We present an update of our previous work, necessitated by availability of a significantly improved dataset. The work is a model-independent analysis of the cosmological supernova (Type Ia) data, where function families are fit to the data in form of luminosity distance as function of redshift, that is, $d_{L}(z)$; and subsequently time-derivatives of the scale function $a(t)$ are $analytically$ derived, but as functions of $z$, without making assumptions about of gravity or the contents of the universe. This gives, e.g. the redshift value at which the universe goes over from deceleration to acceleration, as $z_{t}=0.54 \pm 0.04$ for a flat universe. In the update, we switch to a more modern fit criterion and also take into account the uncertainty in the calibration of the SNIa luminosities. If a theory of gravity $is$ assumed, our results allow determination of the density of the universe as function of $z$, from which conclusions about the contents of the universe can be drawn. We update the previous work's result where this was done for Einstein gravity, finding a lower-limit on the dark energy fraction, $\Omega_{DE}>0.46$; and here we do this also for Starobinsky gravity, where we can find a Starobinsky parameter that can eliminate the need for dark energy.

We explore a gedanken-model for cosmic evolution, where dark matter is strongly self-interacting and stays in a plasma state until late stages. After decoupling it condensates to super-structures with cosmic voids similar to current picture of the universe. With the help of the equation of state of dry foam (equivalently a fluid with voids in it) from fluid mechanics it is possible to show that tension within these cosmic walls due to their binding interaction may cause accelerated expansion in the absence of dark energy.

Not much by themselves, aparently. We try to reconstruct the scale factor $a(t)$ of the universe from the SNe Ia data, i.e. the luminosity distance $d_{L}(z)$, using only the cosmological principle and the assumption that gravitation is governed by a metric theory. In our hence "model-independent," or "cosmographic" study, we fit functions to $d_{L}(z)$ rather than $a(t)$, since $d_{L}(z)$ is what is measured. We find that the acceleration history of the universe cannot be reliably determined in this approach due to the irregularity and parametrization-dependence of the results. However, adding the GRB data to the dataset cures most of the irregularities, at the cost of compromising the model-independent nature of the study slightly. Then we can determine the redshift of transition to cosmic acceleration as $z_{\rm t} \sim 0.50 \pm 0.09$ for a flat universe (larger for positive spatial curvature). If Einstein gravity (GR) is assumed, we find a redshift at which the density of the universe predicted from the $d_{L}(z)$ data is independent of curvature. We use this point to derive an upper limit on matter density, hence a lower limit on the density of dark energy. While these limits do not improve the generally accepted ones, they are derived *only using the $d_{L}(z)$ data*.

Acoustic oscillations in stars can be driven by gravitational waves. However, at present it is not feasible to use the helioseismology data for their detection, since it is impossible to disentangle the uncertain driving contributions originating in the Sun itself. We here point out that any such wave will affect also Jupiter and Saturn in a similar $and$ $coordinated$ $way$; after all, they are mostly spheres of gas like the Sun, only one order of magnitude smaller. Hence, akin to the concept of coincidence detection in particle physics experiments, evaluation of the time-correlation function of the measured acoustic velocities of the same mode of oscillation of any two of these three objects will eliminate the (independent) internal effects; and observation of a peak in that correlation function will be tantamount to detection of a gravitational wave. There is a (slight) possibility that such detection has already occured.