Normalized to: Alsip, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.06584 [pdf] - 1224190
On the difference of torus geometry between hidden and non-hidden broad
line active galactic nuclei
Ichikawa, Kohei;
Packham, Christopher;
Almeida, Cristina Ramos;
Ramos, Andres Asensio;
Alonso-Herrero, Almudena;
Gonzalez-Martin, Omaira;
Lopez-Rodriguez, Enrique;
Ueda, Yoshihiro;
Diaz-Santos, Tanio;
Elitzur, Moshe;
Hoenig, Sebastian F.;
Imanishi, Masatoshi;
Levenson, Nancy A.;
Mason, Rachel E.;
Perlman, Eric S.;
Alsip, Crystal D.
Submitted: 2015-01-26
We present results from the fitting of infrared (IR) spectral energy
distributions of 21 active galactic nuclei (AGN) with clumpy torus models. We
compiled high spatial resolution ($\sim 0.3$--$0.7$ arcsec) mid-IR $N$-band
spectroscopy, $Q$-band imaging and nuclear near- and mid-IR photometry from the
literature. Combining these nuclear near- and mid-IR observations, far-IR
photometry and clumpy torus models, enables us to put constraints on the torus
properties and geometry. We divide the sample into three types according to the
broad line region (BLR) properties; type-1s, type-2s with scattered or hidden
broad line region (HBLR) previously observed, and type-2s without any published
HBLR signature (NHBLR). Comparing the torus model parameters gives us the first
quantitative torus geometrical view for each subgroup. We find that NHBLR AGN
have smaller torus opening angles and larger covering factors than those of
HBLR AGN. This suggests that the chance to observe scattered (polarized) flux
from the BLR in NHBLR could be reduced by the dual effects of (a) less
scattering medium due to the reduced scattering volume given the small torus
opening angle and (b) the increased torus obscuration between the observer and
the scattering region. These effects give a reasonable explanation for the lack
of observed HBLR in some type-2 AGN.