Normalized to: Albers, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01069 [pdf] - 2113311
A Global Fireball Observatory
Devillepoix, H. A. R.;
Cupák, M.;
Bland, P. A.;
Sansom, E. K.;
Towner, M. C.;
Howie, R. M.;
Hartig, B. A. D.;
Jansen-Sturgeon, T.;
Shober, P. M.;
Anderson, S. L.;
Benedix, G. K.;
Busan, D.;
Sayers, R.;
Jenniskens, P.;
Albers, J.;
Herd, C. D. K.;
Hill, P. J. A.;
Brown, P. G.;
Krzeminski, Z.;
Osinski, G. R.;
Aoudjehane, H. Chennaoui;
Benkhaldoun, Z.;
Jabiri, A.;
Guennoun, M.;
Barka, A.;
Darhmaoui, H.;
Daly, L.;
Collins, G. S.;
McMullan, S.;
Suttle, M. D.;
Ireland, T.;
Bonning, G.;
Baeza, L.;
Alrefay, T. Y.;
Horner, J.;
Swindle, T. D.;
Hergenrother, C. W.;
Fries, M. D.;
Tomkins, A.;
Langendam, A.;
Rushmer, T.;
O'Neill, C.;
Janches, D.;
Hormaechea, J. L.;
Shaw, C.;
Young, J. S.;
Alexander, M.;
Mardon, A. D.;
Tate, J. R.
Submitted: 2020-04-02, last modified: 2020-06-12
The world's meteorite collections contain a very rich picture of what the
early Solar System would have been made of, however the lack of spatial context
with respect to their parent population for these samples is an issue. The
asteroid population is equally as rich in surface mineralogies, and mapping
these two populations (meteorites and asteroids) together is a major challenge
for planetary science. Directly probing asteroids achieves this at a high cost.
Observing meteorite falls and calculating their pre-atmospheric orbit on the
other hand, is a cheaper way to approach the problem. The Global Fireball
Observatory (GFO) collaboration was established in 2017 and brings together
multiple institutions (from Australia, USA, Canada, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the
UK, and Argentina) to maximise the area for fireball observation time and
therefore meteorite recoveries. The members have a choice to operate
independently, but they can also choose to work in a fully collaborative manner
with other GFO partners. This efficient approach leverages the experience
gained from the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) pathfinder project in Australia.
The state-of-the art technology (DFN camera systems and data reduction) and
experience of the support teams is shared between all partners, freeing up time
for science investigations and meteorite searching. With all networks combined
together, the GFO collaboration already covers 0.6% of the Earth's surface for
meteorite recovery as of mid-2019, and aims to reach 2% in the early 2020s. We
estimate that after 5 years of operation, the GFO will have observed a fireball
from virtually every meteorite type. This combined effort will bring new,
fresh, extra-terrestrial material to the labs, yielding new insights about the
formation of the Solar System.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01017 [pdf] - 2074548
Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small
Kuiper Belt Object
Stern, S. A.;
Weaver, H. A.;
Spencer, J. R.;
Olkin, C. B.;
Gladstone, G. R.;
Grundy, W. M.;
Moore, J. M.;
Cruikshank, D. P.;
Elliott, H. A.;
McKinnon, W. B.;
Parker, J. Wm.;
Verbiscer, A. J.;
Young, L. A.;
Aguilar, D. A.;
Albers, J. M.;
Andert, T.;
Andrews, J. P.;
Bagenal, F.;
Banks, M. E.;
Bauer, B. A.;
Bauman, J. A.;
Bechtold, K. E.;
Beddingfield, C. B.;
Behrooz, N.;
Beisser, K. B.;
Benecchi, S. D.;
Bernardoni, E.;
Beyer, R. A.;
Bhaskaran, S.;
Bierson, C. J.;
Binzel, R. P.;
Birath, E. M.;
Bird, M. K.;
Boone, D. R.;
Bowman, A. F.;
Bray, V. J.;
Britt, D. T.;
Brown, L. E.;
Buckley, M. R.;
Buie, M. W.;
Buratti, B. J.;
Burke, L. M.;
Bushman, S. S.;
Carcich, B.;
Chaikin, A. L.;
Chavez, C. L.;
Cheng, A. F.;
Colwell, E. J.;
Conard, S. J.;
Conner, M. P.;
Conrad, C. A.;
Cook, J. C.;
Cooper, S. B.;
Custodio, O. S.;
Ore, C. M. Dalle;
Deboy, C. C.;
Dharmavaram, P.;
Dhingra, R. D.;
Dunn, G. F.;
Earle, A. M.;
Egan, A. F.;
Eisig, J.;
El-Maarry, M. R.;
Engelbrecht, C.;
Enke, B. L.;
Ercol, C. J.;
Fattig, E. D.;
Ferrell, C. L.;
Finley, T. J.;
Firer, J.;
Fischetti, J.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Fosbury, M. N.;
Fountain, G. H.;
Freeze, J. M.;
Gabasova, L.;
Glaze, L. S.;
Green, J. L.;
Griffith, G. A.;
Guo, Y.;
Hahn, M.;
Hals, D. W.;
Hamilton, D. P.;
Hamilton, S. A.;
Hanley, J. J.;
Harch, A.;
Harmon, K. A.;
Hart, H. M.;
Hayes, J.;
Hersman, C. B.;
Hill, M. E.;
Hill, T. A.;
Hofgartner, J. D.;
Holdridge, M. E.;
Horányi, M.;
Hosadurga, A.;
Howard, A. D.;
Howett, C. J. A.;
Jaskulek, S. E.;
Jennings, D. E.;
Jensen, J. R.;
Jones, M. R.;
Kang, H. K.;
Katz, D. J.;
Kaufmann, D. E.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Keane, J. T.;
Keleher, G. P.;
Kinczyk, M.;
Kochte, M. C.;
Kollmann, P.;
Krimigis, S. M.;
Kruizinga, G. L.;
Kusnierkiewicz, D. Y.;
Lahr, M. S.;
Lauer, T. R.;
Lawrence, G. B.;
Lee, J. E.;
Lessac-Chenen, E. J.;
Linscott, I. R.;
Lisse, C. M.;
Lunsford, A. W.;
Mages, D. M.;
Mallder, V. A.;
Martin, N. P.;
May, B. H.;
McComas, D. J.;
McNutt, R. L.;
Mehoke, Jr. D. S.;
Mehoke, T. S.;
Nelson, D. S.;
Nguyen, H. D.;
Núñez, J. I.;
Ocampo, A. C.;
Owen, W. M.;
Oxton, G. K.;
Parker, A. H.;
Pätzold, M.;
Pelgrift, J. Y.;
Pelletier, F. J.;
Pineau, J. P.;
Piquette, M. R.;
Porter, S. B.;
Protopapa, S.;
Quirico, E.;
Redfern, J. A.;
Regiec, A. L.;
Reitsema, H. J.;
Reuter, D. C.;
Richardson, D. C.;
Riedel, J. E.;
Ritterbush, M. A.;
Robbins, S. J.;
Rodgers, D. J.;
Rogers, G. D.;
Rose, D. M.;
Rosendall, P. E.;
Runyon, K. D.;
Ryschkewitsch, M. G.;
Saina, M. M.;
Salinas, M. J.;
Schenk, P. M.;
Scherrer, J. R.;
Schlei, W. R.;
Schmitt, B.;
Schultz, D. J.;
Schurr, D. C.;
Scipioni, F.;
Sepan, R. L.;
Shelton, R. G.;
Showalter, M. R.;
Simon, M.;
Singer, K. N.;
Stahlheber, E. W.;
Stanbridge, D. R.;
Stansberry, J. A.;
Steffl, A. J.;
Strobel, D. F.;
Stothoff, M. M.;
Stryk, T.;
Stuart, J. R.;
Summers, M. E.;
Tapley, M. B.;
Taylor, A.;
Taylor, H. W.;
Tedford, R. M.;
Throop, H. B.;
Turner, L. S.;
Umurhan, O. M.;
Van Eck, J.;
Velez, D.;
Versteeg, M. H.;
Vincent, M. A.;
Webbert, R. W.;
Weidner, S. E.;
Weigle, G. E.;
Wendel, J. R.;
White, O. L.;
Whittenburg, K. E.;
Williams, B. G.;
Williams, K. E.;
Williams, S. P.;
Winters, H. L.;
Zangari, A. M.;
Zurbuchen, T. H.
Submitted: 2020-04-02
The Kuiper Belt is a distant region of the Solar System. On 1 January 2019,
the New Horizons spacecraft flew close to (486958) 2014 MU69, a Cold Classical
Kuiper Belt Object, a class of objects that have never been heated by the Sun
and are therefore well preserved since their formation. Here we describe
initial results from these encounter observations. MU69 is a bi-lobed contact
binary with a flattened shape, discrete geological units, and noticeable albedo
heterogeneity. However, there is little surface color and compositional
heterogeneity. No evidence for satellites, ring or dust structures, gas coma,
or solar wind interactions was detected. By origin MU69 appears consistent with
pebble cloud collapse followed by a low velocity merger of its two lobes.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.05764 [pdf] - 1966850
CosmicNet I: Physics-driven implementation of neural networks within
Boltzmann-Einstein solvers
Submitted: 2019-07-12, last modified: 2019-07-15
Einstein-Boltzmann Solvers (EBSs) are run on a massive scale by the cosmology
community when fitting cosmological models to data. We present a new concept
for speeding up such codes with neural networks. The originality of our
approach stems from not substituting the whole EBS by a machine learning
algorithm, but only its most problematic and least parallelizable step: the
integration of perturbation equations over time. This approach offers two
significant advantages: the task depends only on a subset of cosmological
parameters, and it is blind to the characteristics of the experiment for which
the output must be computed (for instance, redshift bins). These allow us to
construct a fast and highly re-usable network. In this proof-of-concept paper,
we focus on the prediction of CMB source functions, and design our networks
according to physical considerations and analytical approximations. This allows
us to reduce the depth and training time of the networks compared to a
brute-force approach. Indeed, the calculation of the source functions using the
networks is fast enough so that it is not a bottleneck in the EBS anymore.
Finally, we show that their accuracy is more than sufficient for accurate MCMC
parameter inference from Planck data. This paves the way for a new project,
CosmicNet, aimed at gradually extending the use and the range of validity of
neural networks within EBSs, and saving massive computational time in the
context of cosmological parameter extraction.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9810436 [pdf] - 103552
Anomalous Gravitational Effects in the Universe
Submitted: 1998-10-27
Based on previously published alternative reflections on gravitation,
additional conclusions concerning anomalous gravitational effects in the
universe are derived. For systems with spherical mass distribution and high
central density of the luminous matter, abnormal increases in the gravitational
potential towards the centers of these systems are derived. These anomalous
increases are calculated on the basis of the amount and distribution of the
observed luminous matter. For spiral galaxies, the calculation yields the
astonishing result that the anomalous part of the gravitational potential is
not produced by the large mass of the spiral system but by the small mass of
the central bulge. A noticeable anomalous increase can only be expected close
to the center, e.g. in the innermost region with a diameter on the order of
only 1 pc in a bulge with a radius of 500 pc. Experimental observations are
cited reporting such anomalous gravitational effects in the four spherical
systems considered: globular star clusters, the bulges of spiral galaxies,
elliptical galaxies, and clusters of galaxies. Conventionally, on the basis of
Newtonian Mechanics and the amount of luminous matter, these effects are
unexpected. They are most commonly explained by assuming the existence of
appropriate large black holes or a sufficient amount of dark matter.