Normalized to: Ago, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05677 [pdf] - 1510229
Discovery of a Gas giant Planet in Microlensing Event OGLE-2014-BLG-1760
Bhattacharya, A.;
Bennett, D. P.;
Bond, I. A.;
Sumi, T.;
Udalski, A.;
Street, R.;
Tsapras, Y.;
Abe, F.;
Freeman, M.;
Fukui, A.;
Itow, Y.;
Li, M. C. A.;
Ling, C. H.;
Masuda, K.;
Matsubara, Y.;
Muraki, Y.;
Ohnishi, K.;
Philpott, L. C.;
Rattenbury, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sharan, A.;
Sullivan, D. J.;
Suzuki, D.;
Tristram, P. J.;
Szymański, M. K.;
Soszyński, I.;
Poleski, R.;
Kozlowski, S.;
Pietrukowicz, P.;
Ulaczyk, K.;
Wyrzykowski, L.;
Bachelet, E;
Bramich, D. M.;
Ago, G. D';
Dominik, M.;
Jaimes, R. Figuera;
Horne, K.;
Hundertmark, M.;
Kains, N.;
Menzies, J.;
Schmidt, R.;
Snodgrass, C.;
Steele, I. A.;
Wambsganss, J
Submitted: 2016-03-17, last modified: 2016-03-22
We present the analysis of the planetary microlensing event
OGLE-2014-BLG-1760, which shows a strong light curve signal due to the presence
of a Jupiter mass-ratio planet. One unusual feature of this event is that the
source star is quite blue, with $V-I = 1.48\pm 0.08$. This is marginally
consistent with source star in the Galactic bulge, but it could possibly
indicate a young source star in the far side of the disk. Assuming a bulge
source, we perform a Bayesian analysis assuming a standard Galactic model, and
this indicates that the planetary system resides in or near the Galactic bulge
at $D_L = 6.9 \pm 1.1 $ kpc. It also indicates a host star mass of $M_* = 0.51
\pm 0.44 M_\odot$, a planet mass of $m_p = 180 \pm 110 M_\oplus$, and a
projected star-planet separation of $a_\perp = 1.7\pm 0.3\,$AU. The lens-source
relative proper motion is $\mu_{\rm rel} = 6.5\pm 1.1$ mas/yr. The lens (and
stellar host star) is predicted to be very faint, so it is most likely that it
can detected only when the lens and source stars are partially resolved. Due to
the relatively high relative proper motion, the lens and source will be
resolved to about $\sim46\,$mas in 6-8 years after the peak magnification. So,
by 2020 - 2022, we can hope to detect the lens star with deep, high resolution
images.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.02724 [pdf] - 1301609
Red noise versus planetary interpretations in the microlensing event
OGLE-2013-BLG-446
Bachelet, E.;
Bramich, D. M.;
Han, C.;
Greenhill, J.;
Street, R. A.;
Gould, A.;
Ago, G. D;
AlSubai, K.;
Dominik, M.;
Jaimes, R. Figuera;
Horne, K.;
Hundertmark, M.;
Kains, N.;
Snodgrass, C.;
Steele, I. A.;
Tsapras, Y.;
Albrow, M. D.;
Batista, V.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Bennett, D. P.;
Brillant, S.;
Caldwell, J. A. R.;
Cassan, A.;
Cole, A.;
Coutures, C.;
Dieters, S.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donatowicz, J.;
Fouque, P.;
Hill, K.;
Marquette, J. -B.;
Menzies, J.;
Pere, C.;
Ranc, C.;
Wambsganss, J.;
Warren, D.;
de Almeida, L. Andrade;
Choi, J. -Y.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Dong, Subo;
Hung, L. -W.;
Hwang, K. H.;
Jablonski, F.;
Jung, Y. K.;
Kaspi, S.;
Klein, N.;
Lee, C. -U.;
Maoz, D.;
Munoz, J. A.;
Nataf, D.;
Park, H.;
Pogge, R. W.;
Polishook, D.;
Shin, I. -G.;
Shporer, A.;
Abe, J. C. Yee F.;
Bhattacharya, A.;
Bond, I. A.;
Botzler, C. S.;
Freeman, M.;
Fukui, A.;
Itow, Y.;
Koshimoto, N.;
Ling, C. H.;
Masuda, K.;
Matsubara, Y.;
Muraki, Y.;
Ohnishi, K.;
Philpott, L. C.;
Rattenbury, N.;
Saito, To.;
Sullivan, D. J.;
Sumi, T.;
Suzuki, D.;
P.;
Tristram, J.;
Yonehara, A.;
Bozza, V.;
Novati, S. Calchi;
Ciceri, S.;
Galianni, P.;
Gu, S. H.;
Harpsoe, K.;
Hinse, T. C.;
Jorgensen, U. G.;
Juncher, D.;
Korhonen, H.;
Mancini, L.;
Melchiorre, C.;
Popovas, A.;
Postiglione, A.;
Rabus, M.;
Rahvar, S.;
Schmidt, R. W.;
Scarpetta, G.;
Skottfelt, J.;
Southworth, John;
Stabile, An.;
Surdej, J.;
Wang, X. -B.;
Wertz, O.
Submitted: 2015-10-09, last modified: 2015-10-28
For all exoplanet candidates, the reliability of a claimed detection needs to
be assessed through a careful study of systematic errors in the data to
minimize the false positives rate. We present a method to investigate such
systematics in microlensing datasets using the microlensing event
OGLE-2013-BLG-0446 as a case study. The event was observed from multiple sites
around the world and its high magnification (A_{max} \sim 3000) allowed us to
investigate the effects of terrestrial and annual parallax. Real-time modeling
of the event while it was still ongoing suggested the presence of an extremely
low-mass companion (\sim 3M_\oplus ) to the lensing star, leading to
substantial follow-up coverage of the light curve. We test and compare
different models for the light curve and conclude that the data do not favour
the planetary interpretation when systematic errors are taken into account.
