sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Adelberger, E. G.

Normalized to: Adelberger, E.

11 article(s) in total. 353 co-authors, from 1 to 5 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1902.04246  [pdf] - 1901809
Constraints on axionlike dark matter with masses down to $10^{-23}$ eV/c$^2$
Comments: Submitted December 20th, 2018 to PRL; Revised exclusion figure to show stellar and other experimental constraints
Submitted: 2019-02-12, last modified: 2019-05-28
We analyzed an 6.7-year span of data from a rotating torsion-pendulum containing $\approx 10^{23}$ polarized electrons to search for the "wind" arising from ultralight, axionlike dark matter with masses between $10^{-23}$ and $10^{-18}$ eV/c$^2$. Over most of this range we obtain a 95\% confidence limit $F_{\rm a}/C_{\rm e} \geq 1 \times 10^{15}$ eV on the axionlike decay constant.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1707.04591  [pdf] - 1585955
US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report
Battaglieri, Marco; Belloni, Alberto; Chou, Aaron; Cushman, Priscilla; Echenard, Bertrand; Essig, Rouven; Estrada, Juan; Feng, Jonathan L.; Flaugher, Brenna; Fox, Patrick J.; Graham, Peter; Hall, Carter; Harnik, Roni; Hewett, JoAnne; Incandela, Joseph; Izaguirre, Eder; McKinsey, Daniel; Pyle, Matthew; Roe, Natalie; Rybka, Gray; Sikivie, Pierre; Tait, Tim M. P.; Toro, Natalia; Van De Water, Richard; Weiner, Neal; Zurek, Kathryn; Adelberger, Eric; Afanasev, Andrei; Alexander, Derbin; Alexander, James; Antochi, Vasile Cristian; Asner, David Mark; Baer, Howard; Banerjee, Dipanwita; Baracchini, Elisabetta; Barbeau, Phillip; Barrow, Joshua; Bastidon, Noemie; Battat, James; Benson, Stephen; Berlin, Asher; Bird, Mark; Blinov, Nikita; Boddy, Kimberly K.; Bondi, Mariangela; Bonivento, Walter M.; Boulay, Mark; Boyce, James; Brodeur, Maxime; Broussard, Leah; Budnik, Ranny; Bunting, Philip; Caffee, Marc; Caiazza, Sabato Stefano; Campbell, Sheldon; Cao, Tongtong; Carosi, Gianpaolo; Carpinelli, Massimo; Cavoto, Gianluca; Celentano, Andrea; Chang, Jae Hyeok; Chattopadhyay, Swapan; Chavarria, Alvaro; Chen, Chien-Yi; Clark, Kenneth; Clarke, John; Colegrove, Owen; Coleman, Jonathon; Cooke, David; Cooper, Robert; Crisler, Michael; Crivelli, Paolo; D'Eramo, Francesco; D'Urso, Domenico; Dahl, Eric; Dawson, William; De Napoli, Marzio; De Vita, Raffaella; DeNiverville, Patrick; Derenzo, Stephen; Di Crescenzo, Antonia; Di Marco, Emanuele; Dienes, Keith R.; Diwan, Milind; Dongwi, Dongwi Handiipondola; Drlica-Wagner, Alex; Ellis, Sebastian; Ezeribe, Anthony Chigbo; Farrar, Glennys; Ferrer, Francesc; Figueroa-Feliciano, Enectali; Filippi, Alessandra; Fiorillo, Giuliana; Fornal, Bartosz; Freyberger, Arne; Frugiuele, Claudia; Galbiati, Cristian; Galon, Iftah; Gardner, Susan; Geraci, Andrew; Gerbier, Gilles; Graham, Mathew; Gschwendtner, Edda; Hearty, Christopher; Heise, Jaret; Henning, Reyco; Hill, Richard J.; Hitlin, David; Hochberg, Yonit; Hogan, Jason; Holtrop, Maurik; Hong, Ziqing; Hossbach, Todd; Humensky, T. B.; Ilten, Philip; Irwin, Kent; Jaros, John; Johnson, Robert; Jones, Matthew; Kahn, Yonatan; Kalantarians, Narbe; Kaplinghat, Manoj; Khatiwada, Rakshya; Knapen, Simon; Kohl, Michael; Kouvaris, Chris; Kozaczuk, Jonathan; Krnjaic, Gordan; Kubarovsky, Valery; Kuflik, Eric; Kusenko, Alexander; Lang, Rafael; Leach, Kyle; Lin, Tongyan; Lisanti, Mariangela; Liu, Jing; Liu, Kun; Liu, Ming; Loomba, Dinesh; Lykken, Joseph; Mack, Katherine; Mans, Jeremiah; Maris, Humphrey; Markiewicz, Thomas; Marsicano, Luca; Martoff, C. J.; Mazzitelli, Giovanni; McCabe, Christopher; McDermott, Samuel D.; McDonald, Art; McKinnon, Bryan; Mei, Dongming; Melia, Tom; Miller, Gerald A.; Miuchi, Kentaro; Nazeer, Sahara Mohammed Prem; Moreno, Omar; Morozov, Vasiliy; Mouton, Frederic; Mueller, Holger; Murphy, Alexander; Neilson, Russell; Nelson, Tim; Neu, Christopher; Nosochkov, Yuri; O'Hare, Ciaran; Oblath, Noah; Orrell, John; Ouellet, Jonathan; Pastore, Saori; Paul, Sebouh; Perelstein, Maxim; Peter, Annika; Phan, Nguyen; Phinney, Nan; Pivovaroff, Michael; Pocar, Andrea; Pospelov, Maxim; Pradler, Josef; Privitera, Paolo; Profumo, Stefano; Raggi, Mauro; Rajendran, Surjeet; Randazzo, Nunzio; Raubenheimer, Tor; Regenfus, Christian; Renshaw, Andrew; Ritz, Adam; Rizzo, Thomas; Rosenberg, Leslie; Rubbia, Andre; Rybolt, Ben; Saab, Tarek; Safdi, Benjamin R.; Santopinto, Elena; Scarff, Andrew; Schneider, Michael; Schuster, Philip; Seidel, George; Sekiya, Hiroyuki; Seong, Ilsoo; Simi, Gabriele; Sipala, Valeria; Slatyer, Tracy; Slone, Oren; Smith, Peter F; Smolinsky, Jordan; Snowden-Ifft, Daniel; Solt, Matthew; Sonnenschein, Andrew; Sorensen, Peter; Spooner, Neil; Srivastava, Brijesh; Stancu, Ion; Strigari, Louis; Strube, Jan; Sushkov, Alexander O.; Szydagis, Matthew; Tanedo, Philip; Tanner, David; Tayloe, Rex; Terrano, William; Thaler, Jesse; Thomas, Brooks; Thorpe, Brianna; Thorpe, Thomas; Tiffenberg, Javier; Tran, Nhan; Trovato, Marco; Tully, Christopher; Tyson, Tony; Vachaspati, Tanmay; Vahsen, Sven; van Bibber, Karl; Vandenbroucke, Justin; Villano, Anthony; Volansky, Tomer; Wang, Guojian; Ward, Thomas; Wester, William; Whitbeck, Andrew; Williams, David A.; Wing, Matthew; Winslow, Lindley; Wojtsekhowski, Bogdan; Yu, Hai-Bo; Yu, Shin-Shan; Yu, Tien-Tien; Zhang, Xilin; Zhao, Yue; Zhong, Yi-Ming
Comments: 102 pages + references
Submitted: 2017-07-14
This white paper summarizes the workshop "U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter" held at University of Maryland on March 23-25, 2017.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1706.09550  [pdf] - 1598075
An absolute calibration system for millimeter-accuracy APOLLO measurements
Comments: 21 pages, 10 figures, submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity
Submitted: 2017-06-28
Lunar laser ranging provides a number of leading experimental tests of gravitation -- important in our quest to unify General Relativity and the Standard Model of physics. The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) has for years achieved median range precision at the ~2 mm level. Yet residuals in model-measurement comparisons are an order-of-magnitude larger, raising the question of whether the ranging data are not nearly as accurate as they are precise, or if the models are incomplete or ill-conditioned. This paper describes a new absolute calibration system (ACS) intended both as a tool for exposing and eliminating sources of systematic error, and also as a means to directly calibrate ranging data in-situ. The system consists of a high-repetition-rate (80 MHz) laser emitting short (< 10 ps) pulses that are locked to a cesium clock. In essence, the ACS delivers photons to the APOLLO detector at exquisitely well-defined time intervals as a "truth" input against which APOLLO's timing performance may be judged and corrected. Preliminary analysis indicates no inaccuracies in APOLLO data beyond the ~3 mm level, suggesting that historical APOLLO data are of high quality and motivating continued work on model capabilities. The ACS provides the means to deliver APOLLO data both accurate and precise below the 2 mm level.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1009.5720  [pdf] - 723020
Laser Ranging to the Lost Lunokhod~1 Reflector
Comments: 11 pages, 1 figure (color), submitted to Icarus; revision addresses reviewer comments
Submitted: 2010-09-28, last modified: 2010-11-04
In 1970, the Soviet Lunokhod 1 rover delivered a French-built laser reflector to the Moon. Although a few range measurements were made within three months of its landing, these measurements---and any that may have followed---are unpublished and unavailable. The Lunokhod 1 reflector was, therefore, effectively lost until March of 2010 when images from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) provided a positive identification of the rover and determined its coordinates with uncertainties of about 100 m. This allowed the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) to quickly acquire a laser signal. The reflector appears to be in excellent condition, delivering a signal roughly four times stronger than its twin reflector on the Lunokhod 2 rover. The Lunokhod 1 reflector is especially valuable for science because it is closer to the Moon's limb than any of the other reflectors and, unlike the Lunokhod 2 reflector, we find that it is usable during the lunar day. We report the selenographic position of the reflector to few-centimeter accuracy, comment on the health of the reflector, and illustrate the value of this reflector for achieving science goals.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:1004.2318  [pdf] - 669480
Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles
Comments: 54 pages, 20 figures, version to be published in Reviews of Modern Physics; various typos corrected and several updates made
Submitted: 2010-04-14, last modified: 2010-10-10
We summarize and critically evaluate the available data on nuclear fusion cross sections important to energy generation in the Sun and other hydrogen-burning stars and to solar neutrino production. Recommended values and uncertainties are provided for key cross sections, and a recommended spectrum is given for 8B solar neutrinos. We also discuss opportunities for further increasing the precision of key rates, including new facilities, new experimental techniques, and improvements in theory. This review, which summarizes the conclusions of a workshop held at the Institute for Nuclear Theory, Seattle, in January 2009, is intended as a 10-year update and supplement to Reviews of Modern Physics 70 (1998) 1265.
[6]  oai:arXiv.org:1003.0713  [pdf] - 723018
Long-term degradation of optical devices on the moon
Comments: 9 pages; 4 figures; accepted for publication in Icarus
Submitted: 2010-03-02
Forty years ago, Apollo astronauts placed the first of several retroreflector arrays on the lunar surface. Their continued usefulness for laser-ranging might suggest that the lunar environment does not damage optical devices. However, new laser ranging data reveal that the efficiency of the three Apollo reflector arrays is now diminished by a factor of ten at all lunar phases and by an additional factor of ten when the lunar phase is near full moon. These deficits did not exist in the earliest years of lunar ranging, indicating that the lunar environment damages optical equipment on the timescale of decades. Dust or abrasion on the front faces of the corner-cube prisms may be responsible, reducing their reflectivity and degrading their thermal performance when exposed to face-on sunlight at full moon. These mechanisms can be tested using laboratory simulations and must be understood before designing equipment destined for the moon.
[7]  oai:arXiv.org:0710.0890  [pdf] - 554023
APOLLO: the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation: Instrument Description and First Detections
Comments: 37 pages; 10 figures; 1 table: accepted for publication in PASP
Submitted: 2007-10-03, last modified: 2007-11-07
A next-generation lunar laser ranging apparatus using the 3.5 m telescope at the Apache Point Observatory in southern New Mexico has begun science operation. APOLLO (the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation) has achieved one-millimeter range precision to the moon which should lead to approximately one-order-of-magnitude improvements in the precision of several tests of fundamental properties of gravity. We briefly motivate the scientific goals, and then give a detailed discussion of the APOLLO instrumentation.
[8]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0307284  [pdf] - 114495
Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law
Comments: 81 pages, 10 figures, submitted by permission of the Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. Final version of this material is scheduled to appear in the Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science Vol. 53, to be published in December 2003 by Annual Reviews, http://AnnualReviews.org
Submitted: 2003-07-22
We review recent experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law and the wide variety of theoretical considerations that suggest the law may break down in experimentally accessible regions.
[9]  oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0306245  [pdf] - 114475
Photon Mass Bound Destroyed by Vortices
Comments: 9 pages, discussion of primordial magnetic field added
Submitted: 2003-06-24, last modified: 2003-07-02
The Particle Data Group gives an upper bound on the photon mass $m < 2 \times 10^{-16}$eV from a laboratory experiment and lists, but does not adopt, an astronomical bound $m < 3 \times 10^{-27}$eV, both of which are based on the plausible assumption of large galactic vector-potential. We argue that the interpretations of these experiments should be changed, which alters significantly the bounds on $m$. If $m$ arises from a Higgs effect, both limits are invalid because the Proca vector-potential of the galactic magnetic field may be neutralized by vortices giving a large-scale magnetic field that is effectively Maxwellian. In this regime, experiments sensitive to the Proca potential do not yield a useful bound on $m$. As a by-product, the non-zero photon mass from Higgs effect predicts generation of a primordial magnetic field in the early universe. If, on the other hand, the galactic magnetic field is in the Proca regime, the very existence of the observed large-scale magnetic field gives $m^{-1}\gtrsim 1$kpc, or $m\lesssim 10^{-26}$eV.
[10]  oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0111014  [pdf] - 118435
7Be(p,gamma)8B astrophysical S-factor from precision cross section measurements
Comments: 4 pages, 4 figures
Submitted: 2001-11-16
We measured the 7Be(p,gamma)8B cross section from E_cm = 186 to 1200 keV, with a statistical-plus-systematic precision per point of better than +- 5%. All important systematic errors were measured including 8B backscattering losses. We obtain S_17(0) = 22.3 +- 0.7(expt) +- 0.5(theor) eV-b from our data at E_cm <= 300 keV and the theory of Descouvemont and Baye.
[11]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9805121  [pdf] - 101342
Solar Fusion Cross Sections
Comments: LaTeX file, 48 pages (figures not included). To appear in Rev. Mod. Phys., 10/98. All authors now listed. Full postscript version with figures available at http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb/Papers/Preprints/nuclearfusion.html
Submitted: 1998-05-11, last modified: 1998-05-12
We review and analyze the available information for nuclear fusion cross sections that are most important for solar energy generation and solar neutrino production. We provide best values for the low-energy cross-section factors and, wherever possible, estimates of the uncertainties. We also describe the most important experiments and calculations that are required in order to improve our knowledge of solar fusion rates.