Normalized to: Abedi, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.09553 [pdf] - 2037627
Quantum Black Holes in the Sky
Submitted: 2020-01-24
Black Holes are possibly the most enigmatic objects in our Universe. From
their detection in gravitational waves upon their mergers, to their snapshot
eating at the centres of galaxies, black hole astrophysics has undergone an
observational renaissance in the past 4 years. Nevertheless, they remain active
playgrounds for strong gravity and quantum effects, where novel aspects of the
elusive theory of quantum gravity may be hard at work. In this review article,
we provide an overview of the strong motivations for why "Quantum Black Holes"
may be radically different from their classical counterparts in Einstein's
General Relativity. We then discuss the observational signatures of quantum
black holes, focusing on gravitational wave echoes as smoking guns for quantum
horizons (or exotic compact objects), which have led to significant recent
excitement and activity. We review the theoretical underpinning of
gravitational wave echoes and critically examine the seemingly contradictory
observational claims regarding their (non-)existence. Finally, we discuss the
future theoretical and observational landscape for unraveling the "Quantum
Black Holes in the Sky".
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.10454 [pdf] - 2022346
Echoes from the Abyss: A highly spinning black hole remnant for the
binary neutron star merger GW170817
Submitted: 2018-03-28, last modified: 2020-01-05
The first direct observation of a binary neutron star (BNS) merger was a
watershed moment in multi-messenger astronomy. However, gravitational waves
from GW170817 have only been observed prior to the BNS merger, but
electromagnetic observations all follow the merger event. While post-merger
gravitational wave signal in general relativity is too faint (given current
detector sensitivities), here we present the first tentative detection of
post-merger gravitational wave "echoes" from a highly spinning "black hole"
remnant. The echoes may be expected in different models of quantum black holes
that replace event horizons by exotic Planck-scale structure and tentative
evidence for them has been found in binary black hole merger events. The fact
that the echo frequency is suppressed by $\log M$ (in Planck units) puts it
squarely in the LIGO sensitivity window, allowing us to build an optimal
model-agnostic search strategy via cross-correlating the two detectors in
frequency/time. We find a tentative detection of echoes at $f_{\rm echo} \simeq
72$ Hz, around 1.0 sec after the BNS merger, consistent with a 2.6-2.7
$M_\odot$ "black hole" remnant with dimensionless spin $0.84-0.87$. Accounting
for all the "look-elsewhere" effects, we find a significance of $4.2 \sigma$,
or a false alarm probability of $1.6\times 10^{-5}$, i.e. a similar
cross-correlation within the expected frequency/time window after the merger
cannot be found more than 4 times in 3 days. If confirmed, this finding will
have significant consequences for both physics of quantum black holes and
astrophysics of binary neutron star mergers [Note added: This result is
independently confirmed by arXiv:1901.04138, who use the electromagnetic
observations to infer $t_{\rm coll}=0.98^{+0.31}_{-0.26}$ sec for black hole
formation].
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.00821 [pdf] - 2021932
Echoes from the Abyss: A Status Update
Submitted: 2020-01-03
Gravitational wave echoes provide our most direct and surprising
observational window into quantum nature of black holes. Three years ago, the
first search for echoes from Planck-scale modifications of general relativity
near black hole event horizons led to tentative evidence at false detection
probability of 1\% arXiv:1612.00266 . The study introduced a naive
phenomenological model and used the public data release by the Advanced LIGO
gravitational wave observatory for the first observing run O1 (GW150914,
GW151226, and LVT151012, now GW151012). Here, we provide a status update on
various observational searches for echoes by independent groups, and argue that
they can all be consistent if echoes are most prominent at lower frequencies
and/or in binary mergers of more extreme mass ratio. We also point out that the
only reported "detection" of echoes (with $>4\sigma$ confidence) at 1.0 second
after the binary neutron star merger GW170817 arXiv:1803.10454 is coincident
with the formation time of the black hole inferred from electromagnetic
observations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.08565 [pdf] - 1654574
Comment on: "Low significance of evidence for black hole echoes in
gravitational wave data"
Submitted: 2018-03-22
In a recent publication (1612.00266), we demonstrated that the events in the
first observing run of the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory (aLIGO
O1) showed tentative evidence for repeating "echoes from the abyss" caused by
Planck-scale structure near black hole horizons. By considering a
phenomenological echo model, we showed that the pure noise hypothesis is
disfavored with a p-value of 1%, i.e. higher amplitude for echoes than those in
aLIGO O1 events are only recovered in 1% of random noise realizations. A recent
preprint by Westerweck, et al. (1712.09966) provides a careful re-evaluation of
our analysis which claims "a reduced statistical significance ... entirely
consistent with noise". It is a mystery to us why the authors make such a
statement, while they also find a p-value of 2 $\pm$ 1% (given the Poisson
error in their estimate) for the same model and dataset. This is p-erfectly
consistent with our results, which would be commonly considered as disfavoring
the null hypothesis, or "moderate to significant" evidence for "echoes".
Westerweck, et al. also point to diversity of the observed echo properties as
evidence for statistical fluke, but such a diversity is neither unique nor
surprising for complex physical phenomena in nature.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.00266 [pdf] - 1580771
Echoes from the Abyss: Tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure at
black hole horizons
Submitted: 2016-12-01, last modified: 2017-10-03
In classical General Relativity (GR), an observer falling into an
astrophysical black hole is not expected to experience anything dramatic as she
crosses the event horizon. However, tentative resolutions to problems in
quantum gravity, such as the cosmological constant problem, or the black hole
information paradox, invoke significant departures from classicality in the
vicinity of the horizon. It was recently pointed out that such near-horizon
structures can lead to late-time echoes in the black hole merger gravitational
wave signals that are otherwise indistinguishable from GR. We search for
observational signatures of these echoes in the gravitational wave data
released by advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
(LIGO), following the three black hole merger events GW150914, GW151226, and
LVT151012. In particular, we look for repeating damped echoes with time-delays
of $8 M \log M$ (+spin corrections, in Planck units), corresponding to
Planck-scale departures from GR near their respective horizons. Accounting for
the "look elsewhere" effect due to uncertainty in the echo template, we find
tentative evidence for Planck-scale structure near black hole horizons at false
detection probability of $1\%$ (corresponding to $2.5\sigma$ significance
level). Future observations from interferometric detectors at higher
sensitivity, along with more physical echo templates, will be able to confirm
(or rule out) this finding, providing possible empirical evidence for
alternatives to classical black holes, such as in ${\it firewall}$ or ${\it
fuzzball}$ paradigms.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.03485 [pdf] - 1534486
Echoes from the Abyss: The Holiday Edition!
Submitted: 2017-01-12
In a recent paper (arXiv:1612.00266), we reported the results of the first
search for echoes from Planck-scale modifications of general relativity near
black hole event horizons using the public data release by the Advanced LIGO
gravitational wave observatory. While we found tentative evidence (at $\simeq 3
\sigma$ level) for the presence of these echoes, our statistical methodology
was challenged by Ashton, et al. (arXiv:1612.05625), just in time for the
holidays! In this short note, we briefly address these criticisms, arguing that
they either do not affect our conclusion or change its significance by
$\lesssim 0.3\sigma$. The real test will be whether our finding can be
reproduced by independent groups using independent methodologies (and
ultimately more data).