Normalized to: Aliaga, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604070 [pdf] - 81139
Non-Gaussianity in the Very Small Array CMB maps with
Smooth-Goodness-of-fit tests
Rubino-Martin, Jose Alberto;
Aliaga, Antonio M.;
Barreiro, R. B.;
Battye, Richard A.;
Carreira, Pedro;
Cleary, Kieran;
Davies, Rod D.;
Davis, Richard J.;
Dickinson, Clive;
Genova-Santos, Ricardo;
Grainge, Keith;
Gutierrez, Carlos M.;
Hafez, Yaser A.;
Hobson, Michael P.;
Jones, Michael E.;
Kneissl, Rudiger;
Lancaster, Katy;
Lasenby, Anthony;
Leahy, J. P.;
Maisinger, Klaus;
Martinez-Gonzalez, Enrique;
Pooley, Guy G.;
Rajguru, Nutan;
Rebolo, Rafael;
Sanz, Jose Luis;
Saunders, Richard D. E.;
Savage, Richard S.;
Scaife, Anna;
Scott, Paul;
Slosar, Anze;
Taylor, Angela C.;
Titterington, David;
Waldram, Elizabeth;
Watson, Robert A.
Submitted: 2006-04-04
(Abridged) We have used the Rayner & Best (1989) smooth tests of
goodness-of-fit to study the Gaussianity of the Very Small Array (VSA) data.
Out of the 41 published VSA individual pointings dedicated to cosmological
observations, 37 are found to be consistent with Gaussianity, whereas four
pointings show deviations from Gaussianity. In two of them, these deviations
can be explained as residual systematic effects of a few visibility points
which, when corrected, have a negligible impact on the angular power spectrum.
The non-Gaussianity found in the other two (adjacent) pointings seems to be
associated to a local deviation of the power spectrum of these fields with
respect to the common power spectrum of the complete data set, at angular
scales of the third acoustic peak (l = 700-900). No evidence of residual
systematics is found in this case, and unsubstracted point sources are not a
plausible explanation either. If those visibilities are removed, a cosmological
analysis based on this new VSA power spectrum alone shows no differences in the
parameter constraints with respect to our published results, except for the
physical baryon density, which decreases by 10 percent. Finally, the method has
been also used to analyse the VSA observations in the Corona Borealis
supercluster region (Genova-Santos et al. 2005), which show a strong decrement
which cannot be explained as primordial CMB. Our method finds a clear deviation
(99.82%) with respect to Gaussianity in the second-order moment of the
distribution, and which can not be explained as systematic effects. A detailed
study shows that the non-Gaussianity is produced in scales of l~500, and that
this deviation is intrinsic to the data (in the sense that can not be explained
in terms of a Gaussian field with a different power spectrum).
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0411154 [pdf] - 68753
Gaussianity of the CMB: Smooth Goodness of Fit Tests Applied to
Interferometric Data
Submitted: 2004-11-05
We adapt the smooth tests of goodness of fit developed by Rayner and Best to
the study of the non-Gaussianity of interferometric observations of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB). The interferometric measurements (visibilities) are
transformed into signal-to-noise eigenmodes, and then the method is applied
directly in Fourier space. This transformation allows us to perform the
analysis in different subsets of eigenmodes according to their signal-to-noise
level. The method can also deal with non-uniform or incomplete coverage of the
UV plane. We explore here two possibilities: we analyse either the real and
imaginary parts of the complex visibilities (Gaussianly distributed under the
Gaussianity hypothesis) or their phases (uniformly distributed under the
Gaussianity hypothesis). The power of the method in discriminating between
Gaussian and non-Gaussian distributions is studied by using several kinds of
non-Gaussian simulations. On the one hand, we introduce a certain degree of
non-Gaussianity directly into the Fourier space using the Edgeworth expansion,
and afterwards the desired correlation is introduced. On the other hand, we
consider interferometric observations of a map with topological defects (cosmic
strings). To these previous non-Gaussian simulations we add different noise
levels and quantify the required signal-to-noise ratio necessary to achieve a
detection of these non-Gaussian features. Finally, we have also studied the
ability of the method to constrain the so-called nonlinear coupling constant
f_{NL} using chi^2 simulations.The whole method is illustrated here by
application to simulated data from the Very Small Array interferometer.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310706 [pdf] - 1233256
Tests of Gaussianity
Submitted: 2003-10-24
We review two powerful methods to test the Gaussianity of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB): one based on the distribution of spherical wavelet
coefficients and the other on smooth tests of goodness-of-fit. The spherical
wavelet families proposed to analyse the CMB are the Haar and the Mexican Hat
ones. The latter is preferred for detecting non-Gaussian homogeneous and
isotropic primordial models containing some amount of skewness or kurtosis.
Smooth tests of goodness-of-fit have recently been introduced in the field
showing some interesting properties. We will discuss the smooth tests of
goodness-of-fit developed by Rayner and Best for the univariate as well as for
the multivariate analysis.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0309586 [pdf] - 1233223
Goodness-of-fit tests of Gaussianity: constraints on the cumulants of
the MAXIMA data
Submitted: 2003-09-22
In this work, goodness-of-fit tests are adapted and applied to CMB maps to
detect possible non-Gaussianity. We use Shapiro-Francia test and two Smooth
goodness-of-fit tests: one developed by Rayner and Best and another one
developed by Thomas and Pierce. The Smooth tests test small and smooth
deviations of a prefixed probability function (in our case this is the
univariate Gaussian). Also, the Rayner and Best test informs us of the kind of
non-Gaussianity we have: excess of skewness, of kurtosis, and so on. These
tests are optimal when the data are independent. We simulate and analyse
non-Gaussian signals in order to study the power of these tests. These
non-Gaussian simulations are constructed using the Edgeworth expansion, and
assuming pixel-to-pixel independence. As an application, we test the
Gaussianity of the MAXIMA data. Results indicate that the MAXIMA data are
compatible with Gaussianity. Finally, the values of the skewness and kurtosis
of MAXIMA data are constrained by |S| \le 0.035 and |K| \le 0.036 at the 99%
confidence level.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112035 [pdf] - 46408
Non-circular rotating beams and CMB experiments
Submitted: 2001-12-03
This paper is concerned with small angular scale experiments for the
observation of cosmic microwave background anisotropies. In the absence of
beam, the effects of partial coverage and pixelisation are disentangled and
analyzed (using simulations). Then, appropriate maps involving the CMB signal
plus the synchrotron and dust emissions from the Milky Way are simulated, and
an asymmetric beam --which turns following different strategies-- is used to
smooth the simulated maps. An associated circular beam is defined to estimate
the deviations in the angular power spectrum produced by beam asymmetry without
rotation and, afterwards, the deviations due to beam rotation are calculated.
For a certain large coverage, the deviations due to pure asymmetry and
asymmetry plus rotation appear to be very systematic (very similar in each
simulation). Possible applications of the main results of this paper to data
analysis in large coverage experiments --as PLANCK-- are outlined.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110664 [pdf] - 45721
CMB anisotropy: deviations from Gaussianity due to non-linear gravity
Submitted: 2001-10-30
Non-linear evolution of cosmological energy density fluctuations triggers
deviations from Gaussianity in the temperature distribution of the cosmic
microwave background. A method to estimate these deviations is proposed. N-body
simulations -- in a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology -- are used to simulate the strongly
non-linear evolution of cosmological structures. It is proved that these
simulations can be combined with the potential approximation to calculate the
statistical moments of the CMB anisotropies produced by non-linear gravity.
Some of these moments are computed and the resulting values are different from
those corresponding to Gaussianity.