Normalized to: Akbal, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01160 [pdf] - 1585521
Minimum Glitch of the Crab Pulsar and the Crustquake as a Trigger
Mechanism
Submitted: 2017-07-04, last modified: 2017-09-27
We discuss the minimum glitch size of Crab observed by Espinoza et al.
(2014). Modelling the crustquake as a trigger mechanism we estimate the size of
the broken plate. The plate size obtained, D $\sim 100 m$ is comparable to
plate size estimates for PSR J1119--6127. The plate size naturally leads to an
estimate of the number of unpinned vortices involved in the glitch, $N \sim
10^{13} $. This number is of the same order in all Crab and Vela pulsar
glitches. The mimimum glitch relates the constancy of all these numbers among
different pulsars to the basic plate size involved in crust breaking. This in
turn depends on the critical strain angle $\theta_{cr}$ of the Coulomb lattice
in the neutron star crust. The minimum glitch size implies $\theta_{cr} \sim
10^{-1}$ in agreement with theoretical and computational estimates.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.03805 [pdf] - 1580874
Nonlinear interglitch dynamics, the braking index of the Vela pulsar and
the time to the next glitch
Submitted: 2016-12-12, last modified: 2017-06-02
The inter-glitch timing of the Vela pulsar is characterized by a constant
second derivative of the rotation rate. This takes over after the post-glitch
exponential relaxation, and is completed at about the time of the next glitch.
The vortex creep model explains the second derivatives in terms of non-linear
response to the glitch. We present inter-glitch timing fits to the present
sample covering 16 large glitches, taking into account the possibility that in
some glitches part of the step in spin-down rate may involve a "persistent
shift", as observed in the Crab pulsar. Modifying the expression for the time
between glitches with this hypothesis leads to better agreement with the
observed inter-glitch time intervals. We extrapolate the inter-glitch model
fits to obtain spin-down rates just prior to each glitch, and use these to
calculate the braking index n = 2.81 +/- 0.12. The next glitch should occur
around Dec. 22, 2017 +/- 197 days if no persistent shift is involved, but could
occur as early as July 27, 2016 +/- 152 days if the 2013 glitch gave rise to a
typical Vela persistent shift. Note added: Literally while we were submitting
the first version of this paper, on Dec. 12, 2016, we saw ATel # 9847
announcing a Vela pulsar glitch which has arrived 138 days after our prediction
with a persistent shift, within the 1 sigma uncertainty of 152 days.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.03786 [pdf] - 1224418
Peculiar Glitch of PSR J1119-6127 and Extension of the Vortex Creep
Model
Submitted: 2015-02-12
Glitches are sudden changes in rotation frequency and spin-down rate,
observed from pulsars of all ages. Standard glitches are characterized by a
positive step in angular velocity ($\Delta\Omega$ $ > $ $0$) and a negative
step in the spin-down rate ($\Delta \dot \Omega$ $ < $ $0$) of the pulsar.
There are no glitch-associated changes in the electromagnetic signature of
rotation-powered pulsars in all cases so far. For the first time, in the last
glitch of PSR J1119-6127, there is clear evidence for changing emission
properties coincident with the glitch. This glitch is also unusual in its
signature. Further, the absolute value of the spin-down rate actually decreases
in the long term. This is in contrast to usual glitch behaviour. In this paper
we extend the vortex creep model in order to take into account these
peculiarities. We propose that a starquake with crustal plate movement towards
the rotational poles of the star induces inward vortex motion which causes the
unusual glitch signature. The component of the magnetic field perpendicular to
the rotation axis will decrease, giving rise to a permanent change in the
pulsar external torque.