - 75784
The Multiwavelength Survey by Yale-Chile (MUSYC): Survey Design and Deep
Public UBVRIz' Images and Catalogs of the Extended Hubble Deep Field South
MUSYC Collaboration;
Gawiser, E.;
van Dokkum, P. G.;
Herrera, D.;
Maza, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Infante, L.;
Lira, P.;
Quadri, R.;
Toner, R.;
Treister, E.;
Urry, C. M.;
Altmann, M.;
Assef, R.;
Christlein, D.;
Coppi, P. S.;
Duran, M. F.;
Franx, M.;
Galaz, G.;
Huerta, L.;
Liu, C.;
Lopez, S.;
Mendez, R.;
Moore, D. C.;
Rubio, M.;
Ruiz, M. T.;
Toft, S.;
Yi, S. K.
Submitted: 2005-09-08
We present UBVRIz' optical images of the 0.32 square degree Extended Hubble
Deep Field South. This is one of four fields comprising the MUSYC survey, which
is optimized for the study of galaxies at z=3, AGN demographics, and Galactic
structure. We calculate corrected aperture photometry and its uncertainties and
find through tests that these provide a significant improvement upon standard
techniques. Our photometric catalog of 62968 objects is complete to a total
magnitude of R_AB=25. We select z=3 Lyman break galaxy (LBG) candidates from
their UVR colors and find a sky surface density of 1.4/sq. arcmin and an
angular correlation function w(theta) = 2.3+-1.0 theta^{-0.8}. (Abridged)
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507024 [pdf] - 74193
High resolution spectroscopy of bright subdwarf B stars - I. Radial
velocity variables
Submitted: 2005-07-01
Radial velocity curves for 15 bright subdwarf B binary systems have been
measured using high precision radial velocity measurements from high S/N
optical high-resolution spectra. In addition, two bright sdB stars are
discovered to be radial velocity variable but the period could not yet be
determined. The companions for all systems are unseen. The periods range from
about 0.18 days up to more than ten days. The radial velocity semi amplitudes
are found to lie between 15 and 130 km/s. Using the mass functions, the masses
of the unseen companions have been constrained to lower limits of 0.03 up to
0.55 M_sun, and most probable values of 0.03 up to 0.81 M_sun. The invisible
companions for three of our program stars are undoubtedly white dwarfs. In the
other cases they could be either white dwarfs or main sequence stars. For two
stars the secondaries could possibly be brown dwarfs. As expected, the orbits
are circular for most of the systems. However, for one third of the program
stars we find slightly eccentric orbits with small eccentricities of
e~0.02-0.06. This is the first time that non-circular orbits have been found in
sdB binaries. No correlation with the orbital period can be found.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507044 [pdf] - 74213
Searching for merger debris in the Galactic halo: Chemodynamical
evidence based on local blue HB stars
Submitted: 2005-07-01
We report on the discovery of a group of local A-type blue horizontal-branch
(HBA) stars moving in a prograde, comet-like orbit with very similar kinematics
and abundances. This serendipitously discovered group contains 5 or 6 local HBA
stars venturing very close to the Galactic centre; their [Fe/H] is around -1.7,
and they seem to present minimum scatter in at least Mg, Si, Ti, Fe, Al, and Cr
abundances. This ``Cometary Orbit Group'' (COG) was found while we were testing
a new method to detect the debris associated with the merger of smaller,
specific protogalactic entities into our galaxy. The method is primarily
intended to identify field HBA stars with similar kinematics and detailed,
multi-species abundance patterns as seen among members of a surviving remnant
(e.g., omega Centauri). Quite possibly, the COG is the remnant, on a highly
decayed orbit, of a merging event that took place in the relatively remote past
(i.e., at least one revolution ago).
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ex/0504037 [pdf] - 113362
Complete results for five years of GNO solar neutrino observations
GNO COLLABORATION;
Altmann, M.;
Balata, M.;
Belli, P.;
Bellotti, E.;
Bernabei, R.;
Burkert, E.;
Cattadori, C.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chiarini, M.;
Cribier, M.;
d'Angelo, S.;
Del Re, G.;
Ebert, K. H.;
Feilitzsch, F. v.;
Ferrari, N.;
Hampel, W.;
Hartmann, F. X.;
Henrich, E.;
Heusser, G.;
Kaether, F.;
Kiko, J.;
Kirsten, T.;
Lachenmaier, T.;
Lanfranchi, J.;
Laubenstein, M.;
Luetzenkirchen, K.;
Mayer, K.;
Moegel, P.;
Motta, D.;
Nisi, S.;
Oehm, J.;
Pandola, L.;
Petricca, F.;
Potzel, W.;
Richter, H.;
Schoenert, S.;
Wallenius, M.;
Wojcik, M.;
Zanotti, L.
Submitted: 2005-04-19
We report the complete GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring periods
GNO III, GNO II, and GNO I. The result for GNO III (last 15 solar runs) is
[54.3 + 9.9 - 9.3 (stat.)+- 2.3 (syst.)] SNU (1 sigma) or [54.3 + 10.2 - 9.6
(incl. syst.)] SNU (1 sigma) with errors combined. The GNO experiment is now
terminated after altogether 58 solar exposure runs that were performed between
May 20, 1998 and April 9, 2003. The combined result for GNO (I+II+III) is [62.9
+ 5.5 - 5.3 (stat.) +- 2.5 (syst.)] SNU (1 sigma) or [62.9 + 6.0 - 5.9] SNU (1
sigma) with errors combined in quadrature. Overall, gallium based solar
observations at LNGS (first in GALLEX, later in GNO) lasted from May 14, 1991
through April 9, 2003. The joint result from 123 runs in GNO and GALLEX is
[69.3 +- 5.5 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1 sigma). The distribution of the individual
run results is consistent with the hypothesis of a neutrino flux that is
constant in time. Implications from the data in particle- and astrophysics are
reiterated.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0412428 [pdf] - 69832
Kinematics of RHB stars to trace the structure of the galaxy
Submitted: 2004-12-16
Red horizontal-branch (RHB) stars have been selected from the HIPPARCOS
catalogue to investigate their kinematics and spatial distribution. HIPPARCOS
parallaxes, literature radial velocities and HIPPARCOS proper motions, together
with models for the gravitational potential of the Milky Way allow a
calculation of the actual velocity vectors and the orbits of the RHB stars. The
velocity characteristics are used to define a halo population sample (HPS) in
the collection of RHBs. The orbits lead statistically to an overall z-distance
probability distribution, showing that the RHBs exhibit two populations, a disk
one having a scale height of h_disk ~0.6 kpc and a halo one of ~4 kpc. We have
investigated the influence on our results of parallax accuracy and of a
demarcation line in the HRD between the RHB and the red-giant (RG) star region.
Neither of them show marked effects. We have performed the orbit analysis using
the potential model of Allen & Santillan as well as of Dehnen & Binney. The
results differ only slightly for the disk population, showing that these
potential models are not a critical part of such orbit investigations. RHB
scale height values are smaller than those found earlier for sdB stars, most
likely because the samples of stars used had different spatial distributions a
priori. The data do not allow us to specify a trend in the kinematic behaviour
of star types along the horizontal branch.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0412386 [pdf] - 69790
Searching for White and Brown Dwarfs in the frame of the MUSYC/CYDER
survey
Submitted: 2004-12-15
MUSYC (MUltiwavelength Survey by Yale and Chile), and its predecessor, the
CYDER (Cal'an Yale Deep Extragalactic Research) survey are both deep
multiwavelength surveys mainly aiming at extragalactic issues; however they
were both designed with a strong Galactic component in mind. Therefore they
consist not only of multipassband imaging (UBVRIzJK) and wide field multi
object spectroscopy - it is also foreseen to create a multi-epoch dataset, thus
allowing proper motions to be derived using data of 1 and 4-5 years baseline.
This enables us to identify fast moving objects, and derive tangential
velocities of nearby and intrinsically faint objects, such as White Dwarfs
(especially cool WDs) and Brown Dwarfs (BDs). For the former, we will be able
to study the faint end of the halo-field luminosity function and determine the
fraction of baryonic dark matter consisting of WDs. We will be able to put
constraints on the volume density of BDs, and determine whether this density
actually meets expectations. Here we give a report of work in progress.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0410430 [pdf] - 68279
3D-Kinematics of White Dwarfs from the SPY-Project
Submitted: 2004-10-19
We present kinematics of a sample of 398 DA white dwarfs from the SPY project
(ESO SN Ia Progenitor surveY) and discuss kinematic criteria for a distinction
of thin disk, thick disk, and halo populations. This is the largest homogeneous
sample of white dwarfs for which 3D space motions have been determined. Radial
velocities and spectroscopic distances obtained by the SPY project are combined
with our measurements of proper motions to derive 3D space motions. Galactic
orbits and further kinematic parameters are computed. Our kinematic criteria
for assigning population membership are deduced from a sample of F and G stars
taken from the literature for which chemical criteria can be used to
distinguish between thin disk, thick disk and halo. Our kinematic population
classification scheme is based on the position in the U-V-velocity diagram, the
position in the J_z-eccentricity diagram and the Galactic orbit. We combine
this with age estimates and find seven halo and 23 thick disk white dwarfs.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0410230 [pdf] - 1456395
The mass of the sdB primary of the binary HS 2333+3927
Heber, U.;
Drechsel, H.;
Karl, C.;
Østensen, R.;
Folkes, S.;
Napiwotzki, R.;
Altmann, M.;
Cordes, O.;
Solheim, J. -E.;
Voss, B.;
Koester, D.
Submitted: 2004-10-08
Short period sdB binaries with cool companions are crucial to understand
pre-CV evolution, because they will evolve into cataclysmic variables, when the
sdB will have left the extended horizontal branch. Recently we discovered the
sixth such system, HS 2333+3927, consisting of an sdB star and an M dwarf
(period: 0.172 d) with a very strong reflection effect, but no eclipses. The
reflection is stronger than in any of the other similar systems which renders a
quantitative spectral analysis very difficult because the Balmer line profiles
may be disturbed by the reflected light. A spectroscopic analysis results in
Teff = 36500 K, log g = 5.70, and log (n_He/n_H) = -2.15. Mass-radius relations
were derived from the results of the analysis of light and radial-velocity
curves. Comparison with the mass-radius relation derived from the surface
gravity of the sdB star favours a rather low mass of 0.38 Msun for the primary.
The mass of the companion is 0.29 M_sun. HS 2333+3927 is the only known sdB+dM
system with a period above the CV period gap.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310568 [pdf] - 60231
Studying the populations of our Galaxy using the kinematics of sdB stars
Submitted: 2003-10-20
We have analysed the kinematics of a sample of 114 hot subdwarf stars, for
2/3 of which we present new proper motions, spectroscopic and photometric data.
The vast majority of the stars show a kinematic behaviour that is similar to
that of Thick Disk stars. Some stars have velocities rather fitting to solar,
i.e. Thin Disk, kinematics. 16 objects have orbital velocities which differ
considerably from those of Disk stars. These are members of the Galactic Halo.
We analysed the velocity dispersions and calculated orbits. Most stars feature
orbits with disk character (eccentricity <= 0.5), a few reach far above the
Galactic plane and have very eccentric orbits (ecc >= 0.7). The intermediate
eccentricity range is poorly populated. This indicates that the (Thick) Disk
and the Halo are kinematically disjunct. Plotting a histogram of the orbit data
points along z leads to the z-distance probability distribution of the star;
doing this for all stars leads to the z-distance probability distribution of
the sample. The logarithmic histogram shows two slopes, each representing the
scale height of a population. The disk component has a scale height of 0.9
(0.1) kpc, which is consistent with earlier results and is similar to that of
the Thick Disk. The other slope represents a component with a scale height ~7
kpc, a much flatter gradient than for the disk component. This shows that the
vast majority of the sdBs are Disk stars, but a Halo minority is present, too.
The kinematic history and population membership of the sdB stars on the whole
is different from that of the cooler HBA stars, which are predominantly or even
exclusively Halo objects. This leads to the question, whether the Halo sdB
stars are of similar origin as the HBAs, or whether their kinematical behaviour
possibly represents another origin, such as infalling stellar aggregates.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301467 [pdf] - 54438
3D kinematics of white dwarfs from the SPY project
Submitted: 2003-01-23
We present kinematics of a sample of 107 DA white dwarfs from the SPY project
and discuss kinematic criteria for a distinction of thin disk, thick disk, and
halo populations. This is the first homogeneous sample of white dwarfs for
which 3D space motions have been determined. Studies of white dwarf kinematics
can help determine the fraction of the total mass of our Galaxy contained in
the form of thick disk and halo white dwarfs. Radial velocities and
spectroscopic distances obtained by the SPY project are combined with our
measurements of proper motions to derive 3D space motions. Galactic orbits and
further kinematic parameters are computed. Candidates for thick disk and halo
members are selected in a first step from the classical U-V-velocity diagram.
Our final assignment of population membership is based on orbits and position
in the angular-momentum-eccentricity diagram. We find four halo and twelve
thick disk white dwarfs.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0106314 [pdf] - 43110
Results and plans of the CRESST dark matter search
Altmann, M.;
Angloher, G.;
Bruckmayer, M.;
Bucci, C.;
Cooper, S.;
Cozzini, C.;
DiStefano, P.;
von Feilitzsch, F.;
Frank, T.;
Hauff, D.;
Jagemann, Th.;
Jochum, J.;
Keeling, R.;
Kraus, H.;
Macallister, J.;
Proebst, F.;
Ramachers, Y.;
Schnagl, J.;
Seidel, W.;
Sergeyev, I.;
Stark, M.;
Stodolsky, L.;
Wulandari, H.
Submitted: 2001-06-18
Data taken by CRESST in 2000 with a cryogenic detector system based on 262 g
sapphire crystals is used to place limits on WIMP dark matter in the Galactic
Halo. The detector is especially sensitive for low-mass WIMPS with
spin-dependent cross sections and improves on existing limits in this region.
CRESST is now preparing for a second phase, which will use a 10 kg detector
consisting of 300 g CaWO4 crystals with simultaneous detection of phonons and
scintillation light to reduce background.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ex/0006034 [pdf] - 113332
GNO Solar Neutrino Observations: Results for GNOI
GNO Collaboration;
Altmann, M.;
Balata, M.;
Belli, P.;
Bellotti, E.;
Bernabei, R.;
Burkert, E.;
Cattadori, C.;
Cerichelli, G.;
Chiarini, M.;
Cribier, M.;
d'Angelo, S.;
Del Re, G.;
Ebert, K. H.;
Feilitzsch, F. v.;
Ferrari, N.;
Hampel, W.;
Handt, J.;
Henrich, E.;
Heusser, G.;
Kiko, J.;
Kirsten, T.;
Lachenmaier, T.;
Lanfranchi, J.;
Laubenstein, M.;
Motta, D.;
Rau, W.;
Richter, H.;
Waenninger, S.;
Wojcik, M.;
Zanotti, L.
Submitted: 2000-06-29
We report the first GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring period GNOI,
solar exposure time May 20, 1998 till January 12, 2000. In the present
analysis, counting results for solar runs SR1 - SR19 were used till April 4,
2000. With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the
GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or
[65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined. This may be
compared to the result for Gallex(I-IV), which is [77.5 +7.6 -7.8 (incl.
syst.)] SNU (1sigma). A combined result from both GNOI and Gallex(I-IV)
together is [74.1 + 6.7 -6.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma).
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0006060 [pdf] - 36440
The stars near the centre of supergiant shell LMC4: Further constraints
on triggering scenarios
Submitted: 2000-06-05
The huge supergiant shell (SGS) LMC4, next to the giant HII region 30 Doradus
the second most impressive feature of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), has
been the subject of many studies and was used to test various models of star
forming mechanisms. In this paper we present a B, V photometry of the very
centre of this SGS. The new data yield an age of 11(2)Myr and a colour excess
E(B-V) = 0.10(3)mag. Additionally, the two clusters near the geometric centre
are too old to be related to the formation of LMC4: HS343 being ~0.1Gyr and
KMHK1000 being ~0.3Gyr of age. This and existing photometries support that the
young stellar population covering the entire inner region is nearly coeval. We
compare these findings with predictions of models proposed for the creation
mechanism of SGSs. We conclude that the large-scale trigger, necessary to
explain the observations, comes from hydrodynamic interaction of the galactic
halo with gas in the leading edge of the moving LMC.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0003327 [pdf] - 35201
Photometric and kinematic studies of open star clusters. II. NGC 1960 (M
36) and NGC 2194
Submitted: 2000-03-22
We present CCD photometry and proper motion studies of the two open star
clusters NGC 1960 (M 36) and NGC 2194. Fitting isochrones to the colour
magnitude diagrams, for NGC 1960 we found an age of t=16 Myr and a distance of
roughly d=1300 pc and for NGC 2194 t=550 Myr and d=2900 pc, respectively. We
combined membership determination by proper motions and statistical field star
subtraction to derive the initial mass function of the clusters and found
slopes of Gamma=-1.23 +/- 0.17 for NGC 1960 and Gamma=-1.33 +/- 0.29 for NGC
2194. Compared to other IMF studies of the intermediate mass range, these
values indicate shallow mass functions.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0002221 [pdf] - 34564
Long-term photometry of the Wolf-Rayet stars WR 137, WR 140, WR 148, and
WR 153
Submitted: 2000-02-10
In 1991, a long term UBV-photometry campaign of four Wolf-Rayet stars was
started using the 60 cm telescope of the National Astronomical Observatory
Rozhen, Bulgaria. Here we report on our observational results and discuss the
light variations. The star WR 137 showed only random light variations, which
are probably due to dynamical wind instabilities but not to eclipses. WR 140
featured a dip in the light curve, the amplitude increasing towards shorter
wavelengths. The probable cause is electron and Rayleigh scattering when the
star was eclipsed by a dust envelope. In the case of WR 148 we found a period
of 4.3 days and significant scatter in the light curves. Additionally there
seems to be a long term variation with a period of 4 years. Our photometry of
WR 153 is consistent with the quadruple model for this star.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9911456 [pdf] - 109584
Kinematical trends among the field horizontal branch stars
Submitted: 1999-11-24
Field Horizontal branch (HB) stars can be used as tracers for the study of
early stages of the evolution of our galaxy. Since the age of individual HB
stars is not known a priori, we have studied the kinematics of a sample of
field HB stars measured with Hipparcos to look for signs of age and population
nature. We found that the kinematics of the HBA stars is very different from
that of the sdB/O stars. The HBAs have low, sometimes negative, orbital
velocities and feature orbits with large eccentricities, often venturing far
above the galactic plane. In contrast, the sdB/O stars show disk-like orbital
characteristics. The HBB stars (T_eff > 10,000 K) show kinematics similar to
that of the sdB/Os.
In order to see if there is a trend among the HB stars in their kinematics,
we investigated also RR Lyrae stars measured with Hipparcos and found a mixed
kinematical behaviour, already known from previous studies.
Since the atmospheres of most types of HB stars do not reflect original
metallicities any more the kinematics is the only aspect left to study their
origin and population membership. Thus, the clear trend found in kinematics of
stars along the HB, which is also a sequence in stellar mass, shows that the
different kinds of field HB stars arose from stars having different origins.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9801320 [pdf] - 100169
Proceedings "Neutrino Astrophysics"
Submitted: 1998-01-30
Collection of "Extended Abstracts" of talks presented at the SFB-375 workshop
NEUTRINO ASTROPHYSICS, Ringberg Castle, Tegernsee, Germany, 20-24 Oct. 1997.
Topics include Solar Neutrinos, Supernovae, Gamma-Ray Bursts, High-Energy
Neutrinos (atmospheric, astrophysical), Cosmology, and Future Prospects. The
focus is on astrophysical and experimental/observational aspects of
astrophysical neutrinos while particle theory and neutrino laboratory
experiments are not covered.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708184 [pdf] - 98362
Hot subdwarf stars - galactic orbits and distribution perpendicular to
the plane
Submitted: 1997-08-20
The spatial distribution and the population nature of subdwarf B type stars
in the galaxy is investigated based on the kinematics of these stars. The
orbits of 41 stars have been calculated using a galactic mass model. These are
well behaved and 10 stars reach to |z| > 2 kpc. Many orbits are very eccentric,
reaching in to just 2 kpc from the galactic centre, or veering out to beyond 20
kpc. None of the stars can be identified uniquely as classical Population II
objects. The average eccentricity ECC of the orbits of our sample is 0.24, the
average normalised z-extent NZE of the orbits is 0.16, and the asymmetric drift
of our sample is -36 km s^-1. The distribution in z shows a relative minimum
near z=0 pc and has maxima near z=300 pc. This reflects the smaller probability
to find the stars IN the disk than away from the disk.