sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Akbal, O.

Normalized to: Akbal, O.

3 article(s) in total. 5 co-authors, from 1 to 3 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.01160  [pdf] - 1585521
Minimum Glitch of the Crab Pulsar and the Crustquake as a Trigger Mechanism
Comments: 5 pages, 1 figures. Approved by MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-07-04, last modified: 2017-09-27
We discuss the minimum glitch size of Crab observed by Espinoza et al. (2014). Modelling the crustquake as a trigger mechanism we estimate the size of the broken plate. The plate size obtained, D $\sim 100 m$ is comparable to plate size estimates for PSR J1119--6127. The plate size naturally leads to an estimate of the number of unpinned vortices involved in the glitch, $N \sim 10^{13} $. This number is of the same order in all Crab and Vela pulsar glitches. The mimimum glitch relates the constancy of all these numbers among different pulsars to the basic plate size involved in crust breaking. This in turn depends on the critical strain angle $\theta_{cr}$ of the Coulomb lattice in the neutron star crust. The minimum glitch size implies $\theta_{cr} \sim 10^{-1}$ in agreement with theoretical and computational estimates.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1612.03805  [pdf] - 1580874
Nonlinear interglitch dynamics, the braking index of the Vela pulsar and the time to the next glitch
Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, Accepted by MNRAS
Submitted: 2016-12-12, last modified: 2017-06-02
The inter-glitch timing of the Vela pulsar is characterized by a constant second derivative of the rotation rate. This takes over after the post-glitch exponential relaxation, and is completed at about the time of the next glitch. The vortex creep model explains the second derivatives in terms of non-linear response to the glitch. We present inter-glitch timing fits to the present sample covering 16 large glitches, taking into account the possibility that in some glitches part of the step in spin-down rate may involve a "persistent shift", as observed in the Crab pulsar. Modifying the expression for the time between glitches with this hypothesis leads to better agreement with the observed inter-glitch time intervals. We extrapolate the inter-glitch model fits to obtain spin-down rates just prior to each glitch, and use these to calculate the braking index n = 2.81 +/- 0.12. The next glitch should occur around Dec. 22, 2017 +/- 197 days if no persistent shift is involved, but could occur as early as July 27, 2016 +/- 152 days if the 2013 glitch gave rise to a typical Vela persistent shift. Note added: Literally while we were submitting the first version of this paper, on Dec. 12, 2016, we saw ATel # 9847 announcing a Vela pulsar glitch which has arrived 138 days after our prediction with a persistent shift, within the 1 sigma uncertainty of 152 days.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1502.03786  [pdf] - 1224418
Peculiar Glitch of PSR J1119-6127 and Extension of the Vortex Creep Model
Comments: accepted by MNRAS, 10 pages, 2 figures
Submitted: 2015-02-12
Glitches are sudden changes in rotation frequency and spin-down rate, observed from pulsars of all ages. Standard glitches are characterized by a positive step in angular velocity ($\Delta\Omega$ $ > $ $0$) and a negative step in the spin-down rate ($\Delta \dot \Omega$ $ < $ $0$) of the pulsar. There are no glitch-associated changes in the electromagnetic signature of rotation-powered pulsars in all cases so far. For the first time, in the last glitch of PSR J1119-6127, there is clear evidence for changing emission properties coincident with the glitch. This glitch is also unusual in its signature. Further, the absolute value of the spin-down rate actually decreases in the long term. This is in contrast to usual glitch behaviour. In this paper we extend the vortex creep model in order to take into account these peculiarities. We propose that a starquake with crustal plate movement towards the rotational poles of the star induces inward vortex motion which causes the unusual glitch signature. The component of the magnetic field perpendicular to the rotation axis will decrease, giving rise to a permanent change in the pulsar external torque.