Normalized to: Almaraz, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.02616 [pdf] - 2091649
Nonlinear structure formation in Bound Dark Energy
Submitted: 2019-07-04, last modified: 2020-05-07
We study nonlinear structure formation in the Bound Dark Energy model (BDE),
where dark energy (DE) corresponds to a light scalar meson particle $\phi$
dynamically formed at a condensation energy scale $\Lambda_c$. The evolution of
this dark-energy meson is determined by the potential
$V(\phi)=\Lambda_c^{4+2/3}\phi^{-2/3}$, with a distinguishing phenomenology
from other quintessence scenarios. Particularly, the expansion rate of the
universe is affected not only at late times, but also when the condensation of
$\phi$ occurs, which in linear theory leads to an enhancement (with respect to
standard $\Lambda$CDM) of matter perturbations on small scales. We study how
much of this signature is still present at late times as well as the properties
of dark matter halos in the nonlinear regime through N-body simulations. Our
results show that nonlinear corrections wash out this feature from the matter
power spectrum even before DE becomes dominant. There is, however, a small but
clear suppression of the BDE spectrum of $2\%$ today on the largest scales due
to the distinct late-time dynamics of DE. The differences on the clustering
power between BDE and $\Lambda$CDM are reflected in the halo mass function,
where small halos are more abundant in BDE as opposed to large heavy
structures, whose formation is delayed because of the expansion history of the
universe. This result is well captured by the semi-analytical Sheth-Tormen
formula. However, despite these differences, the halo concentration parameter
is essentially the same in both models, which suggest that clustering inside
the halos decouple from the general expansion once the halos form.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.09522 [pdf] - 1968979
Imprint of a Steep Equation of State in the growth of structure
Submitted: 2019-06-22
We study the cosmological properties of a dynamical of dark energy (DE)
component determined by a Steep Equation of State (SEoS)
$w(z)=w_0+w_i\frac{(z/z_T)^q}{1+(z/z_T)^q}$. The SEoS has a transition at $z_T$
between two pivotal values ($w_i, w_0$) which can be taken as an early time and
present day values of $w$ and the steepness is given by $q$. We describe the
impact of this dynamical DE at background and perturbative level. The steepness
of the transition has a better cosmological fit than a conventional CPL model
with $w=w_0+w_a(1-a)$. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of steepness of the
transition in the growth of matter perturbations and structure formation. This
is manifest in the linear matter power spectrum, $P(k)$, the logarithmic growth
function, $f\sigma_8(z)$, and the differential mass function $dn/d\log M(z=0)$.
The differences in these last three quantities is at a percent-level using the
same cosmological baseline parameters in our SEoS and a $\Lambda CDM$ model.
However, we find an increase in the power spectrum, producing a bump at
$k\approx k_T$ with $k_T\equiv a_TH(a_T)$ the mode associated to the time of
the steep transition ($a_T = 1/(1+z_T)$). Different dynamics of DE lead to a
different amount of DM at present time which has an impact in Power Spectrum
and accordingly in structure formation.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.01133 [pdf] - 1882472
Bound Dark Energy: towards understanding the nature of the Dark Energy
Submitted: 2018-12-03
We present a complete analysis of the observational constraints and
cosmological implications of our Bound Dark Energy (BDE) model aimed to explain
the late-time cosmic acceleration of the universe. BDE is derived from particle
physics and corresponds to the lightest meson field $\phi$ dynamically formed
at low energies due to the strong gauge coupling constant. The evolution of the
dark energy is determined by the scalar potential
$V(\phi)=\Lambda_c^{4+2/3}\phi^{-2/3}$ arising from non-perturbative effects at
a condensation scale $\Lambda_c$ and scale factor $a_c$, related each other by
$a_c\Lambda_c/\mathrm{eV}=1.0934\times 10^{-4}$. We present the full background
and perturbation evolution at a linear level. Using current observational data,
we obtain the constraints $a_c=(2.48 \pm 0.02)\times10^{-6}$ and
$\Lambda_c=(44.09 \pm 0.28) \textrm{ eV}$, which is in complete agreement with
our theoretical prediction $\Lambda_c^{th}=34^{+16}_{-11}\textrm{ eV}$. The
bounds on the equation of state today, the dark energy density and the
expansion rate are $w_\mathrm{BDE 0}=-0.929\pm 0.007$,
$\Omega_\mathrm{BDE0}=0.696\pm0.007$ and $H_0=67.82\pm 0.05$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc,
respectively. Even though the constraints on the six Planck base parameters are
consistent at the 1$\sigma$ level between BDE and the concordance $\Lambda$CDM
model, BDE improves the likelihood ratio by 2.1 of the Baryon Acoustic
Oscillations (BAO) measurements with respect to $\Lambda$CDM and has an
equivalent fit for type Ia supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background data.
We present the constraints on the different cosmological parameters, and
particularly we show the tension between BDE and $\Lambda$CDM in the BAO
distance ratio $r_\mathrm{BAO}$ vs $H_\mathrm{0}$ and the growth index $\gamma$
at different redshifts, as well as the dark matter density at present time
$\Omega_ch^2$ vs $H_0$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.01510 [pdf] - 1771538
Testing the nature of Dark Energy with Precision Cosmological
constraints
Submitted: 2018-05-03
We present a Dark Energy (DE) model with a sound derivation as a natural
extension of the Standard Model of particle physics with no free parameters and
an excellent fit with current cosmological data improving by 21% the
$\Lambda$CDM fit of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) measurements,
specially designed to determine the dynamics of DE. DE corresponds to the
lightest bound state scalar particle $\phi$ with a potential
$V=\Lambda_c^{4+2/3}\phi^{-2/3}$ dynamically formed at the condensation energy
scale $\Lambda_c$ and scale factor $a_c$. The value of $\Lambda_c$, the
exponent $n=2/3$, and the initial conditions of $\phi$ are all derived
quantities. We obtain an exact constraint
$a_c\Lambda_c/\textrm{eV}=1.0939\times 10^{-4}$ and a theoretical prediction
$\Lambda_c=34 ^{+16}_{-11} \textrm{ eV}$, consistent with the best fit
$\Lambda_c=44.08\pm 0.27 \textrm{ eV}$. We test our model constraint on
$a_c\Lambda_c$ by allowing $a_c$ and $\Lambda_c$ to vary independently and
remarkably our prediction has a relative difference of only 0.2% with the best
fit value. Unlike a cosmological constant $\Lambda$, our DE model predicts the
amount of DE and leaves detectable cosmological imprints at different times and
scales at a background and perturbation level.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.6034 [pdf] - 504942
On the sensitivity of the HAWC observatory to gamma-ray bursts
HAWC collaboration;
Abeysekara, A. U.;
Aguilar, J. A.;
Aguilar, S.;
Alfaro, R.;
Almaraz, E.;
Álvarez, C.;
Álvarez-Romero, J. de D.;
Álvarez, M.;
Arceo, R.;
Arteaga-Velázquez, J. C.;
Badillo, C.;
Barber, A.;
Baughman, B. M.;
Bautista-Elivar, N.;
Belmont, E.;
Benítez, E.;
BenZvi, S. Y.;
Berley, D.;
Bernal, A.;
Bonamente, E.;
Braun, J.;
Caballero-Lopez, R.;
Cabrera, I.;
Carramiñana, A.;
Carrasco, L.;
Castillo, M.;
Chambers, L.;
Conde, R.;
Condreay, P.;
Cotti, U.;
Cotzomi, J.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
de la Fuente, E.;
De León, C.;
Delay, S.;
Delepine, D.;
DeYoung, T.;
Diaz, L.;
Diaz-Cruz, L.;
Dingus, B. L.;
Duvernois, M. A.;
Edmunds, D.;
Ellsworth, R. W.;
Fick, B.;
Fiorino, D. W.;
Flandes, A.;
Fraija, N. I.;
Galindo, A.;
García-Luna, J. L.;
García-Torales, G.;
Garfias, F.;
González, L. X.;
González, M. M.;
Goodman, J. A.;
Grabski, V.;
Gussert, M.;
Guzmán-Ceron, C.;
Hampel-Arias, Z.;
Harris, T.;
Hays, E.;
Hernandez-Cervantes, L.;
Hüntemeyer, P. H.;
Imran, A.;
Iriarte, A.;
Jimenez, J. J.;
Karn, P.;
Kelley-Hoskins, N.;
Kieda, D.;
Langarica, R.;
Lara, A.;
Lauer, R.;
Lee, W. H.;
Linares, E. C.;
Linnemann, J. T.;
Longo, M.;
Luna-García, R.;
Martínez, H.;
Martínez, J.;
Martínez, L. A.;
Martínez, O.;
Martínez-Castro, J.;
Martos, M.;
Matthews, J.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mendoza-Torres, J. E.;
Miranda-Romagnoli, P. A.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moreno, E.;
Mostafa, M.;
Napsuciale, M.;
Nava, J.;
Nellen, L.;
Newbold, M.;
Noriega-Papaqui, R.;
Oceguera-Becerra, T.;
Tapia, A. Olmos;
Orozco, V.;
Pérez, V.;
Pérez-Pérez, E. G.;
Perkins, J. S.;
Pretz, J.;
Ramirez, C.;
Ramírez, I.;
Rebello, D.;
Rentería, A.;
Reyes, J.;
Rosa-González, D.;
Rosado, A.;
Ryan, J. M.;
Sacahui, J. R.;
Salazar, H.;
Salesa, F.;
Sandoval, A.;
Santos, E.;
Schneider, M.;
Shoup, A.;
Silich, S.;
Sinnis, G.;
Smith, A. J.;
Sparks, K.;
Springer, W.;
Suárez, F.;
Suarez, N.;
Taboada, I.;
Tellez, A. F.;
Tenorio-Tagle, G.;
Tepe, A.;
Toale, P. A.;
Tollefson, K.;
Torres, I.;
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Valdes-Galicia, J.;
Vanegas, P.;
Vasileiou, V.;
Vázquez, O.;
Vázquez, X.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Wall, W.;
Walters, J. S.;
Warner, D.;
Westerhoff, S.;
Wisher, I. G.;
Wood, J.;
Yodh, G. B.;
Zaborov, D.;
Zepeda, A.
Submitted: 2011-08-30, last modified: 2011-12-19
We present the sensitivity of HAWC to Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs). HAWC is a very
high-energy gamma-ray observatory currently under construction in Mexico at an
altitude of 4100 m. It will observe atmospheric air showers via the water
Cherenkov method. HAWC will consist of 300 large water tanks instrumented with
4 photomultipliers each. HAWC has two data acquisition (DAQ) systems. The main
DAQ system reads out coincident signals in the tanks and reconstructs the
direction and energy of individual atmospheric showers. The scaler DAQ counts
the hits in each photomultiplier tube (PMT) in the detector and searches for a
statistical excess over the noise of all PMTs. We show that HAWC has a
realistic opportunity to observe the high-energy power law components of GRBs
that extend at least up to 30 GeV, as it has been observed by Fermi LAT. The
two DAQ systems have an energy threshold that is low enough to observe events
similar to GRB 090510 and GRB 090902b with the characteristics observed by
Fermi LAT. HAWC will provide information about the high-energy spectra of GRBs
which in turn could help to understanding about e-pair attenuation in GRB jets,
extragalactic background light absorption, as well as establishing the highest
energy to which GRBs accelerate particles.