Normalized to: Adelberger, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.04246 [pdf] - 1901809
Constraints on axionlike dark matter with masses down to $10^{-23}$
eV/c$^2$
Submitted: 2019-02-12, last modified: 2019-05-28
We analyzed an 6.7-year span of data from a rotating torsion-pendulum
containing $\approx 10^{23}$ polarized electrons to search for the "wind"
arising from ultralight, axionlike dark matter with masses between $10^{-23}$
and $10^{-18}$ eV/c$^2$. Over most of this range we obtain a 95\% confidence
limit $F_{\rm a}/C_{\rm e} \geq 1 \times 10^{15}$ eV on the axionlike decay
constant.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09550 [pdf] - 1598075
An absolute calibration system for millimeter-accuracy APOLLO
measurements
Adelberger, E. G.;
Battat, J. B. R.;
Birkmeier, K. J.;
Colmenares, N. R.;
Davis, R.;
Hoyle, C. D.;
Huang, L. R.;
McMillan, R. J.;
Murphy, T. W.;
Schlerman, E.;
Skrobol, C.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Zach, A.
Submitted: 2017-06-28
Lunar laser ranging provides a number of leading experimental tests of
gravitation -- important in our quest to unify General Relativity and the
Standard Model of physics. The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging
Operation (APOLLO) has for years achieved median range precision at the ~2 mm
level. Yet residuals in model-measurement comparisons are an order-of-magnitude
larger, raising the question of whether the ranging data are not nearly as
accurate as they are precise, or if the models are incomplete or
ill-conditioned. This paper describes a new absolute calibration system (ACS)
intended both as a tool for exposing and eliminating sources of systematic
error, and also as a means to directly calibrate ranging data in-situ. The
system consists of a high-repetition-rate (80 MHz) laser emitting short (< 10
ps) pulses that are locked to a cesium clock. In essence, the ACS delivers
photons to the APOLLO detector at exquisitely well-defined time intervals as a
"truth" input against which APOLLO's timing performance may be judged and
corrected. Preliminary analysis indicates no inaccuracies in APOLLO data beyond
the ~3 mm level, suggesting that historical APOLLO data are of high quality and
motivating continued work on model capabilities. The ACS provides the means to
deliver APOLLO data both accurate and precise below the 2 mm level.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.5720 [pdf] - 723020
Laser Ranging to the Lost Lunokhod~1 Reflector
Submitted: 2010-09-28, last modified: 2010-11-04
In 1970, the Soviet Lunokhod 1 rover delivered a French-built laser reflector
to the Moon. Although a few range measurements were made within three months of
its landing, these measurements---and any that may have followed---are
unpublished and unavailable. The Lunokhod 1 reflector was, therefore,
effectively lost until March of 2010 when images from the Lunar Reconnaissance
Orbiter (LRO) provided a positive identification of the rover and determined
its coordinates with uncertainties of about 100 m. This allowed the Apache
Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation (APOLLO) to quickly acquire a
laser signal. The reflector appears to be in excellent condition, delivering a
signal roughly four times stronger than its twin reflector on the Lunokhod 2
rover. The Lunokhod 1 reflector is especially valuable for science because it
is closer to the Moon's limb than any of the other reflectors and, unlike the
Lunokhod 2 reflector, we find that it is usable during the lunar day. We report
the selenographic position of the reflector to few-centimeter accuracy, comment
on the health of the reflector, and illustrate the value of this reflector for
achieving science goals.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2318 [pdf] - 669480
Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles
Adelberger, E. G.;
Balantekin, A. B.;
Bemmerer, D.;
Bertulani, C. A.;
Chen, J. -W.;
Costantini, H.;
Couder, M.;
Cyburt, R.;
Davids, B.;
Freedman, S. J.;
Gai, M.;
Garcia, A.;
Gazit, D.;
Gialanella, L.;
Greife, U.;
Hass, M.;
Heeger, K.;
Haxton, W. C.;
Imbriani, G.;
Itahashi, T.;
Junghans, A.;
Kubodera, K.;
Langanke, K.;
Leitner, D.;
Leitner, M.;
Marcucci, L. E.;
Motobayashi, T.;
Mukhamedzhanov, A.;
Nollett, Kenneth M.;
Nunes, F. M.;
Park, T. -S.;
Parker, P. D.;
Prati, P.;
Ramsey-Musolf, M. J.;
Robertson, R. G. Hamish;
Schiavilla, R.;
Simpson, E. C.;
Snover, K. A.;
Spitaleri, C.;
Strieder, F.;
Suemmerer, K.;
Trautvetter, H. -P.;
Tribble, R. E.;
Typel, S.;
Uberseder, E.;
Vetter, P.;
Wiescher, M.;
Winslow, L.
Submitted: 2010-04-14, last modified: 2010-10-10
We summarize and critically evaluate the available data on nuclear fusion
cross sections important to energy generation in the Sun and other
hydrogen-burning stars and to solar neutrino production. Recommended values and
uncertainties are provided for key cross sections, and a recommended spectrum
is given for 8B solar neutrinos. We also discuss opportunities for further
increasing the precision of key rates, including new facilities, new
experimental techniques, and improvements in theory. This review, which
summarizes the conclusions of a workshop held at the Institute for Nuclear
Theory, Seattle, in January 2009, is intended as a 10-year update and
supplement to Reviews of Modern Physics 70 (1998) 1265.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0713 [pdf] - 723018
Long-term degradation of optical devices on the moon
Murphy,, T. W.;
Adelberger, E. G.;
Battat, J. B. R.;
Hoyle, C. D.;
McMillan, R. J.;
Michelsen, E. L.;
Samad, R.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Swanson, H. E.
Submitted: 2010-03-02
Forty years ago, Apollo astronauts placed the first of several retroreflector
arrays on the lunar surface. Their continued usefulness for laser-ranging might
suggest that the lunar environment does not damage optical devices. However,
new laser ranging data reveal that the efficiency of the three Apollo reflector
arrays is now diminished by a factor of ten at all lunar phases and by an
additional factor of ten when the lunar phase is near full moon. These deficits
did not exist in the earliest years of lunar ranging, indicating that the lunar
environment damages optical equipment on the timescale of decades. Dust or
abrasion on the front faces of the corner-cube prisms may be responsible,
reducing their reflectivity and degrading their thermal performance when
exposed to face-on sunlight at full moon. These mechanisms can be tested using
laboratory simulations and must be understood before designing equipment
destined for the moon.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.0890 [pdf] - 554023
APOLLO: the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation:
Instrument Description and First Detections
Murphy,, T. W.;
Adelberger, E. G.;
Battat, J. B. R.;
Carey, L. N.;
Hoyle, C. D.;
LeBlanc, P.;
Michelsen, E. L.;
Nordtvedt, K.;
Orin, A. E.;
Strasburg, J. D.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Swanson, H. E.;
Williams, E.
Submitted: 2007-10-03, last modified: 2007-11-07
A next-generation lunar laser ranging apparatus using the 3.5 m telescope at
the Apache Point Observatory in southern New Mexico has begun science
operation. APOLLO (the Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-ranging Operation)
has achieved one-millimeter range precision to the moon which should lead to
approximately one-order-of-magnitude improvements in the precision of several
tests of fundamental properties of gravity. We briefly motivate the scientific
goals, and then give a detailed discussion of the APOLLO instrumentation.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0307284 [pdf] - 114495
Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law
Submitted: 2003-07-22
We review recent experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law
and the wide variety of theoretical considerations that suggest the law may
break down in experimentally accessible regions.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0306245 [pdf] - 114475
Photon Mass Bound Destroyed by Vortices
Submitted: 2003-06-24, last modified: 2003-07-02
The Particle Data Group gives an upper bound on the photon mass $m < 2 \times
10^{-16}$eV from a laboratory experiment and lists, but does not adopt, an
astronomical bound $m < 3 \times 10^{-27}$eV, both of which are based on the
plausible assumption of large galactic vector-potential. We argue that the
interpretations of these experiments should be changed, which alters
significantly the bounds on $m$. If $m$ arises from a Higgs effect, both limits
are invalid because the Proca vector-potential of the galactic magnetic field
may be neutralized by vortices giving a large-scale magnetic field that is
effectively Maxwellian. In this regime, experiments sensitive to the Proca
potential do not yield a useful bound on $m$. As a by-product, the non-zero
photon mass from Higgs effect predicts generation of a primordial magnetic
field in the early universe. If, on the other hand, the galactic magnetic field
is in the Proca regime, the very existence of the observed large-scale magnetic
field gives $m^{-1}\gtrsim 1$kpc, or $m\lesssim 10^{-26}$eV.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0111014 [pdf] - 118435
7Be(p,gamma)8B astrophysical S-factor from precision cross section
measurements
Junghans, A. R.;
Mohrmann, E. C.;
Snover, K. A.;
Steiger, T. D.;
Adelberger, E. G.;
Casandjian, J. -M.;
Swanson, H. E.;
Buchmann, L.;
Park, S. H.;
Zyuzin, A.
Submitted: 2001-11-16
We measured the 7Be(p,gamma)8B cross section from E_cm = 186 to 1200 keV,
with a statistical-plus-systematic precision per point of better than +- 5%.
All important systematic errors were measured including 8B backscattering
losses. We obtain S_17(0) = 22.3 +- 0.7(expt) +- 0.5(theor) eV-b from our data
at E_cm <= 300 keV and the theory of Descouvemont and Baye.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9805121 [pdf] - 101342
Solar Fusion Cross Sections
Adelberger, E.;
Austin, S.;
Bahcall, J.;
Balantekin, A.;
Bogaert, G.;
Brown, L.;
Buchmann, L.;
Cecil, F.;
Champagne, A.;
de Braeckeleer, L.;
Duba, C.;
Elliott, S.;
Freedman, S.;
Gai, M.;
Goldring, G.;
Gould, C.;
Gruzinov, A.;
Haxton, W.;
Heeger, K.;
Henley, E.;
Johnson, C.;
Kamionkowski, M.;
Kavanagh, R.;
Koonin, S.;
Kubodera, K.;
Langanke, K.;
Motobayashi, T.;
Pandharipande, V.;
Parker, P.;
Robertson, R.;
Rolfs, C.;
Sawyer, R.;
Shaviv, N.;
Shoppa, T.;
Snover, K.;
Swanson, E.;
Tribble, R.;
Turck-Chieze, S.;
Wilkerson, J.
Submitted: 1998-05-11, last modified: 1998-05-12
We review and analyze the available information for nuclear fusion cross
sections that are most important for solar energy generation and solar neutrino
production. We provide best values for the low-energy cross-section factors
and, wherever possible, estimates of the uncertainties. We also describe the
most important experiments and calculations that are required in order to
improve our knowledge of solar fusion rates.