Normalized to: Agnor, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.05747 [pdf] - 1323351
The EChO science case
Tinetti, Giovanna;
Drossart, Pierre;
Eccleston, Paul;
Hartogh, Paul;
Isaak, Kate;
Linder, Martin;
Lovis, Christophe;
Micela, Giusi;
Ollivier, Marc;
Puig, Ludovic;
Ribas, Ignasi;
Snellen, Ignas;
Allard, Bruce Swinyard. France;
Barstow, Joanna;
Cho, James;
Coustenis, Athena;
Cockell, Charles;
Correia, Alexandre;
Decin, Leen;
de Kok, Remco;
Deroo, Pieter;
Encrenaz, Therese;
Forget, Francois;
Glasse, Alistair;
Griffith, Caitlin;
Guillot, Tristan;
Koskinen, Tommi;
Lammer, Helmut;
Leconte, Jeremy;
Maxted, Pierre;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Nelson, Richard;
North, Chris;
Pallé, Enric;
Pagano, Isabella;
Piccioni, Guseppe;
Pinfield, David;
Selsis, Franck;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Stixrude, Lars;
Tennyson, Jonathan;
Turrini, Diego;
Beaulieu, Mariarosa Zapatero-Osorio. Jean-Philippe;
Grodent, Denis;
Guedel, Manuel;
Luz, David;
Nørgaard-Nielsen, Hans Ulrik;
Ray, Tom;
Rickman, Hans;
Selig, Avri;
Banaszkiewicz, Mark Swain. Marek;
Barlow, Mike;
Bowles, Neil;
Branduardi-Raymont, Graziella;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Gerard, Jean-Claude;
Gizon, Laurent;
Hornstrup, Allan;
Jarchow, Christopher;
Kerschbaum, Franz;
Kovacs, Géza;
Lagage, Pierre-Olivier;
Lim, Tanya;
Lopez-Morales, Mercedes;
Malaguti, Giuseppe;
Pace, Emanuele;
Pascale, Enzo;
Vandenbussche, Bart;
Wright, Gillian;
Adriani, Gonzalo Ramos Zapata. Alberto;
Azzollini, Ruymán;
Balado, Ana;
Bryson, Ian;
Burston, Raymond;
Colomé, Josep;
Foresto, Vincent Coudé du;
Crook, Martin;
Di Giorgio, Anna;
Griffin, Matt;
Hoogeveen, Ruud;
Ottensamer, Roland;
Irshad, Ranah;
Middleton, Kevin;
Morgante, Gianluca;
Pinsard, Frederic;
Rataj, Mirek;
Reess, Jean-Michel;
Savini, Giorgio;
Schrader, Jan-Rutger;
Stamper, Richard;
Abe, Berend Winter. L.;
Abreu, M.;
Achilleos, N.;
Ade, P.;
Adybekian, V.;
Affer, L.;
Agnor, C.;
Agundez, M.;
Alard, C.;
Alcala, J.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Floriano, F. J. Alonso;
Altieri, F.;
Iglesias, C. A. Alvarez;
Amado, P.;
Andersen, A.;
Aylward, A.;
Baffa, C.;
Bakos, G.;
Ballerini, P.;
Banaszkiewicz, M.;
Barber, R. J.;
Barrado, D.;
Barton, E. J.;
Batista, V.;
Bellucci, G.;
Avilés, J. A. Belmonte;
Berry, D.;
Bézard, B.;
Biondi, D.;
Błęcka, M.;
Boisse, I.;
Bonfond, B.;
Bordé, P.;
Börner, P.;
Bouy, H.;
Brown, L.;
Buchhave, L.;
Budaj, J.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Burleigh, M.;
Cabral, A.;
Capria, M. T.;
Cassan, A.;
Cavarroc, C.;
Cecchi-Pestellini, C.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chadney, J.;
Chamberlain, S.;
Charnoz, S.;
Jessen, N. Christian;
Ciaravella, A.;
Claret, A.;
Claudi, R.;
Coates, A.;
Cole, R.;
Collura, A.;
Cordier, D.;
Covino, E.;
Danielski, C.;
Damasso, M.;
Deeg, H. J.;
Delgado-Mena, E.;
Del Vecchio, C.;
Demangeon, O.;
De Sio, A.;
De Wit, J.;
Dobrijévic, M.;
Doel, P.;
Dominic, C.;
Dorfi, E.;
Eales, S.;
Eiroa, C.;
Contreras, M. Espinoza;
Esposito, M.;
Eymet, V.;
Fabrizio, N.;
Fernández, M.;
Castella, B. Femenía;
Figueira, P.;
Filacchione, G.;
Fletcher, L.;
Focardi, M.;
Fossey, S.;
Fouqué, P.;
Frith, J.;
Galand, M.;
Gambicorti, L.;
Gaulme, P.;
López, R. J. García;
Garcia-Piquer, A.;
Gear, W.;
Gerard, J. -C.;
Gesa, L.;
Giani, E.;
Gianotti, F.;
Gillon, M.;
Giro, E.;
Giuranna, M.;
Gomez, H.;
Gomez-Leal, I.;
Hernandez, J. Gonzalez;
Merino, B. González;
Graczyk, R.;
Grassi, D.;
Guardia, J.;
Guio, P.;
Gustin, J.;
Hargrave, P.;
Haigh, J.;
Hébrard, E.;
Heiter, U.;
Heredero, R. L.;
Herrero, E.;
Hersant, F.;
Heyrovsky, D.;
Hollis, M.;
Hubert, B.;
Hueso, R.;
Israelian, G.;
Iro, N.;
Irwin, P.;
Jacquemoud, S.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, H.;
Justtanont, K.;
Kehoe, T.;
Kerschbaum, F.;
Kerins, E.;
Kervella, P.;
Kipping, D.;
Koskinen, T.;
Krupp, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Laken, B.;
Lanza, N.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leto, G.;
Goldaracena, J. Licandro;
Lithgow-Bertelloni, C.;
Liu, S. J.;
Cicero, U. Lo;
Lodieu, N.;
Lognonné, P.;
Lopez-Puertas, M.;
Lopez-Valverde, M. A.;
Rasmussen, I. Lundgaard;
Luntzer, A.;
Machado, P.;
MacTavish, C.;
Maggio, A.;
Maillard, J. -P.;
Magnes, W.;
Maldonado, J.;
Mall, U.;
Marquette, J. -B.;
Mauskopf, P.;
Massi, F.;
Maurin, A. -S.;
Medvedev, A.;
Michaut, C.;
Miles-Paez, P.;
Montalto, M.;
Rodríguez, P. Montañés;
Monteiro, M.;
Montes, D.;
Morais, H.;
Morales, J. C.;
Morales-Calderón, M.;
Morello, G.;
Martín, A. Moro;
Moses, J.;
Bedon, A. Moya;
Alcaino, F. Murgas;
Oliva, E.;
Orton, G.;
Palla, F.;
Pancrazzi, M.;
Pantin, E.;
Parmentier, V.;
Parviainen, H.;
Ramírez, K. Y. Peña;
Peralta, J.;
Perez-Hoyos, S.;
Petrov, R.;
Pezzuto, S.;
Pietrzak, R.;
Pilat-Lohinger, E.;
Piskunov, N.;
Prinja, R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Polichtchouk, I.;
Poretti, E.;
Radioti, A.;
Ramos, A. A.;
Rank-Lüftinger, T.;
Read, P.;
Readorn, K.;
López, R. Rebolo;
Rebordão, J.;
Rengel, M.;
Rezac, L.;
Rocchetto, M.;
Rodler, F.;
Béjar, V. J. Sánchez;
Lavega, A. Sanchez;
Sanromá, E.;
Santos, N.;
Forcada, J. Sanz;
Scandariato, G.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Scholz, A.;
Scuderi, S.;
Sethenadh, J.;
Shore, S.;
Showman, A.;
Sicardy, B.;
Sitek, P.;
Smith, A.;
Soret, L.;
Sousa, S.;
Stiepen, A.;
Stolarski, M.;
Strazzulla, G.;
Tabernero, H. M;
Tanga, P.;
Tecsa, M.;
Temple, J.;
Terenzi, L.;
Tessenyi, M.;
Testi, L.;
Thompson, S.;
Thrastarson, H.;
Tingley, B. W.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Torres, J. Martín;
Tozzi, A.;
Turrini, D.;
Varley, R.;
Vakili, F.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Valdivieso, M. L.;
Venot, O.;
Villaver, E.;
Vinatier, S.;
Viti, S.;
Waldmann, I.;
Waltham, D.;
Ward-Thompson, D.;
Waters, R.;
Watkins, C.;
Watson, D.;
Wawer, P.;
Wawrzaszk, A.;
White, G.;
Widemann, T.;
Winek, W.;
Wiśniowski, T.;
Yelle, R.;
Yung, Y.;
Yurchenko, S. N.
Submitted: 2015-02-19
The discovery of almost 2000 exoplanets has revealed an unexpectedly diverse
planet population. Observations to date have shown that our Solar System is
certainly not representative of the general population of planets in our Milky
Way. The key science questions that urgently need addressing are therefore:
What are exoplanets made of? Why are planets as they are? What causes the
exceptional diversity observed as compared to the Solar System?
EChO (Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory) has been designed as a
dedicated survey mission for transit and eclipse spectroscopy capable of
observing a large and diverse planet sample within its four-year mission
lifetime. EChO can target the atmospheres of super-Earths, Neptune-like, and
Jupiter-like planets, in the very hot to temperate zones (planet temperatures
of 300K-3000K) of F to M-type host stars. Over the next ten years, several new
ground- and space-based transit surveys will come on-line (e.g. NGTS, CHEOPS,
TESS, PLATO), which will specifically focus on finding bright, nearby systems.
The current rapid rate of discovery would allow the target list to be further
optimised in the years prior to EChO's launch and enable the atmospheric
characterisation of hundreds of planets. Placing the satellite at L2 provides a
cold and stable thermal environment, as well as a large field of regard to
allow efficient time-critical observation of targets randomly distributed over
the sky. A 1m class telescope is sufficiently large to achieve the necessary
spectro-photometric precision. The spectral coverage (0.5-11 micron, goal 16
micron) and SNR to be achieved by EChO, thanks to its high stability and
dedicated design, would enable a very accurate measurement of the atmospheric
composition and structure of hundreds of exoplanets.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1410.6815 [pdf] - 1222790
Embryo impacts and gas giant mergers II: Diversity of Hot Jupiters'
internal structure
Submitted: 2014-10-24
We consider the origin of compact, short-period, Jupiter-mass planets. We
propose that their diverse structure is caused by giant impacts of embryos and
super-Earths or mergers with other gas giants during the formation and
evolution of these hot Jupiters. Through a series of numerical simulations, we
show that typical head-on collisions generally lead to total coalescence of
impinging gas giants. Although extremely energetic collisions can disintegrate
the envelope of gas giants, these events seldom occur. During oblique and
moderately energetic collisions, the merger products retain higher fraction of
the colliders' cores than their envelopes. They can also deposit considerable
amount of spin angular momentum to the gas giants and desynchronize their spins
from their orbital mean motion. We find that the oblateness of gas giants can
be used to infer the impact history. Subsequent dissipation of stellar tide
inside the planets' envelope can lead to runaway inflation and potentially a
substantial loss of gas through Roche-lobe overflow. The impact of super-Earths
on parabolic orbits can also enlarge gas giant planets' envelope and elevates
their tidal dissipation rate over $\sim $ 100 Myr time scale. Since giant
impacts occur stochastically with a range of impactor sizes and energies, their
diverse outcomes may account for the dispersion in the mass-radius relationship
of hot Jupiters.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.7508 [pdf] - 1171716
Possible scenarios for eccentricity evolution in the extrasolar
planetary system HD 181433
Submitted: 2013-05-31
We analyse the dynamics of the multiple planet system HD 181433. This
consists of two gas giant planets (c and d) with msin i = 0.65 MJup and 0.53
MJup orbiting with periods 975 and 2468 days, respectively. The two planets
appear to be in a 5:2 mean motion resonance, as this is required for the system
to be dynamically stable. A third planet with mass m_b sin i = 0.023 MJup
orbits close to the star with orbital period 9.37 days. Each planet orbit is
significantly eccentric, with current values estimated to be e_b = 0.39, e_c =
0.27 and e_d = 0.47. In this paper we assess different scenarios that may
explain the origin of these eccentric orbits, with particular focus on the
innermost body, noting that the large eccentricity of planet b cannot be
explained through secular interaction with the outer pair. We consider a
scenario in which the system previously contained an additional giant planet
that was ejected during a period of dynamical instability among the planets.
N-body simulations are presented that demonstrate that during scattering and
ejection among the outer planets a close encounter between a giant and the
inner body can raise e_b to its observed value. We consider the possibility
that an undetected planet in the system increases the secular forcing of planet
b by the exterior giant planets, but we find that the resulting eccentricity is
not large enough to agree with the observed one. We also consider a scenario in
which the spin-down of the central star causes the system to pass through
secular resonance. Spin-down rates below the critical value lead to longterm
capture of planet b in secular resonance, driving the eccentricity toward
unity. If additional short-period low mass planets are present in the system,
however, we find that mutual scattering can release planet b from the secular
resonance, leading to a system with orbital parameters similar to those
observed today.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.2728 [pdf] - 1092330
EChO - Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory
Tinetti, G.;
Beaulieu, J. P.;
Henning, T.;
Meyer, M.;
Micela, G.;
Ribas, I.;
Stam, D.;
Swain, M.;
Krause, O.;
Ollivier, M.;
Pace, E.;
Swinyard, B.;
Aylward, A.;
van Boekel, R.;
Coradini, A.;
Encrenaz, T.;
Snellen, I.;
Zapatero-Osorio, M. R.;
Bouwman, J.;
Cho, J. Y-K.;
Foresto, V. Coudé du;
Guillot, T.;
Lopez-Morales, M.;
Mueller-Wodarg, I.;
Palle, E.;
Selsis, F.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
Achilleos, N.;
Adriani, A.;
Agnor, C. B.;
Afonso, C.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Bakos, G.;
Barber, R. J.;
Barlow, M.;
Bernath, P.;
Bezard, B.;
Bordé, P.;
Brown, L. R.;
Cassan, A.;
Cavarroc, C.;
Ciaravella, A.;
Cockell, C. O. U.;
Coustenis, A.;
Danielski, C.;
Decin, L.;
De Kok, R.;
Demangeon, O.;
Deroo, P.;
Doel, P.;
Drossart, P.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Focardi, M.;
Forget, F.;
Fossey, S.;
Fouqué, P.;
Frith, J.;
Galand, M.;
Gaulme, P.;
Hernández, J. I. González;
Grasset, O.;
Grassi, D.;
Grenfell, J. L.;
Griffin, M. J.;
Griffith, C. A.;
Grözinger, U.;
Guedel, M.;
Guio, P.;
Hainaut, O.;
Hargreaves, R.;
Hauschildt, P. H.;
Heng, K.;
Heyrovsky, D.;
Hueso, R.;
Irwin, P.;
Kaltenegger, L.;
Kervella, P.;
Kipping, D.;
Koskinen, T. T.;
Kovács, G.;
La Barbera, A.;
Lammer, H.;
Lellouch, E.;
Leto, G.;
Morales, M. Lopez;
Valverde, M. A. Lopez;
Lopez-Puertas, M.;
Lovis, C.;
Maggio, A.;
Maillard, J. P.;
Prado, J. Maldonado;
Marquette, J. B.;
Martin-Torres, F. J.;
Maxted, P.;
Miller, S.;
Molinari, S.;
Montes, D.;
Moro-Martin, A.;
Moses, J. I.;
Mousis, O.;
Tuong, N. Nguyen;
Nelson, R.;
Orton, G. S.;
Pantin, E.;
Pascale, E.;
Pezzuto, S.;
Pinfield, D.;
Poretti, E.;
Prinja, R.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Rees, J. M.;
Reiners, A.;
Samuel, B.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Forcada, J. Sanz;
Sasselov, D.;
Savini, G.;
Sicardy, B.;
Smith, A.;
Stixrude, L.;
Strazzulla, G.;
Tennyson, J.;
Tessenyi, M.;
Vasisht, G.;
Vinatier, S.;
Viti, S.;
Waldmann, I.;
White, G. J.;
Widemann, T.;
Wordsworth, R.;
Yelle, R.;
Yung, Y.;
Yurchenko, S. N.
Submitted: 2011-12-12
A dedicated mission to investigate exoplanetary atmospheres represents a
major milestone in our quest to understand our place in the universe by placing
our Solar System in context and by addressing the suitability of planets for
the presence of life. EChO -the Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory- is a
mission concept specifically geared for this purpose. EChO will provide
simultaneous, multi-wavelength spectroscopic observations on a stable platform
that will allow very long exposures. EChO will build on observations by Hubble,
Spitzer and groundbased telescopes, which discovered the first molecules and
atoms in exoplanetary atmospheres. EChO will simultaneously observe a broad
enough spectral region -from the visible to the mid-IR- to constrain from one
single spectrum the temperature structure of the atmosphere and the abundances
of the major molecular species. The spectral range and resolution are tailored
to separate bands belonging to up to 30 molecules to retrieve the composition
and temperature structure of planetary atmospheres. The target list for EChO
includes planets ranging from Jupiter-sized with equilibrium temperatures Teq
up to 2000 K, to those of a few Earth masses, with Teq ~300 K. We have
baselined a dispersive spectrograph design covering continuously the 0.4-16
micron spectral range in 6 channels (1 in the VIS, 5 in the IR), which allows
the spectral resolution to be adapted from several tens to several hundreds,
depending on the target brightness. The instrument will be mounted behind a 1.5
m class telescope, passively cooled to 50 K, with the instrument structure and
optics passively cooled to ~45 K. EChO will be placed in a grand halo orbit
around L2. We have also undertaken a first-order cost and development plan
analysis and find that EChO is easily compatible with the ESA M-class mission
framework.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.5042 [pdf] - 1085077
On the Migration of Jupiter and Saturn: Constraints from Linear Models
of Secular Resonant Coupling with the Terrestrial Planets
Submitted: 2011-10-23, last modified: 2011-11-10
We examine how the late divergent migration of Jupiter and Saturn may have
perturbed the terrestrial planets. We identify six secular resonances between
the nu_5 apsidal eigenfrequency of Jupiter and Saturn and the four
eigenfrequencies of the terrestrial planets (g_{1-4}). We derive analytic upper
limits on the eccentricity and orbital migration timescale of Jupiter and
Saturn when these resonances were encountered to avoid perturbing the
eccentricities of the terrestrial planets to values larger than the observed
ones. If Jupiter and Saturn migrated with eccentricities comparable to their
present day values, smooth migration with exponential timescales characteristic
of planetesimal-driven migration (\tau~5-10 Myr) would have perturbed the
eccentricities of the terrestrial planets to values greatly exceeding the
observed ones. This excitation may be mitigated if the eccentricity of Jupiter
was small during the migration epoch, migration was very rapid (e.g. \tau<~ 0.5
Myr perhaps via planet-planet scattering or instability-driven migration) or
the observed small eccentricity amplitudes of the j=2,3 terrestrial modes
result from low probability cancellation of several large amplitude
contributions. Further, results of orbital integrations show that very short
migration timescales (\tau<0.5 Myr), characteristic of instability-driven
migration, may also perturb the terrestrial planets' eccentricities by amounts
comparable to their observed values. We discuss the implications of these
constraints for the relative timing of terrestrial planet formation, giant
planet migration, and the origin of the so-called Late Heavy Bombardment of the
Moon 3.9+/-0.1 Ga ago. We suggest that the simplest way to satisfy these
dynamical constraints may be for the bulk of any giant planet migration to be
complete in the first 30-100 Myr of solar system history.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.4722 [pdf] - 1033939
Embryo impacts and gas giant mergers I: Dichotomy of Jupiter and
Saturn's core mass
Submitted: 2010-07-27
Interior to the gaseous envelopes of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, there are
high-density cores with masses larger than 10 Earth masses. According to the
conventional sequential accretion hypothesis, such massive cores are needed for
the onset of efficient accretion of their gaseous envelopes. However, Jupiter's
gaseous envelope is more massive and core may be less massive than those of
Saturn. In order to account for this structural diversity and the super-solar
metallicity in the envelope of Jupiter and Saturn, we investigate the
possibility that they may have either merged with other gas giants or consumed
several Earth-mass proto-planetary embryos during or after the rapid accretion
of their envelope. In general, impinging sub-Earth-mass planetesimals
disintegrate in gas giants' envelopes deposit heavy elements well outside the
cores and locally suppress the convection. Consequently, their fragments
sediment to promote the growth of cores. Through a series of numerical
simulations, we show that it is possible for colliding super-Earth-mass embryos
to reach the cores of gas giants. Direct parabolic collisions also lead to the
coalescence of gas giants and merging of their cores. In these cases, the
energy released from the impact leads to vigorous convective motion throughout
the envelope and the erosion of the cores. This dichotomy contributes to the
observed dispersion in the internal structure and atmospheric composition
between Jupiter and Saturn and other gas giant planets and elsewhere.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.1369 [pdf] - 1018273
Three-Body Capture of Irregular Satellites: Application to Jupiter
Submitted: 2009-11-06
We investigate a new theory of the origin of the irregular satellites of the
giant planets: capture of one member of a ~100-km binary asteroid after tidal
disruption. The energy loss from disruption is sufficient for capture, but it
cannot deliver the bodies directly to the observed orbits of the irregular
satellites. Instead, the long-lived capture orbits subsequently evolve inward
due to interactions with a tenuous circumplanetary gas disk.
We focus on the capture by Jupiter, which, due to its large mass, provides
the most stringent test of our model. We investigate the possible fates of
disrupted bodies, the differences between prograde and retrograde captures, and
the effects of Callisto on captured objects. We make an impulse approximation
and discuss how it allows us to generalize capture results from equal-mass
binaries to binaries with arbitrary mass ratios.
We find that at Jupiter, binaries offer an increase of a factor of ~10 in the
capture rate of 100-km objects as compared to single bodies, for objects
separated by tens of radii that approach the planet on relatively low-energy
trajectories. These bodies are at risk of collision with Callisto, but may be
preserved by gas drag if their pericenters are raised quickly enough. We
conclude that our mechanism is as capable of producing large irregular
satellites as previous suggestions, and it avoids several problems faced by
alternative models.