Normalized to: Almualla, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14756 [pdf] - 2122742
Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the second
part of the Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's third observing run: lessons
learned for future follow-up observations
Coughlin, Michael W.;
Dietrich, Tim;
Antier, Sarah;
Almualla, Mouza;
Anand, Shreya;
Bulla, Mattia;
Foucart, Francois;
Guessoum, Nidhal;
Hotokezaka, Kenta;
Kumar, Vishwesh;
Raaijmakers, Geert;
Nissanke, Samaya
Submitted: 2020-06-25
Joint multi-messenger observations with gravitational waves and
electromagnetic data offer new insights into the astrophysical studies of
compact objects. The third Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo observing run began
on April 1, 2019; during the eleven months of observation, there have been 14
compact binary systems candidates for which at least one component is
potentially a neutron star. Although intensive follow-up campaigns involving
tens of ground and space-based observatories searched for counterparts, no
electromagnetic counterpart has been detected. Following on a previous study of
the first six months of the campaign, we present in this paper the next five
months of the campaign from October 2019 to March 2020. We highlight two
neutron star - black hole candidates (S191205ah, S200105ae), two binary neutron
star candidates (S191213g and S200213t) and a binary merger with a possible
neutron star and a "MassGap" component, S200115j. Assuming that the
gravitational-wave candidates are of astrophysical origin and their location
was covered by optical telescopes, we derive possible constraints on the matter
ejected during the events based on the non-detection of counterparts. We find
that the follow-up observations during the second half of the third observing
run did not meet the necessary sensitivity to constrain the source properties
of the potential gravitational-wave candidate. Consequently, we suggest that
different strategies have to be used to allow a better usage of the available
telescope time. We examine different choices for follow-up surveys to optimize
sky localization coverage vs.\ observational depth to understand the likelihood
of counterpart detection.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.04277 [pdf] - 2129285
GRANDMA Observations of Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's Third
Observational Campaign
Antier, S.;
Agayeva, S.;
Almualla, M.;
Awiphan, S.;
Baransky, A.;
Barynova, K.;
Beradze, S.;
Blažek, M.;
Boer, M.;
Burkhonov, O.;
Christensen, N.;
Coleiro, A.;
Corre, D.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Crisp, H.;
Dietrich, T.;
Ducoin, J. -G.;
Duverne, P. -A.;
Marchal-Duval, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Gokuldass, P.;
Eggenstein, H. B.;
Eymar, L.;
Hello, P.;
Howell, E. J.;
Ismailov, N.;
Kann, D. A.;
Karpov, S.;
Klotz, A.;
Kochiashvili, N.;
Lachaud, C.;
Leroy, N.;
Lin, W. L.;
Li, W. X.;
Mašek, M.;
Mo, J.;
Menard, R.;
Morris, D.;
Noysena, K.;
Orange, N. B.;
Prouza, M.;
Rattanamala, R.;
Sadibekova, T.;
Saint-Gelais, D.;
Serrau, M.;
Simon, A.;
Stachie, C.;
Thöne, C. C.;
Tillayev, Y.;
Turpin, D.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vasylenko, V.;
Vidadi, Z.;
Was, M.;
Wang, X. F.;
Zhang, J. J.;
Zhang, T. M.;
Zhang, X. H.
Submitted: 2020-04-08, last modified: 2020-06-23
GRANDMA is a network of 25 telescopes of different sizes, including both
photometric and spectroscopic facilities. The network aims to coordinate
follow-up observations of gravitational-wave candidate alerts, especially those
with large localisation uncertainties, to reduce the delay between the initial
detection and the optical confirmation. In this paper, we detail GRANDMA's
observational performance during Advanced LIGO/Advanced Virgo Observing Run 3
(O3), focusing on the second part of O3; this includes summary statistics
pertaining to coverage and possible astrophysical origin of the candidates. To
do so, we quantify our observation efficiency in terms of delay between
gravitational-wave candidate trigger time, observations, and the total
coverage. Using an optimised and robust coordination system, GRANDMA
followed-up about 90 % of the gravitational-wave candidate alerts, i.e. 49 out
of 56 candidates. This led to coverage of over 9000 deg2 during O3. The delay
between the gravitational-wave candidate trigger and the first observation was
below 1.5 hour for 50 % of the alerts. We did not detect any electromagnetic
counterparts to the gravitational-wave candidates during O3, likely due to the
very large localisation areas (on average thousands of degrees squares) and
relatively large distance of the candidates (above 200 Mpc for 60 % of BNS
candidates). We derive constraints on potential kilonova properties for two
potential binary neutron star coalescences (GW190425 and S200213t), assuming
that the events' locations were imaged.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.11306 [pdf] - 2119138
Kilonova Luminosity Function Constraints based on Zwicky Transient
Facility Searches for 13 Neutron Star Mergers
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Anand, Shreya;
Ahumada, Tomas;
Stein, Robert;
Carracedo, Ana Sagues;
Andreoni, Igor;
Coughlin, Michael W.;
Singer, Leo P.;
Kool, Erik C.;
De, Kishalay;
Kumar, Harsh;
AlMualla, Mouza;
Yao, Yuhan;
Bulla, Mattia;
Dobie, Dougal;
Reusch, Simeon;
Perley, Daniel A.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
Bhalerao, Varun;
Kaplan, David L.;
Sollerman, Jesper;
Goobar, Ariel;
Copperwheat, Christopher M.;
Bellm, Eric C.;
Anupama, G. C.;
Corsi, Alessandra;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Agudo, Ivan;
Bagdasaryan, Ashot;
Barway, Sudhanshu;
Belicki, Justin;
Bloom, Joshua S.;
Bolin, Bryce;
Buckley, David A. H.;
Burdge, Kevin B.;
Burruss, Rick;
Caballero-Garcıa, Maria D.;
Cannella, Chris;
Castro-Tirado, Alberto J.;
Cook, David O.;
Cooke, Jeff;
Cunningham, Virginia;
Dahiwale, Aishwarya;
Deshmukh, Kunal;
Dichiara, Simone;
Duev, Dmitry A.;
Dutta, Anirban;
Feeney, Michael;
Franckowiak, Anna;
Frederick, Sara;
Fremling, Christoffer;
Gal-Yam, Avishay;
Gatkine, Pradip;
Ghosh, Shaon;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Golkhou, V. Zach;
Graham, Matthew J.;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Hankins, Matthew J.;
Helou, George;
Hu, Youdong;
Ip, Wing-Huen;
Jaodand, Amruta;
Karambelkar, Viraj;
Kong, Albert K. H.;
Kowalski, Marek;
Khandagale, Maitreya;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Kumar, Brajesh;
Laher, Russ R.;
Li, K. L.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Masci, Frank J.;
Miller, Adam A.;
Mogotsi, Moses;
Mohite, Siddharth;
Mooley, Kunal;
Mroz, Przemek;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Ngeow, Chow-Choong;
Oates, Samantha R.;
Patil, Atharva Sunil;
Pandey, Shashi B.;
Pavana, M.;
Pian, Elena;
Riddle, Reed;
Sanchez-Ramırez, Ruben;
Sharma, Yashvi;
Singh, Avinash;
Smith, Roger;
Soumagnac, Maayane T.;
Taggart, Kirsty;
Tan, Hanjie;
Tzanidakis, Anastasios;
Troja, Eleonora;
Valeev, Azamat F.;
Walters, Richard;
Waratkar, Gaurav;
Webb, Sara;
Yu, Po-Chieh;
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
Zhou, Rongpu;
Zolkower, Jeffry
Submitted: 2020-06-19
We present a systematic search for optical counterparts to 13 gravitational
wave (GW) triggers involving at least one neutron star during LIGO/Virgo's
third observing run. We searched binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star
black hole (NSBH) merger localizations with the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF)
and undertook follow-up with the Global Relay of Observatories Watching
Transients Happen (GROWTH) collaboration. The GW triggers had a median
localization of 4480 deg^2, median distance of 267 Mpc and false alarm rates
ranging from 1.5 to 1e-25 per yr. The ZTF coverage had a median enclosed
probability of 39%, median depth of 20.8mag, and median response time of 1.5
hr. The O3 follow-up by the GROWTH team comprised 340 UVOIR photometric points,
64 OIR spectra, and 3 radio. We find no promising kilonova
(radioactivity-powered counterpart) and we convert the upper limits to
constrain the underlying kilonova luminosity function. Assuming that all
kilonovae are at least as luminous as GW170817 at discovery (-16.1mag), we
calculate our joint probability of detecting zero kilonovae is only 4.2%. If we
assume that all kilonovae are brighter than -16.6mag (extrapolated peak
magnitude of GW170817) and fade at 1 mag/day (similar to GW170817), the joint
probability of zero detections is 7%. If we separate the NSBH and BNS
populations, the joint probability of zero detections, assuming all kilonovae
are brighter than -16.6mag, is 9.7% for NSBH and 7.9% for BNS mergers.
Moreover, <57% (<89%) of putative kilonovae could be brighter than -16.6mag
assuming flat (fading) evolution, at 90% confidence. If we further account for
the online terrestrial probability for each GW trigger, we find that <68% of
putative kilonovae could be brighter than -16.6mag. Comparing to model grids,
we find that some kilonovae must have Mej < 0.03 Msun or Xlan>1e-4 or phi>30deg
to be consistent with our limits. (Abridged)
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.09718 [pdf] - 2109999
Dynamic Scheduling: Target of Opportunity Observations of Gravitational
Wave Events
Submitted: 2020-03-21, last modified: 2020-05-27
The simultaneous detection of electromagnetic and gravitational waves from
the coalescence of two neutron stars (GW170817 and GRB170817A) has ushered in a
new era of "multi-messenger" astronomy, with electromagnetic detections
spanning from gamma to radio. This great opportunity for new scientific
investigations raises the issue of how the available multi-messenger tools can
best be integrated to constitute a powerful method to study the transient
universe in particular. To facilitate the classification of possible optical
counterparts to gravitational-wave events, it is important to optimize the
scheduling of observations and the filtering of transients, both key elements
of the follow-up process. In this work, we describe the existing workflow
whereby telescope networks such as GRANDMA and GROWTH are currently scheduled;
we then present modifications we have developed for the scheduling process
specifically, so as to face the relevant challenges that have appeared during
the latest observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. We address issues
with scheduling more than one epoch for multiple fields within a skymap,
especially for large and disjointed localizations. This is done in two ways: by
optimizing the maximum number of fields that can be scheduled, and by splitting
up the lobes within the skymap by right ascension to be scheduled individually.
In addition, we implement the ability to take previously observed fields into
consideration when rescheduling. We show the improvements that these
modifications produce in making the search for optical counterparts more
efficient, and we point to areas needing further improvement.