Normalized to: Alister, H.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.4780 [pdf] - 936228
Benchmark stars for Gaia: fundamental properties of the Population II
star HD140283 from interferometric, spectroscopic and photometric data
Creevey, O.;
Thévenin, F.;
Berio, P.;
Heiter, U.;
von Braun, K.;
Mourard, D.;
Bigot, L.;
Boyajian, T. S.;
Kervella, P.;
Morel, P.;
Pichon, B.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Nardetto, N.;
Perraut, K.;
Meilland, A.;
Alister, H. A. Mc;
Brummelaar, T. A. ten;
Sturmann, C. Farrington. J.;
Sturmann, L.;
Turner, N.
Submitted: 2014-10-17, last modified: 2014-12-15
We determined the fundamental properties of HD 140283 by obtaining new
interferometric and spectroscopic measurements and combining them with
photometry from the literature. The interferometric measurements were obtained
using the visible interferometer VEGA on the CHARA array and we determined a 1D
limb-darkened angular diameter of 0.353 +/- 0.013 milliarcseconds. Using
photometry from the literature we derived the bolometric flux with two
solutions: a zero-reddening one of Fbol = 3.890 +/- 0.066 1E-8 erg/s/cm2 and a
solution with a maximum of Av = 0.1 mag, Fbol= 4.220 +/- 0.067 1E-8 erg/s/cm2.
The interferometric Teff is thus 5534 +/- 103 K or 5647 +/- 105 K and its
radius is R = 2.21 +/- 0.08 Rsol. Spectroscopic measurements of HD140283 were
obtained using HARPS, NARVAL, and UVES and a 1D LTE analysis of H-alpha line
wings yields Teff(Halpha) = 5626 +/- 75 K. Using fine-tuned stellar models
including diffusion of elements we then determined the mass M and age t of
HD140283. Once the metallicity has been fixed, the age of the star depends on
M, initial helium abundance Yi and mixing-length parameter alpha, only two of
which are independent. We need to adjust alpha to much lower values than the
solar one (~2) in order to fit the observations, and if Av = 0.0 mag then 0.5 <
alpha < 1. We give an equation to estimate t from M, Yi (alpha) and Av.
Establishing a reference alpha = 1.00 and adopting Yi = 0.245 we derive a mass
and age of HD140283: M = 0.780 +/- 0.010 Msol and t = 13.7 +/- 0.7 Gyr (Av =
0.0) or M = 0.805 +/- 0.010 Msol and t = 12.2 +/- 0.6 Gyr (Av=0.1 mag). Our
stellar models yield an initial metallicity of [Z/X]i = -1.70 and logg = 3.65
+/- 0.03. Asteroseismic observations are critical for overcoming limitations in
our results.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1207.5954 [pdf] - 541890
Fundamental properties of the Population II fiducial stars HD 122563 and
Gmb 1830 from CHARA interferometric observations
Creevey, O. L.;
Thévenin, F.;
Boyajian, T. S.;
Kervella, P.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Bigot, L.;
Mérand, A.;
Heiter, U.;
Morel, P.;
Pichon, B.;
Alister, H. A. Mc;
Brummelaar, T. A. ten;
Collet, R.;
van Belle, G. T.;
Foresto, V. Coudé du;
Farrington, C.;
Goldfinger, P. J.;
Sturmann, J.;
Sturmann, L.;
Turner, N.
Submitted: 2012-07-25
We have determined the angular diameters of two metal-poor stars, HD 122563
and Gmb 1830, using CHARA and Palomar Testbed Interferometer observations. For
the giant star HD 122563, we derive an angular diameter theta_3D = 0.940 +-
0.011 milliarcseconds (mas) using limb-darkening from 3D convection simulations
and for the dwarf star Gmb 1830 (HD 103095) we obtain a 1D limb-darkened
angular diameter theta_1D = 0.679 +- 0.007 mas. Coupling the angular diameters
with photometry yields effective temperatures with precisions better than 55 K
(Teff = 4598 +- 41 K and 4818 +- 54 K --- for the giant and the dwarf star,
respectively). Including their distances results in very well-determined
luminosities and radii (L = 230 +- 6 L_sun, R = 23.9 +- 1.9 R_sun and L = 0.213
+- 0.002 L_sun, R = 0.664 +- 0.015 R_sun, respectively). We used the CESAM2k
stellar structure and evolution code in order to produce models that fit the
observational data. We found values of the mixing-length parameter alpha (which
describes 1D convection) that depend on the mass of the star. The masses were
determined from the models with precisions of <3% and with the well-measured
radii excellent constraints on the surface gravity are obtained (log g = 1.60
+- 0.04, 4.59 +- 0.02, respectively). The very small errors on both log g and
Teff provide stringent constraints for spectroscopic analyses given the
sensitivity of abundances to both of these values. The precise determination of
Teff for the two stars brings into question the photometric scales for
metal-poor stars.