Akhlaghi, I. A.
Normalized to: Akhlaghi, I.
2 article(s) in total. 4 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1809.08792 [pdf] - 1877859
Can Holographic dark energy models fit the observational data?
Submitted: 2018-09-24, last modified: 2018-10-02
In this work we investigate the holographic dark energy models with slowly
time-varying model parameter defined based on the current Hubble horizon length
scale. While the previous studies on the three popular holographic dark energy
models defined based on the future event horizon, Ricci scale and
Granda-Oliveros IR cutoffs showed that these models cannot fit the
observational data [1], in this work we show that the holographic dark energy
models with time-varying model parameter defined on the current Hubble radius
are well favored by observations. Using the standard $\chi^2$ minimization in
the context of Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, we compare the ability of
holographic dark energy models with time-varying $c^2$ parameter constructed on
the current Hubble length scale against different sets of observational data
namely expansion data, growth rate data and expansion+growth rate data
respectively. Based on the values of Akaike and Bayesian information criteria,
we find that these types of holographic dark energy models are well fitted to
both expansion and growth rate observations as equal to $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.
We also put constraints on the cosmological parameters and show that the
transition epoch form early decelerated to current accelerated expansion
calculated in holographic dark energy models with time-varying model parameter
defined on the Hubble length is consistent with observations.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.02989 [pdf] - 1700973
Model selection and constraints from Holographic dark energy scenarios
Submitted: 2018-04-05
In this study we combine the expansion and the growth data in order to
investigate the ability of the three most popular holographic dark energy
models, namely event future horizon, Ricci scale and Granda-Oliveros IR
cutoffs, to fit the data. Using a standard $\chi^2$ minimization method we
place tight constraints on the free parameters of the models. Based on the
values of the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria we find that two out of
three holographic dark energy models are disfavored by the data, because they
predict a non-negligible amount of dark energy density at early enough times.
Although the growth rate data are relatively consistent with the holographic
dark energy models which are based on Ricci scale and Granda-Oliveros IR
cutoffs, the combined analysis provides strong indications against these
models. Finally, we find that the model for which the holographic dark energy
is related with the future horizon is consistent with the combined
observational data.