sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Abbott, C.

Normalized to: Abbott, C.

3 article(s) in total. 62 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1703.07366  [pdf] - 1582057
On the orbits that generate the X-shape in the Milky Way bulge
Comments: 16 pages, 10 figures, Accepted for Publication in MNRAS
Submitted: 2017-03-21, last modified: 2017-05-25
The Milky Way bulge shows a box/peanut or X-shaped bulge (hereafter BP/X) when viewed in infrared or microwave bands. We examine orbits in an N-body model of a barred disk galaxy that is scaled to match the kinematics of the Milky Way (MW) bulge. We generate maps of projected stellar surface density, unsharp masked images, 3D excess-mass distributions (showing mass outside ellipsoids), line-of-sight number count distributions, and 2D line-of-sight kinematics for the simulation as well as co-added orbit families, in order to identify the orbits primarily responsible for the BP/X shape. We estimate that between 19-23\% of the mass of the bar is associated with the BP/X shape and that most bar orbits contribute to this shape which is clearly seen in projected surface density maps and 3D excess mass for non-resonant box orbits, "banana" orbits, "fish/pretzel" orbits and "brezel" orbits. {We find that nearly all bar orbit families contribute some mass to the 3D BP/X-shape. All co-added orbit families show a bifurcation in stellar number count distribution with heliocentric distance that resembles the bifurcation observed in red clump stars in the MW. However, only the box orbit family shows an increasing separation of peaks with increasing galactic latitude $|b|$, similar to that observed.} Our analysis shows that no single orbit family fully explains all the observed features associated with the MW's BP/X shaped bulge, but collectively the non-resonant boxes and various resonant boxlet orbits contribute at different distances from the center to produce this feature. We propose that since box orbits have three incommensurable orbital fundamental frequencies, their 3-dimensional shapes are highly flexible and, like Lissajous figures, this family of orbits is most easily able to adapt to evolution in the shape of the underlying potential.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.03467  [pdf] - 1370293
A unified framework for the orbital structure of bars and triaxial ellipsoids
Comments: 23 pages, 16 figures, under review at ApJ. PDF with high resolution figures available at http://dept.astro.lsa.umich.edu/~mvalluri/preprints.html
Submitted: 2015-12-10
We examine a large random sample of orbits in self-consistent simulations of N-body bars. Orbits in the bars are classified both visually and with a new automated orbit classification method based on frequency analysis. The well known prograde x1 orbit family originates from the same parent orbit as the box orbits in stationary and rotating triaxial ellipsoids. However only a small fraction of bar orbits ~4% have predominately prograde motion like their periodic parent orbit. Most bar orbits arising from the x1 orbit have little net angular momentum in the bar frame making them equivalent to box orbits in rotating triaxial potentials. A small fraction of bar orbits (~7%) are long axis tubes that behave exactly like those in triaxial ellipsoids:they are tipped about the intermediate-axis due to the Coriolis force, with the sense of tipping determined by the sign of their angular momentum about the long axis. No orbits parented by prograde periodic x2 orbits are found in the pure bar model, but a tiny population (~2%) of short axis tube orbits parented by retrograde x4 orbits are found. When a central point mass representing a supermassive black hole (SMBH) is grown adiabatically at the center of the bar, those orbits that lie in the immediate vicinity of the SMBH are transformed into precessing Keplerian orbits (PKOs) which belong the same major families (short axis tubes, long axis tubes and boxes) occupying the bar at larger radii. During the growth of a SMBH the inflow of mass and outward transport of angular momentum transforms some x1 and long axis tube orbits into prograde short axis tubes. This study has important implications for future attempts to constrain the masses of SMBHs in barred galaxies using orbit based methods like the Schwarzschild orbit superposition scheme and for understanding the observed features in barred galaxies.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1512.01032  [pdf] - 1443781
Physical properties of star clusters in the outer LMC as observed by the Dark Energy Survey
Comments: 41 pages, 16 figures, 1 appendix
Submitted: 2015-12-03
The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) harbors a rich and diverse system of star clusters, whose ages, chemical abundances, and positions provide information about the LMC history of star formation. We use Science Verification imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey to increase the census of known star clusters in the outer LMC and to derive physical parameters for a large sample of such objects using a spatially and photometrically homogeneous data set. Our sample contains 255 visually identified cluster candidates, of which 109 were not listed in any previous catalog. We quantify the crowding effect for the stellar sample produced by the DES Data Management pipeline and conclude that the stellar completeness is < 10% inside typical LMC cluster cores. We therefore develop a pipeline to sample and measure stellar magnitudes and positions around the cluster candidates using DAOPHOT. We also implement a maximum-likelihood method to fit individual density profiles and colour-magnitude diagrams. For 117 (from a total of 255) of the cluster candidates (28 uncatalogued clusters), we obtain reliable ages, metallicities, distance moduli and structural parameters, confirming their nature as physical systems. The distribution of cluster metallicities shows a radial dependence, with no clusters more metal-rich than [Fe/H] ~ -0.7 beyond 8 kpc from the LMC center. The age distribution has two peaks at ~ 1.2 Gyr and ~ 2.7 Gyr.