Normalized to: Abbey, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.5049 [pdf] - 1083624
Recovering Swift-XRT energy resolution through CCD charge trap mapping
Pagani, C.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Mountford, C.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Capalbi, M.;
Perri, M.;
Angelini, L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Campana, S.;
Cusumano, G.;
Evans, P. A.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Moretti, A.;
Page, K. L.;
Starling, R. L. C.
Submitted: 2011-08-25
The X-ray telescope on board the Swift satellite for gamma-ray burst
astronomy has been exposed to the radiation of the space environment since
launch in November 2004. Radiation causes damage to the detector, with the
generation of dark current and charge trapping sites that result in the
degradation of the spectral resolution and an increase of the instrumental
background. The Swift team has a dedicated calibration program with the goal of
recovering a significant proportion of the lost spectroscopic performance.
Calibration observations of supernova remnants with strong emission lines are
analysed to map the detector charge traps and to derive position-dependent
corrections to the measured photon energies. We have achieved a substantial
recovery in the XRT resolution by implementing these corrections in an updated
version of the Swift XRT gain file and in corresponding improvements to the
Swift XRT HEAsoft software. We provide illustrations of the impact of the
enhanced energy resolution, and show that we have recovered most of the
spectral resolution lost since launch.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.0680 [pdf] - 392451
AXIOM: Advanced X-ray Imaging Of the Magnetosphere
Branduardi-Raymont, G.;
Sembay, S. F.;
Eastwood, J. P.;
Sibeck, D. G.;
Abbey, A.;
Brown, P.;
Carter, J. A.;
Carr, C. M.;
Forsyth, C.;
Kataria, D.;
Kemble, S.;
Milan, S. E.;
Owen, C. J.;
Peacocke, L.;
Read, A. M.;
Coates, A. J.;
Collier, M. R.;
Cowley, S. W. H.;
Fazakerley, A. N.;
Fraser, G. W.;
Jones, G. H.;
Lallement, R.;
Lester, M.;
Porter, F. S.;
Yeoman, T. K.
Submitted: 2011-07-04, last modified: 2011-08-01
Planetary plasma and magnetic field environments can be studied by in situ
measurements or by remote sensing. While the former provide precise information
about plasma behaviour, instabilities and dynamics on local scales, the latter
offers the global view necessary to understand the overall interaction of the
magnetospheric plasma with the solar wind. Here we propose a novel and more
elegant approach employing remote X-ray imaging techniques, which are now
possible thanks to the relatively recent discovery of solar wind charge
exchange X-ray emissions in the vicinity of the Earth's magnetosphere. We
describe how an appropriately designed and located X-ray telescope, supported
by simultaneous in situ measurements of the solar wind, can be used to image
the dayside magnetosphere, magnetosheath and bow shock, with a temporal and
spatial resolution sufficient to address several key outstanding questions
concerning how the solar wind interacts with the Earth's magnetosphere on a
global level. Our studies have led us to propose 'AXIOM: Advanced X-ray Imaging
Of the Magnetosphere', a concept mission using a Vega launcher with a LISA
Pathfinder-type Propulsion Module to place the spacecraft in a Lissajous orbit
around the Earth - Moon L1 point. The model payload consists of an X-ray Wide
Field Imager and an in situ plasma and magnetic field measurement package. This
package comprises sensors designed to measure the bulk properties of the solar
wind and to characterise its minor ion populations which cause charge exchange
emission, and a magnetometer designed to measure the strength and direction of
the solar wind magnetic field. We show simulations that demonstrate how the
proposed X-ray telescope design is capable of imaging the predicted emission
from the dayside magnetosphere with the sensitivity and cadence required to
achieve the science goals of the mission.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.1444 [pdf] - 133431
A new measurement of the cosmic X-ray background
Moretti, A.;
Pagani, C.;
Cusumano, G.;
Campana, S.;
Perri, M.;
Abbey, A.;
Ajello, M.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Burrows, D.;
Chincarini, G.;
Godet, O.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hill, J. E.;
Kennea, J.;
Nousek, J.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2008-11-10, last modified: 2008-12-09
We present a new measurement of the cosmic X-ray background (CXRB) in the
1.5-7 keV energy band, performed by exploiting the Swift X-ray telescope (XRT)
data archive. We also present a CXRB spectral model in a wider energy band
(1.5-200 keV), obtained by combining these data with the recently published
Swift-BAT measurement. From the XRT archive we collect a complete sample of 126
high Galactic latitude gamma-ray burst (GRB) follow-up observations. This
provides a total exposure of 7.5 Ms and a sky-coverage of 7 square degrees
which represents a serendipitous survey, well suited for a direct measurement
of the CXRB in the 1.5-10 keV interval. Our work is based on a complete
characterization of the instrumental background and an accurate measurement of
the stray-light contamination and vignetting calibration. We find that the CXRB
spectrum in the 1.5-7 keV energy band can be equally well fitted by a single
power-law with photon index Gamma=1.47+/-0.07 or a single power-law with photon
index Gamma=1.41+/-0.06 and an exponential roll-off at 41 keV. The measured
flux in the 2-10 keV energy band is 2.18+/-0.13 E-11 erg/(cm2 s deg2) in the
2-10 keV band. Combining Swift-XRT with Swift-BAT (15-200 keV) we find that, in
the 1.5-200 keV band, the CXRB spectrum can be well described by two
smoothly-joined power laws with the energy break at 29.0+/-0.5 keV
corresponding to a nu F_nu peak located at 22.4+/-0.4 keV. Taking advantage of
both the Swift high energy instruments (XRT and BAT), we produce an analytical
description of the CXRB spectrum over a wide (1.5-200 keV) energy band. This
model is marginally consistent with the HEAO1 measurement (~10% higher at
energies higher than 20 keV, while it is significantly (30%) higher at low
energies (2-10 keV).
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0811.4246 [pdf] - 18909
Modelling the spectral response of the Swift-XRT CCD camera: Experience
learnt from in-flight calibration
Godet, O.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Cusumano, G.;
Pagani, C.;
Capalbi, M.;
Perri, M.;
Page, K. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Campana, S.;
Hill, J. E.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Moretti, A.
Submitted: 2008-11-26
(Abbreviated) We show that the XRT spectral response calibration was
complicated by various energy offsets in photon counting (PC) and windowed
timing (WT) modes related to the way the CCD is operated in orbit (variation in
temperature during observations, contamination by optical light from the sunlit
Earth and increase in charge transfer inefficiency). We describe how these
effects can be corrected for in the ground processing software. We show that
the low-energy response, the redistribution in spectra of absorbed sources, and
the modelling of the line profile have been significantly improved since launch
by introducing empirical corrections in our code when it was not possible to
use a physical description. We note that the increase in CTI became noticeable
in June 2006 (i.e. 14 months after launch), but the evidence of a more serious
degradation in spectroscopic performance (line broadening and change in the
low-energy response) due to large charge traps (i.e. faults in the Si crystal)
became more significant after March 2007. We describe efforts to handle such
changes in the spectral response. Finally, we show that the commanded increase
in the substrate voltage from 0 to 6V on 2007 August 30 reduced the dark
current, enabling the collection of useful science data at higher CCD
temperature (up to -50C). We also briefly describe the plan to recalibrate the
XRT response files at this new voltage.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:0803.1983 [pdf] - 10928
Meteoroid and space debris impacts in grazing-incidence telescopes
Submitted: 2008-03-13
Micrometeoroid or space debris impacts have been observed in the focal planes
of the XMM-Newton and Swift-XRT X-ray observatories. These impacts have
resulted in damage to, and in one case the failure of, focal-plane
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) detectors.
We present a simple model for the propagation of micrometeoroids and space
debris particles into telescopes with grazing incidence X-ray optics. The risks
of future focal-plane impact events in three present (Swift-XRT, XMM-Newton,
and Chandra) and two future (SIMBOL-X and XEUS) X-ray observatories are then
estimated.
The probabilities of at least one impact occurring in the Swift-XRT,
XMM-Newton, and Chandra focal planes, in a one year period from the time of
writing in November 2007 are calculated to be ~5% and ~50% and ~3%. First-order
predictions of the impact rates expected for the future SIMBOL-X and XEUS X-ray
observatories yield probabilities for at least one focal-plane impact, during
nominal 5-year missions, of more than 94% and 99%, respectively.
Future X-ray observatories, with large collecting areas and long focal
lengths, may experience much higher impact rates on their focal-plane detectors
than those currently in operation. This should be considered in the design and
planning of future missions.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0803.1844 [pdf] - 10907
The Swift X-Ray Telescope: Status and Performance
Burrows, David N.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Beardmore, A.;
Campana, S.;
Capalbi, M.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cusumano, G.;
Evans, P. A.;
Hill, J. E.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M.;
Godet, O.;
Moretti, A.;
Morris, D. C.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Pagani, C.;
Page, K. L.;
Perri, M.;
Racusin, J.;
Romano, P.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tamburelli, F.;
Tyler, L. G.;
Willingale, R.
Submitted: 2008-03-12
We present science highlights and performance from the Swift X-ray Telescope
(XRT), which was launched on November 20, 2004. The XRT covers the 0.2-10 keV
band, and spends most of its time observing gamma-ray burst (GRB)afterglows,
though it has also performed observations of many other objects. By mid-August
2007, the XRT had observed over 220 GRB afterglows, detecting about 96% of
them. The XRT positions enable followup ground-based optical observations, with
roughly 60% of the afterglows detected at optical or near IR wavelengths.
Redshifts are measured for 33% of X-ray afterglows. Science highlights include
the discovery of flaring behavior at quite late times, with implications for
GRB central engines; localization of short GRBs, leading to observational
support for compact merger progenitors for this class of bursts; a mysterious
plateau phase to GRB afterglows; as well as many other interesting observations
such as X-ray emission from comets, novae, galactic transients, and other
objects.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.2988 [pdf] - 4191
The in-flight spectroscopic performance of the Swift XRT CCD camera
during 2006-2007
Godet, O.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Page, K. L.;
Tyler, L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Evans, P.;
Starling, R.;
Wells, A. A.;
Angelini, L.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Citterio, O.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Hill, J. E.;
Kennea, J.;
LaParola, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Perri, M.;
Capalbi, M.;
Romano, P.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tamburelli, F.
Submitted: 2007-08-22
The Swift X-ray Telescope focal plane camera is a front-illuminated MOS CCD,
providing a spectral response kernel of 135 eV FWHM at 5.9 keV as measured
before launch. We describe the CCD calibration program based on celestial and
on-board calibration sources, relevant in-flight experiences, and developments
in the CCD response model. We illustrate how the revised response model
describes the calibration sources well. Comparison of observed spectra with
models folded through the instrument response produces negative residuals
around and below the Oxygen edge. We discuss several possible causes for such
residuals. Traps created by proton damage on the CCD increase the charge
transfer inefficiency (CTI) over time. We describe the evolution of the CTI
since the launch and its effect on the CCD spectral resolution and the gain.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511604 [pdf] - 77962
A refined position catalog of the Swift XRT afterglows
Moretti, A.;
Perri, M.;
Capalbi, M.;
Angelini, L.;
Hill, J. E.;
Campana, S.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Romano, P.;
Mineo, T.;
Kennea, J.;
Morris, D.;
Nousek, J.;
Pagani, C.;
Racusin, J.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Godet, O.;
Goad, M. R.;
Page, K. L.;
Wells, A. A.;
Chincarini, G.
Submitted: 2005-11-21, last modified: 2006-02-07
We present a catalogue of refined positions of 68 gamma ray burst (GRB)
afterglows observed by the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT) from the launch up to
2005 Oct 16. This is a result of the refinement of the XRT boresight
calibration. We tested this correction by means of a systematic study of a
large sample of X-ray sources observed by XRT with well established optical
counterparts. We found that we can reduce the systematic error radius of the
measurements by a factor of two, from 6.5" to 3.2" (90% of confidence). We
corrected all the positions of the afterglows observed by XRT in the first 11
months of the Swift mission. This is particularly important for the 37 X-ray
afterglows without optical counterpart. Optical follow-up of dark GRBs, in
fact, will be more efficient with the use of the more accurate XRT positions.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510489 [pdf] - 133727
The in-flight spectroscopic performance of the Swift XRT CCD camera
Osborne, J. P.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Godet, O.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Goad, M. R.;
Page, K. L.;
Wells, A. A.;
Angelini, L;
Burrows, D. N.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Citterio, O.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Hill, J. E.;
Kennea, J.;
La Parola, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Perri, M.;
Romano, P.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tamburelli, F.
Submitted: 2005-10-17
The Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT) focal plane camera is a front-illuminated MOS
CCD, providing a spectral response kernel of 144 eV FWHM at 6.5 keV. We
describe the CCD calibration program based on celestial and on-board
calibration sources, relevant in-flight experiences, and developments in the
CCD response model. We illustrate how the revised response model describes the
calibration sources well. Loss of temperature control motivated a laboratory
program to re-optimize the CCD substrate voltage, we describe the small changes
in the CCD response that would result from use of a substrate voltage of 6V.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510008 [pdf] - 1468931
GRB 050117: Simultaneous Gamma-ray and X-ray Observations with the Swift
Satellite
Hill, J. E.;
Morris, D. C.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Sato, G.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Angelini, L.;
Pagani, C.;
Moretti, A.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Biryukov, V. V.;
Campana, S.;
Capalbi, M.;
Cusumano, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Ibrahimov, M. A.;
Kennea, J.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Ioka, K.;
Markwardt, C.;
Meszaros, P.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Pozanenko, A. S.;
Perri, M.;
Rumyantsev, V. V.;
Shady, P.;
Sharapov, D. A.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Zhang, B.;
Chincarini, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Wells, A.;
Nousek, J. A.
Submitted: 2005-09-30
The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer performed its first autonomous, X-ray
follow-up to a newly detected GRB on 2005 January 17, within 193 seconds of the
burst trigger by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope. While the burst was still in
progress, the X-ray Telescope obtained a position and an image for an
un-catalogued X-ray source; simultaneous with the gamma-ray observation. The
XRT observed flux during the prompt emission was 1.1 x 10^{-8} ergs cm^{-2}
s^{-1} in the 0.5-10 keV energy band. The emission in the X-ray band decreased
by three orders of magnitude within 700 seconds, following the prompt emission.
This is found to be consistent with the gamma-ray decay when extrapolated into
the XRT energy band. During the following 6.3 hours, the XRT observed the
afterglow in an automated sequence for an additional 947 seconds, until the
burst became fully obscured by the Earth limb. A faint, extremely slowly
decaying afterglow, alpha=-0.21$, was detected. Finally, a break in the
lightcurve occurred and the flux decayed with alpha<-1.2$. The X-ray position
triggered many follow-up observations: no optical afterglow could be confirmed,
although a candidate was identified 3 arcsecs from the XRT position.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508071 [pdf] - 74960
The Swift X-ray Telescope
Burrows, David N.;
Hill, J. E.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Wells, A.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Beardmore, A.;
Mukerjee, K;
Short, A. D. T.;
Chincarini, G.;
Campana, S.;
Citterio, O.;
Moretti, A.;
Pagani, C.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Giommi, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
Tamburelli, F.;
Angelini, L.;
Cusumano, G.;
Braeuninger, H. W.;
Burkert, W.;
Hartner, G. D.
Submitted: 2005-08-02
The Swift Gamma-Ray Explorer is designed to make prompt multiwavelength
observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and GRB afterglows. The X-ray Telescope
(XRT) enables Swift to determine GRB positions with a few arcseconds accuracy
within 100 seconds of the burst onset.
The XRT utilizes a mirror set built for JET-X and an XMM/EPIC MOS CCD
detector to provide a sensitive broad-band (0.2-10 keV) X-ray imager with
effective area of > 120 cm^2 at 1.5 keV, field of view of 23.6 x 23.6
arcminutes, and angular resolution of 18 arcseconds (HPD). The detection
sensitivity is 2x10^-14 erg cm^-2 s^-1 in 10^4 seconds. The instrument is
designed to provide automated source detection and position reporting within 5
seconds of target acquisition. It can also measure the redshifts of GRBs with
Fe line emission or other spectral features. The XRT operates in an
auto-exposure mode, adjusting the CCD readout mode automatically to optimize
the science return for each frame as the source intensity fades. The XRT will
measure spectra and lightcurves of the GRB afterglow beginning about a minute
after the burst and will follow each burst for days or weeks.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0504331 [pdf] - 133714
Swift observations of GRB050128: the early X-ray afterglow
Campana, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Chincarini, G.;
Covino, S.;
Cusumano, G.;
Malesani, D.;
Mangano, V.;
Moretti, A.;
Pagani, C.;
Romano, P.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Capalbi, M.;
Perri, M.;
Giommi, P.;
Angelini, L.;
Boyd, P.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Hill, J. E.;
Gronwall, C.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Kumar, P.;
Meszaros, P.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Zhang, B.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Breeveld, A.;
Goad, M. R.;
Godet, O.;
Mason, K. O.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Page, K. L.;
Poole, T.;
Gehrels, N.
Submitted: 2005-04-14
Swift discovered GRB050128 with the Burst Alert Telescope and promptly
pointed its narrow field instruments to monitor the afterglow. X-ray
observations started 108 s after the trigger time. The early decay of the
afterglow is relatively flat with a temporal decay modeled with a power law
with index ~ -0.3. A steepening occurs at later times (~ 1500 s) with a power
law index of ~ -1.3. During this transition, the observed X-ray spectrum does
not change. We interpret this behaviour as either an early jet break or
evidence for a transition from the fast cooling regime to the slow cooling
regime in a wind environment.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502326 [pdf] - 71117
Swift XRT and VLT Observations of the Afterglow of GRB 041223
Burrows, David N.;
Hill, Joanne E.;
Chincarini, Guido;
Tagliaferri, Gianpiero;
Campana, Sergio;
Moretti, Alberto;
Romano, Patrizia;
Malesani, Daniele;
Racusin, Judith L.;
Kobayashi, Shiho;
Zhang, Bing;
Meszaros, Peter;
O'Brien, Paul T.;
Willingale, Richard;
Osborne, Julian P.;
Cusumano, Giancarlo;
Giommi, Paolo;
Angelini, Lorella;
Abbey, Antony F.;
Antonelli, L. Angelo;
Beardmore, Andrew P.;
Capalbi, Milvia;
Covino, Stefano;
D'Avanzo, Paolo;
Goad, Michael R.;
Kennea, Jamie A.;
Morris, David C.;
Pagani, Claudio;
Page, Kim L.;
Stella, Luigi;
Nousek, John A.;
Wells, Alan A.;
Gehrels, Neil
Submitted: 2005-02-16
The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer, launched on 2004 November 20, is a
multiwavelength, autonomous, rapid-slewing observatory for gamma-ray burst
(GRB) astronomy. On 2004 December 23, during the activation phase of the
mission, the Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT) was pointed at a burst discovered
earlier that day by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope. A fading, uncataloged
X-ray source was discovered by the XRT and was observed over a period of about
3 hours, beginning 4.6 hours after the burst. The X-ray detection triggered a
VLT observation of the optical/NIR counterpart, located about 1.1 arcseconds
from the XRT position. The X-ray counterpart faded rapidly, with a power law
index of -1.72 +/- 0.20. The average unabsorbed X-ray flux 4.6-7.9 hours after
the burst was 6.5 x 10^{-12} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1} in the 0.5-10 keV band, for a
power-law spectrum of photon index 2.02 +/- 0.13 with Galactic absorption. The
NIR counterpart was observed at three epochs between 16 and 87 hours after the
burst, and faded with a power-law index of -1.14 +/- 0.08 with a
reddening-corrected SED power-law slope of -0.40 +/- 0.03. We find that the
X-ray and NIR data are consistent with a two-component jet in a wind medium,
with an early jet break in the narrow component and an underlying electron
index of 1.8-2.0.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0407347 [pdf] - 66189
In-orbit performance of the EPIC-MOS detectors on XMM-Newton
Submitted: 2004-07-16
XMM-Newton was launched into space on a highly eccentric 48 hour orbit on
December 10th 1999. XMM-Newton is now in its fifth year of operation and has
been an outstanding success, observing the Cosmos with imaging, spectroscopy
and timing capabilities in the X-ray and optical wavebands. The EPIC-MOS CCD
X-ray detectors comprise two out of three of the focal plane instruments on
XMM-Newton. In this paper we discuss key aspects of the current status and
performance history of the charge transfer ineffiency (CTI), energy resolution
and spectral redistribution function (rmf) of EPIC-MOS in its fifth year of
operation.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0202372 [pdf] - 47866
Status of the EPIC/MOS calibration
Ferrando, P.;
Abbey, A. F.;
Altieri, B.;
Arnaud, M.;
Bennie, P.;
Dadina, M.;
Denby, M.;
Ghizzardi, S.;
Griffiths, R. G.;
La Palombara, N.;
de Luca, A.;
Lumb, D.;
Molendi, S.;
Neumann, D.;
Sauvageot, J. L.;
Saxton, R. D.;
Sembay, S.;
Tiengo, A.;
Turner, M. J. L.
Submitted: 2002-02-20
The XMM-Newton observatory has the largest collecting area flown so far for
an X-ray imaging system, resulting in a very high sensitivity over a broad
spectral range. In order to exploit fully these performances, a very accurate
calibration of the XMM-Newton instruments is required, and has led to an
extensive ground and flight calibration program. We report here on the current
status of the EPIC/MOS cameras calibrations, highlighting areas for which a
reasonably good accuracy has been achieved, and noting points where further
work is needed.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0011498 [pdf] - 39504
The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS Cameras
Submitted: 2000-11-27
The EPIC focal plane imaging spectrometers on XMM-Newton use CCDs to record
the images and spectra of celestial X-ray sources focused by the three X-ray
mirrors. There is one camera at the focus of each mirror; two of the cameras
contain seven MOS CCDs, while the third uses twelve PN CCDs, defining a
circular field of view of 30 arcmin diameter in each case. The CCDs were
specially developed for EPIC, and combine high quality imaging with spectral
resolution close to the Fano limit. A filter wheel carrying three kinds of
X-ray transparent light blocking filter, a fully closed, and a fully open
position, is fitted to each EPIC instrument. The CCDs are cooled passively and
are under full closed loop thermal control. A radio-active source is fitted for
internal calibration. Data are processed on-board to save telemetry by removing
cosmic ray tracks, and generating X-ray event files; a variety of different
instrument modes are available to increase the dynamic range of the instrument
and to enable fast timing. The instruments were calibrated using laboratory
X-ray beams, and synchrotron generated monochromatic X-ray beams before launch;
in-orbit calibration makes use of a variety of celestial X-ray targets. The
current calibration is better than 10% over the entire energy range of 0.2 to
10 keV. All three instruments survived launch and are performing nominally in
orbit. In particular full field-of-view coverage is available, all electronic
modes work, and the energy resolution is close to pre-launch values. Radiation
damage is well within pre-launch predictions and does not yet impact on the
energy resolution. The scientific results from EPIC amply fulfil pre-launch
expectations.